285/75R16 ******** Cepek FC II, Mickey Thompson MTZ/ATZ, Cooper S/T-C

jim65wagon

Well-known member
.
The road 'hum' noise - do you know if it is louder or quieter than the Cooper S/T? Or your new Dean SXT? I think the Dean SXT may be a bit quieter than the Cooper S/T?

My experience between my truck with the ST's, Mark's Dodge with the FCII's and his Jeep with the Dean SXT....The Deans and the FCII's are both quieter than the ST's, I could never decide between the Deans or the FCII's if one was louder than the other mainly because of the difference in vehicles (Jeep vs pickup). But the ST's are definitely the loudest of the three....
 

p1michaud

Expedition Leader
Difficult decision...

I had originally posted this over in my Cruiser thread when you asked about the MTZ tire but the comments are valid here...

Redline,
I've got a bit of feedback for you. I did not measure the thread depth when they were new, but I'll be buying a new one as a matching spare sortly so I'll have something to "baseline" against.

Noise - I've been pleasantly suprised. For their agressiveness they are quiet and you can cruise arround at 80 - 100 Km/h (this is about as fast as I go with the cruiser!) without having to listen to the drone. They have exceeded my expectations on the noise front.

Ride - I'd say soft, but it's a bit hard to tell because I've just gone from a Tacoma to an 80 Series. Some of the differences are due to the change in vehicle. On road, 34 psi is just right (as set by the tire shop, they specialize in 4WD tires/off road and suggested I stick to that value for the heavier cruiser). They thread has a nice full contact but the sidewalls are not excessively bulged.

On sand, gravel and hard packed dirt road. Never had any issues/concerns to date. They do throw the odd rock up into the fenders, but nothing worse than other tires I've had to date (MTR or Cooper ST). I had heard some concerns about handling on wet roads (paved) but they are working fine for me and I've had to drive in a few crazy downpours to date.
Overall, very happy with their performance and I'm gald I decided to give them a try.
Nothing scientific but there you have it!

Both the Cooper and ******** Cepek would be good tires. I've seen a few FCII first hand and was intrigued by them. Back in Canada, a member of our local off road group purchased a set of ******** Cepek Mud Country tires in 33" x 12.5" and was very pleased with their performance (might as well throw one more in the mix for you...:sombrero:). One concern about the Coopers ST-C is that the rubber compound may be too hard. No first hand experience but somthing to look into.
Cheers,
P
 

jatibb

Adventurer
ran a set of mt atz on a rodeo a few years ago, really liked the road manners and cleared well enough for me here in ga. clay, but never really went boggon or crawling either. long lasting and quite on the road.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Thanks Jim. This was my guess too, but I wanted to hear it from you guys.

The S/T does have lots of void and is surprising loud depending on ones tolerance to tire noise. My memory has faded but for the short time and few miles I had a set of Dean SXTs on my Jeep I remembered them being quieter than the Cooper S/Ts I have now. (Still like the S/Ts though.)

This is one of the things that attracts me to the FCIIs, relatively quiet.

My experience between my truck with the ST's, Mark's Dodge with the FCII's and his Jeep with the Dean SXT....The Deans and the FCII's are both quieter than the ST's, I could never decide between the Deans or the FCII's if one was louder than the other mainly because of the difference in vehicles (Jeep vs pickup). But the ST's are definitely the loudest of the three....
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
I'm also intrigued by the FCII. Seems like it might be a nice balance of noise, traction and wear and in a different looking package. It's probably a really neat tire with unappreciated attributes and style, unpopular because it's not a 'big name' brand... or it's a so-so tire that is nothing special. I'm betting they might be pretty cool and Haggis' opinion counts for a lot.

Cooper

Yep, I'm still undecided on the pros & cons of the 'chip/cut resistant' tread compound on the 285 S/T-Cs. I missed a call this afternoon from an engineer at Cooper. I waiting to hear if the tread compound is 'harder or softer' to be chip resistant, but regardless of what the facts are the compound is certainly 'different' and per the sliding scale on Cooper's site the S/T-C tread is NOT as good for winter traction but it better for off-road.

I still like my skinny little S/Ts. They might be a little too narrow and soft, which is noticeable in the turns as there is little yaw resistance, but still a great all-around tire. Might be weak but I haven't popped one yet, but they haven't seen tons of off-highway use like my Maxxis Bighorns either.

Mickey Thompson/******** Cepek

Today I spoke with a guy at Mickey Thompson who was pretty helpful (they own ******** Cepek and I think Cooper owns them both - Cooper at least builds all the tires).

I asked about the Fun Country's resistance to cutting and he said they are pretty good at resisting cutting/chipping as they are a "harder" all-terrain tread compound. When asked about the exact construction of the tread plies he originally told me they are a 6-ply tread. After walking out to read the construction on the tire sidewall and calling me back we learned they have a 5-ply tread.

