ARB Locker Wiring & Plumbing

madizell

Explorer
cruiseroutfit said:
Are your comments aimed towards the new ARB compressors? Over double the output of the RDCKA model. While the RDCKA was slow, its done the job for me countless times, at one time filling 12 tires after our CO2 bottles froze :eek: Though I will agree, the RDCKA was OK at best for airing up tires... that makes the new compressor double OK :D

Aimed primarily at the older pump, but I think it makes no difference which we are discussing. The new pump is rated to draw three times the amperage, supplies no more than 2 or so cfm, and is still no better than a 50% duty cycle device. This won't air a full size tire fast enough to count, and if you air one full sized tire from trail pressure to highway pressure you will have exceeded the duty cycle. I get the same performance out of an old Sears portable pump that plugs into the cigarette lighter, and they cost far less.

Air locker pumps don't need to be outstanding, they simply need to work, and the ARB pump does that. For airing tires, you need serious equipment, and the ARB pumps don't qualify for that. I have certainly aired many a 36x13x15 tire with the tiny ARB pump, but it is the having done this that lets me know that the pump is not up to it. Even the ARB western field rep admitted that it was not intended for airing tires. So, getting by is one thing, and buying a pump for the purpose of supplying trail air for tires is another. If one can't afford or fit two systems for the two separate purposes and still wants to air tires, go with the CO2 bottle for the tires and let the ARB pump do what it was designed to do -- lock ARB lockers. If you need to perform both functions, get the pump for the tires and throttle it back for the lockers.
 

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
madizell said:
Aimed primarily at the older pump, but I think it makes no difference which we are discussing. The new pump is rated to draw three times the amperage

Not sure where your getting your numbers, but they are seriously flawed :D
http://www.arbusa.com/alac/alsp/6-07.pdf

18 amps for the RDCKA @ 1cfm vs 23 amps for the CKMA12 ~ 2.2cfm (both rates @ ~30psi). And double the duty cycle too (25% vs 50%). I've aired up a 35" from ~18psi to 35psi in under 5 mins, sure you have to wait, but I would go as far as to call it a marginal pump.

And to that, do amps really matter for a compressor? Its not like a fridge or light that your leaving on all night long, there should be little issue airing up 4 35" tires without the need to even consider starting the vehicle.

Just to be clear its not my chosen method for airing up (I run CO2) but its a great backup... and for many it has become their primary source of air. Can't say I've heard a complaint assuming they knew the facts ahead of time.

madizell said:
Even the ARB western field rep admitted that it was not intended for airing tires...

I'd have to assume your referring solely to the RDCKA here, the CKMA12 was entirely designed to do both, hence the increased pressure, volume and duty... otherwise they would have just stuck with the CKSA12 as the only offering. Compare the ARB specs with units such as the Viair, it beets or meets many (most?) of their models, models designed just to air up tires. In fact I can find a single Viair unit that has the same volume at 30psi as the CKM, most are half.
 
Last edited:

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Air Compressors

Well I need to make a decision about this compressor issue by first thing Monday morning so I can change to the smaller, less expensive pump if I want. It will save me about $100.00 which I could apply to another system.

Madizell, are you basing the poor performance of the older ARB pump on your 36" tires? The size of the tires being inflated certainly makes a big difference. The volume of air needed for one of those very large tires is probably double that of a 255/85R16?

Is the new CKMA12 ARB compressor with 2-CFM really that much less than an MV50? While the cheap MV50 is surely not as good as my tool-box Extreme Aire, it is sure a lot smaller, lighter, and nice to take along. For my 255/85 tires, the 'speed' of the MV50 is adequate.

I have a self assembled CO2 tank that I used for a while years ago, I just didn't like getting it refilled (exchange program), and the finite about of 'air'. Worst of all, it’s one more thing to load or mount for a trip. I never mounted it, just carried it in a tool box.

My preference and metal plan has been to add an Extreme Aire under the hood as a complete air system with a manifold for both lockers and tires. I'm not sure if I have the room (think I do) or exactly where & how I would mount it, but certainly it would be a very nice solution once figured out. It's weight (for mounting) and size are the biggest concerns.

I know a couple people who use the very small ARB pump only for their lockers and are very happy with this solution.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Thanks for this post. While not fast, it sounds like the new CKMA12 will be 'adequate' for airing my 255/85 tires, at least for now. If you can pump a 35" tire from 18 to 35 in 5-minutes or less then I will be able to take my 255/85 from 15 to 35 (or 10 to 30) in 5-minutes or less. Twenty minutes to do all my tires is acceptable and about what the MV50 does, maybe a little slower.

This CKMA12 is still not very physically large or heavy is it? I'm hoping to put it in one of the smaller spaces I have under the hood and keep my larger void open for other stuff.


cruiseroutfit said:
Not sure where your getting your numbers, but they are seriously flawed :D
http://www.arbusa.com/alac/alsp/6-07.pdf

18 amps for the RDCKA @ 1cfm vs 23 amps for the CKMA12 ~ 2.2cfm (both rates @ ~30psi). And double the duty cycle too (25% vs 50%). I've aired up a 35" from ~18psi to 35psi in under 5 mins, sure you have to wait, but I would go as far as to call it a marginal pump.

And to that, do amps really matter for a compressor? Its not like a fridge or light that your leaving on all night long, there should be little issue airing up 4 35" tires without the need to even consider starting the vehicle.

Just to be clear its not my chosen method for airing up (I run CO2) but its a great backup... and for many it has become their primary source of air. Can't say I've heard a complaint assuming they knew the facts ahead of time.



