Add that having more than 8gears forward and lower ratio options in other options is a big plus especially towing trailers. This is where the Rangers running gear is honestly pretty nice. Sadly the tiny fuel tank kinda stinks. But 10spd with the 3.73 rear end is big boy truck stuff 👍
Yes, I'm starting to come around a bit on the Ranger. The requirement for premium gas is an annoying additional expense, and the tiny fuel tank is infuriating but otherwise the Ranger seems to be a good platform.
It's frustrating to me that half ton trucks have become so enormous. Why? They don't need to be, and I'm not sure what's driving the "arms race" of full size trucks. Take a look at full size trucks from 30 or 40 years ago and they weren't as big as ours are now.
This is particularly true with regards to WIDTH. I don't understand why they made the F-150 so wide, it makes it more difficult to park than it should be. Ditto for the 145" wheelbase. They could easily have chopped 6 inches off the cab size and still have a cavernous cab space.
What's funny is that when I drove a Suburban, people would say "Suburban? Wow that's a gigantic vehicle!" and yet, the Suburban was noticeably smaller than my F-150. It was shorter (with a 133" wheelbase), narrower and much easier to park. And yet, I never felt like it was "too small" for me.
And with all that, I could STILL carry a 4x8 sheet of plywood in the back of the 'Burb with the hatch closed!
I wish SOMEBODY would make a truck with the "footprint" of the 1st Generation Tundra and Sequoia. Those trucks were, IMO, the "goldilocks" size: Not too big, not too small, just right.