Sidewall is 2 polyester plies
Tread: 2 Steel, 2 Poly, 1 Nylon

This sounds good as the additional nylon ply should help strengthen the tire, this is the same plies as the Maxxis Bighorns.

Then I asked him about noise and void ratios. Obviously the MTZ has more void and more noise. When it comes to the FCII and the ATZ he couldn't make a definitive call about noise, but agreed that the FCII was a more aggressive all-terrain than the ATZ because of the outer tread lugs with a higher void ratio - a "hybrid design" just like their advertising says (one of the things I like about the tire).

I also called a custom Jeep builder/ shop owner I'm casually aquatinted with from Oregon. I remember he or one of his guys mentioning the FCII a couple years ago and I wanted some additional input. He said it's a good tire, and quiet. He doesn't have enough miles on them to comment on wear. His only negative was that they don't “look” aggressive enough when he puts them on a built-up Jeep to match the overall look of the build.

285/75R16 Fit?

The real rub ☺ here is will a 285 even fit on my Mall Crawler without additional mods? My fear is the answer is NO from all the stuff I have read on Toyota120.com and the FJC Forum. I don't mind a little rubbing, but too much that damages the car body or tires, or inhibits off-highway performance is not okay.

I might have an opportunity to borrow a buddy BFG ATs in this size, we'll see.

The jury is till out :)


I had originally posted this over in my Cruiser thread when you asked about the MTZ tire but the comments are valid here...


Both the Cooper and ******** Cepek would be good tires. I've seen a few FCII first hand and was intrigued by them. Back in Canada, a member of our local off road group purchased a set of ******** Cepek Mud Country tires in 33" x 12.5" and was very pleased with their performance (might as well throw one more in the mix for you...:sombrero:). One concern about the Coopers ST-C is that the rubber compound may be too hard. No first hand experience but somthing to look into.
Cheers,
P
 
Last edited:

Haggis

Appalachian Ridgerunner
What Jim reported is correct, the FC IIs are quieter than the Deans and the Sts. And yes they are all made by Cooper. On the Jeep the Deans seem to take a few minutes to heat up, and seem to ride rough until they do. Once up to temps they're great. They aren't as good on icy conditions as the FC IIs, but work great on the snow. After seeing The Sts aired down on Jimbo's truck and the FC IIs aired down on mine I'd say that the FC IIs have a much better contact patch. The sidewall "lettering" on the FC IIs really squat nice and add extra lugs to the patch.

I'd buy another set of the Cepeks in a minute for the Tundra if I could get a good deal. Cheapest I could find is $208, but than I'd have to pay shipping (approx. $80) and then mounting (another $40). Thats adds up to $952. My tire guy Fran, quoted me Dean SXTs in 285/75/16 for $165.00 mounted balanced and out the door. Thats adds up to $700 even after paying PA sales tax, plus my money will stay local. With the savings I can pay for the front lift on the Tundra. So Deans it is.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Wow that is inexpensive for the Deans. That's about what I can get Cooper S/T for here in 285/75 (not the S/T-C) whereas the SXTs are more expensive than your price on the FCII.

Lucky for me if I decide to buy them is that the FCII is newly available from the TireRack.com for $204.00 each, no shipping, tax local 63.16, then it will cost me another $60.00 to have them mounted and balance. Price is a factor, but I won't buy only on price. If I want them and I can afford them I'll buy ‘em.

With your and Jim's input the ******** Cepek FCII look better all the time.


What Jim reported is correct, the FC IIs are quieter than the Deans and the Sts. And yes they are all made by Cooper. On the Jeep the Deans seem to take a few minutes to heat up, and seem to ride rough until they do. Once up to temps they're great. They aren't as good on icy conditions as the FC IIs, but work great on the snow. After seeing The Sts aired down on Jimbo's truck and the FC IIs aired down on mine I'd say that the FC IIs have a much better contact patch. The sidewall "lettering" on the FC IIs really squat nice and add extra lugs to the patch.

I'd buy another set of the Cepeks in a minute for the Tundra if I could get a good deal. Cheapest I could find is $208, but than I'd have to pay shipping (approx. $80) and then mounting (another $40). Thats adds up to $952. My tire guy Fran, quoted me Dean SXTs in 285/75/16 for $165.00 mounted balanced and out the door. Thats adds up to $700 even after paying PA sales tax, plus my money will stay local. With the savings I can pay for the front lift on the Tundra. So Deans it is.
 

jim65wagon

Well-known member
See, what you need to do (a magazine article) is get yourself a durometer and a decibel meter, assemble all these tires together and do a full on road/off road test in the best of tire testing traditions; report your findings and keep the set you like the best!

