For comparison a Yaesu FT-8800 is $360 and a KenwoodTM-V71A is $380, which are the dual band, dual RX mobiles.List Price: $349.95
Your Price: $279.95
The Wouxun KG-UV920P is a dual band FM mobile transceiver covering 2 meters and 440 MHz. Three power levels are selectable: 5/25/50W on 2 meters, and 5/20/30W on 440. 999 memories are available. It can be mounted at a variety of angles and features a detachable head.
Wouxun China says his just released "P" version offers the following enhancements over the original "R" version:
Full Duplex Cross-Band (Offset Frequency and Frequency Shift Direction programmable)
Remote Control (Programmable for work mode, like Transceiver mode, Directional Repeating mode and Duplex Repeating mode). Remote Control (Programmable for reset function)
Duplex Work (TX in the master band while RX in the sub band simultaneously)
Automatic Fan (The fan is working once the radio powers on)
Frequency/Channel Scan (Once the matching CTCSS or DCS is scanned, the speaker is ON. Otherwise, it keeps scanning)
Ascended 1750Hz Burst amplitude
The radio has an 18 month limited warranty from the factory in China. The first 90 days (only) are covered by Universal Radio.
I don't get the FTM-400. Yaesu delayed it for a year but still decided to go with a digital voice modulation that isn't compatible with anything already existing. It does not talk to P25, DMR or D-STAR. F-n brilliant, it's a $700 dual band FM with APRS that Kenwood does for $200 less and the FTM-350 did fine.The Yaesus are with rebate; end of the line? The FTM-400 looks more like the wave of the future in dual FM mobile.
I don't get the FTM-400....
There is a big lack of details. I need to add a radio to our other vehicle and was planning on doing another FTM-350, which I have in my truck right now. Some people rag on it and maybe the Kenwood is better but I really like my FTM-350. But they were all gone when I had my money to throw down. Doh! Sometimes Yaesu is so infuriating. The only advantage I can see with the FTM-400 is it has digital modes available and one can hope Yaesu can develop firmware (or maybe someone figures out how to crack it) that can do whatever DV that ends up being standard. D-STAR is fine but is technically inferior to C4FM modes like Yaesu is pushing or P25. I don't disagree with Yaesu there, just wish the big guys would get their act together on this. Plus, it's not like D-STAR is an open source, ICOM controls that pretty tightly.Make that two of us. I wasn't even aware of the digital voice features until now... I thought the purpose of the FT400D was to better integrate APRS / GPS and the display of APRS symbols without the need of a third party product. There isn't a whole lot of detailed feedback on the product yet so it's not easy to analyze.