33"s with stock gearing?

C

cr500taco

Adventurer
Box Rocket said:
and for the record, those pics are with 33x12.50s on 15x8 wheels (I'm unsure of the offset since the wheels were on the truck when I bought it). 2.5" OME suspension, No body lift, no change in bumpstops and only slight trimming of the fender liner and flattening the pinch weld (which needs to be done with anything other than a 31" or smaller tire). No rubbing of the firewall or the frame. But who am I kidding, those are extreme mods apparently to force a tire to fit where it has no business being.
Click to expand...

Box Rocket, you brought up a good point that I have been wondering. What is the benefit of running wider tires? I know wider is better for the sand. I was thinking of getting 33X10.5x15 tires. For one, I like my stock wheels and didn't see the need to get new wheels if I didn't need to; two, was thinking that the narrower tires will be easier to fit in the fender wells without as much modification or fiberglass fenders and third the narrow tires will be better for the trails. But, I have noticed a few builds, you and blackdawg come to mind at the moment, that run wider tires.
 
01tundra

01tundra

Explorer
Box Rocket said:
And I'd have no problem having you along for the ride. You let me know when and I'm in. Seriously.
Click to expand...

I was just giving you crap, I knew where you were coming from. There's been a few statements made in this thread that's made me scratch my head as well......

Someday we'll make it back out your direction.....been trying for a few years now.
 
Last edited:
Box Rocket

Box Rocket

Well-known member
cr500taco said:
Box Rocket, you brought up a good point that I have been wondering. What is the benefit of running wider tires? I know wider is better for the sand. I was thinking of getting 33X10.5x15 tires. For one, I like my stock wheels and didn't see the need to get new wheels if I didn't need to; two, was thinking that the narrower tires will be easier to fit in the fender wells without as much modification or fiberglass fenders and third the narrow tires will be better for the trails. But, I have noticed a few builds, you and blackdawg come to mind at the moment, that run wider tires.
Click to expand...

the 33x1050's will definitely fit easier. They really are a great size tire on a Tacoma with 2-2.5" lift. When it was time to replace my 33x1050s, I wanted to try the MTR which isn't available in the narrower size. Not too many are. Almost without exception I've preferred the wider tire. Only downside I have felt is more rolling resistence which creates a hit to mpg. The wider tires gave a "heavier" feel to the steering which I like. On a mildly wheeled "overland" rig the narrower tires would be great. For what I end up doing which is a mix of overland type wheeling and some rock crawling the wider tires have been slightly better and have a more stable feel for sure.
 
Clutch

Clutch

<---Pass
Box Rocket said:
See my earlier comments about capabilities of stock vehicles. I've been impressed more than once by a stock vehicle with a good driver. My only point is that for me, it's much more enjoyable and less effort to take my modified truck through some places than it would be if it were stock.
Click to expand...

I dunno, I am running the same amount of lift as you (don't even consider it a major mod, pretty basic actually)...I don't really see that much difference. Other than I can drive it just a tad faster without it wallowing, but it still has limits, which I can push it beyond those limits pretty quick.

Now if you go the rock crawler and sas it, with huge amounts of articulation...or the prerunner route...with LT front suspension, and lop of the rear of the frame and link it...yeah now there is huge amount of offroad performance gained.

2-3" lift though...meh, just splitting hairs...performance gain is minimal at best. I can take a stock vehicle through the same places...and have.
 
Box Rocket

Box Rocket

Well-known member
I can't disagree completely. But the OME setup is so much better than stock suspension. Handles very well in the dirt, in the rocks and load capacity is vastly improved. I know it's not a huge jump, but definitely more than splitting hairs. The other extremes of full long-travel or Solid axle swap are one extreme to another with the suspension built primarily for one purpose in mind, either going fast or flexing like mad in the rocks. Most people don't want to completely commit to one way or another.
 
Clutch

Clutch

<---Pass
Box Rocket said:
I can't disagree completely. But the OME setup is so much better than stock suspension. Handles very well in the dirt, in the rocks and load capacity is vastly improved. I know it's not a huge jump, but definitely more than splitting hairs.
Click to expand...

It is a little better, but it isn't like you can go soooo many more places because of it. I am hauling the same load and going to the same places now, as when it was stock. Nothing to get too excited about, I am running Camburg CO's...they're good, perhaps a little better than OME's...but not pants wetting good.
 
SIZZLE

SIZZLE

Pro-party
cr500taco said:
I agree. I was thinking that, myself yesterday. I looked into the BFG All Terrains and they are only available in a 11.5' wide requiring 8"-10" wide wheel. My wheels are stock and if I remember correctly, they are 7" wide, so I would need to get new wheels that are wider for the 32s. I think, that I am going to stick with the 31s for now, until after I get the suspension they way I want it with new springs all around and re-gear. I do like the peppiness of it the way it is, so I don't want to loose it by getting the 33s without re-gearing.
Click to expand...

I ran 285s on 7" rims down to 15 PSI, no problem. You don't necessarily need wider rims unless you want to run super low tire pressure, in which case you need beadlocks anyway.

Watch out for load range too. Last time i looked for the BFG ATs, they were only making LT or E, but maybe that was just due to the size i was looking at. You don't want to go above a D in your truck.

OK, everyone can get back to highjacking now.
 
Box Rocket

Box Rocket

Well-known member
Clutch said:
It is a little better, but it isn't like you can go soooo many more places because of it. I am hauling the same load and going to the same places now, as when it was stock. Nothing to get too excited about, I am running Camburg CO's...they're good, perhaps a little better than OME's...but not pants wetting good.
Click to expand...

Getting more places has only a little to do with suspension. Tires, lockers and DRIVER are much more a factor in getting somewhere than suspension.
 
C

cr500taco

Adventurer
Box Rocket said:
the 33x1050's will definitely fit easier. They really are a great size tire on a Tacoma with 2-2.5" lift. When it was time to replace my 33x1050s, I wanted to try the MTR which isn't available in the narrower size. Not too many are. Almost without exception I've preferred the wider tire. Only downside I have felt is more rolling resistence which creates a hit to mpg. The wider tires gave a "heavier" feel to the steering which I like. On a mildly wheeled "overland" rig the narrower tires would be great. For what I end up doing which is a mix of overland type wheeling and some rock crawling the wider tires have been slightly better and have a more stable feel for sure.
Click to expand...

I'll stick with the 33X10.5, then since I don't plan on rock crawling with my truck just overlanding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
188,637
Messages
2,908,158
Members
230,800
Latest member
Mcoleman

Members online

Total: 829 (members: 6, guests: 823)
Top