Seriously, down here, everything of size is running near 200 a tire, plus mounting and balancing. I've been quoted in excess of 230 and a low of 190. One local place will do them for 197 a piece mounted,balanced, taxed out the door and on the truck.


You will like the DCs, if they fit...
 

Haggis

Appalachian Ridgerunner
Wow that is inexpensive for the Deans. That's about what I can get Cooper S/T for here in 285/75 (not the S/T-C) whereas the SXTs are more expensive than your price on the FCII.

It most be a regional thing. Here the STs are more expensive than the Deans, the quote I got for the Coopers was $206 for the 285s and like I said the Deans are $165. I got a quote for Jim on 255s last week; the Sts were $186 and the SXTs were $176. Also Fran (my tire guy) told me his supplier said that wholesale prices were expected to go up around 15% mid April across the board on all brands.

Good Gravy! I just realized what tire geeks we are. :sombrero:
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
I have written a few tire articles for niche diesel pickup enthusiast publications.

Several months ago I wanted to do some noise testing for the different tires I had at my disposal. I learned there was already a noise testing standard which would be difficult to conform to. I decided it was going to be too much work and hassle, and really didn't matter for any of the tire articles I was writing because of the many variables.

Haggis

You are right, we are tire geeks :) Thing is, it's still cheaper to swap tires than it is to change trucks or wives. It's one of the easier ways to dress up (or down) and accessorize a 4x4 :)

On Topic-

Because we have a short road trip planned for this Sunday I pulled the Maxxis Bighorns after less than 150 miles (went snow wheelin' a couple weeks ago) and remounted the Cooper S/Ts. All complaints or concerns aside, I obviously like the S/T as my tire milage log has the most entires for the S/Ts. The Bighorns only have more miles on them because I've had them longer and they have been on a few long camping trips.

This fact argues in favor of the S/T-C in 285/75 as I know I like the tire. One concern I have is that 'any' 285 is going to be louder because there is more rubber on the road & rolling resistance.


See, what you need to do (a magazine article) is get yourself a durometer and a decibel meter, assemble all these tires together and do a full on road/off road test in the best of tire testing traditions; report your findings and keep the set you like the best!

Seriously, down here, everything of size is running near 200 a tire, plus mounting and balancing. I've been quoted in excess of 230 and a low of 190. One local place will do them for 197 a piece mounted,balanced, taxed out the door and on the truck.


You will like the DCs, if they fit...
 
Last edited:

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
FCII in Snow x2

To back-up what Haggis said about the Fun Country IIs snow/ice traction...

I was at my local 4WD shop today and I asked the owner (who has been in the 4x4 business for 30-years) what he thought of the FCII. Without my prompting he offered that their snow traction was superior. He said just look at the tread... the lateral tread blocks in the middle instead of the circumferential tread ribs of most tires. He also offered that he used to run them on his Jeep back when the design was made by Norseman (sp?).

Also, on the side of his shop was a very worn set of FCII that had recently been removed from a truck. They were very large, maybe 315s, but they looked to have worn very evenly. The tires had maybe 5/32 remaining and the shop guys commented that the owner got a lot of miles out of them. I don't know what kind of truck they were on.

I find it interesting that this niche tread design has lasted so many years. They may not sell many FCII, but they are still around. If it wasn't for concerns about the width of 285 over the 255s I always run and prefer, I would order a set of FCII today. 265/75 would be a much better fit for the car but I just can't bring myself to go back down to that size. Maybe I will get over it...
 
Last edited:

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Cooper has removed the S/T-C in 285/75R16 from their website! I guess this option will not be available in the future :(
 

Haggis

Appalachian Ridgerunner
He also offered that he used to run them on his Jeep back when the design was made by Norseman (sp?).

One of the reasons I got the first set of FC IIs is that they reminded me of the old Anderson Tru-Tracs that my Grandpa use to run on his Commando and FJ-40. Everybody around here who worked in the woods, in the oil business or on the strip mines back in the early 70s ran the Tru-Tracs. Granted there was not the choice in offroad tires back in those days, but they where the tire of choice.
 

p1michaud

Expedition Leader
News regarding ******** Cepek FCII down under...

Redline,
I attended the Brisbane National 4x4 show this past weekend and had a great discussion with the Queensland Mickey Thompson tire rep concerning the MTZ and ******** Cepek FCII. He was very happy with the performance and results of the MTZ in the general market so far. He also gave me a bit of news regarding Mickey Thompson and ******** Cepek. Apparently the companies have parted ways in North America. As a result the ******** Cepek FCII will no longer be available in Australia in two years...:Wow1: The replacement for that market niche will be the MT ATZ.

I did see quite a bit of FCII mounted on various rigs at the show. I'll try and post some pictures for you by end of week. I did see a staggering number of rigs with the MTZ tires though.

Cheers,
P
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,824
Messages
2,921,320
Members
232,931
Latest member
Northandfree

Members online

Top