I'd have to assume your referring solely to the RDCKA here, the CKMA12 was entirely designed to do both, hence the increased pressure, volume and duty... otherwise they would have just stuck with the CKSA12 as the only offering. Compare the ARB specs with units such as the Viair, it beets or meets many (most?) of their models, models designed just to air up tires. In fact I can find a single Viair unit that has the same volume at 30psi as the CKM, most are half.
 

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
MV50 vs CKMA12
40% vs 50% duty cycle
30amps vs 23amps
2.54cfm vs 2.18


No two ways about it, the MV50 is the best bang for the buck out there, still amazed what a good deal those were (are?). Guys in our local club were scoring them for $25 on closeout at Checker :sombrero:

However, for use with an ARB, as chatted earlier the parts to mate the MV50 or any other compressor up to the ARB solenoids could easily exceed $100-150
 

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
Redline said:
...This CKMA12 is still not very physically large or heavy is it? I'm hoping to put it in one of the smaller spaces I have under the hood and keep my larger void open for other stuff.

Roughly the same size & weight as the MV50
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
So it puts out about 14% less CFM than the MV50.

I bet the difference in speed compared to the MV50 is more than made up for by not having to dig the MV50 out of a storage box and hook it up. Hitting the compressor switch and attaching a coiled air hose (kept handy/accessible) should greatly speed up the overall air-up time.

I wonder if the CKMA12 is more weather resistant (engine washing)?

cruiseroutfit said:
MV50 vs CKMA12
40% vs 50% duty cycle
30amps vs 23amps
2.54cfm vs 2.18


No two ways about it, the MV50 is the best bang for the buck out there, still amazed what a good deal those were (are?). Guys in our local club were scoring them for $25 on closeout at Checker :sombrero:

However, for use with an ARB, as chatted earlier the parts to mate the MV50 or any other compressor up to the ARB solenoids could easily exceed $100-150
 
Last edited:

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
Redline said:
...I wonder if the CKMA12 is more weather resistant (engine washing)?

Can't say for certain as I don't have too much exposure with either yet, the CKMA12 is ~1yr old. So far so good though, everyone I've mounted has been under a hood :D

The RDCKA held up exceptionally well under the hood, mines been under the hood of my 40 for over 7 years now, still working great. I should clarify, my RDCKA was rebuilt after a tragic water ingestion incident, its mounted @ ~40" inches off the ground, I entered a water crossing very slowly just to see how deep it was, my front end dipped in over the hood, leaning towards the side the pump was on. I decided not to cross, just as I put it in reverse to back out, the compressor cycled for a couple of seconds... that was the end of that one. I've since plumbed the inlet up higher using a fuel filter to replace the oe filter.
 

madizell

Explorer
cruiseroutfit said:
Not sure where your getting your numbers, but they are seriously flawed :D
http://www.arbusa.com/alac/alsp/6-07.pdf

18 amps for the RDCKA @ 1cfm vs 23 amps for the CKMA12 ~ 2.2cfm (both rates @ ~30psi). And double the duty cycle too (25% vs 50%). I've aired up a 35" from ~18psi to 35psi in under 5 mins, sure you have to wait, but I would go as far as to call it a marginal pump.

And to that, do amps really matter for a compressor? Its not like a fridge or light that your leaving on all night long, there should be little issue airing up 4 35" tires without the need to even consider starting the vehicle.

Just to be clear its not my chosen method for airing up (I run CO2) but its a great backup... and for many it has become their primary source of air. Can't say I've heard a complaint assuming they knew the facts ahead of time.



I'd have to assume your referring solely to the RDCKA here, the CKMA12 was entirely designed to do both, hence the increased pressure, volume and duty... otherwise they would have just stuck with the CKSA12 as the only offering. Compare the ARB specs with units such as the Viair, it beets or meets many (most?) of their models, models designed just to air up tires. In fact I can find a single Viair unit that has the same volume at 30psi as the CKM, most are half.

The figures I used are from the ARB website for the CKSA12 and CKMA12 pumps, as those are the two closest that I found to what we were discussing, but perhaps these two were not representative.

In fact, the pump I have is not even listed anymore, nor is the part number listed. Mine is either a first or second generation pump and is something like 8 years old. It has no model number on it, but lists performance specifications at "current load 20A @ 12V" and "flow: 24L @ 200 kPa."

These figures are close to the RDCKA currently listed. It is a compact pump, and not suited to airing tires of any size. I don't think anyone would truly disagree. The higher volume pump listed by ARB is only about twice the performance, but is not a compact pump, which limits your choices in mounting locations.

Keep in mind when comparing performance of air pumps that they are not always rated as they will be used. ARB is no different here. Although the CKMA12 is rated to provide a bit over 60L of air versus 28L, it does so at only 200kPa, which is under 30psi (29.007). Fair enough, but that's not usually where we start to stress the pump. As the resistance in the tire climbs due to increased pressures, the performance of the pump falls off dramatically while the electrical load increases. For purposes of airing lockers, these performance ratings are more than adequate because the volume of air needed is so tiny, but for airing tires, the ratings need to be compared carefully to what we actually need. An increase in pressure to 35psi (as mentioned in this string) is an increase of 20% (35psi = 241.3KPa) over the rating of any of the ARB pumps. Twenty percent is a significant increase in pressure, and you will find a correspondingly significant decrease in performance when trying for the higher pressure. However, ARB does not rate their pumps in the street pressure range, so we don't know how they will perform there comparatively. All I have to go on at that point is experience with a variety of trail airing tools.

Whether airing 36 inch tires is the issue or not, I doubt. I have used my ARB pump to air all kinds of tires to various pressures. The pump gets very hot, and it takes forever to air even 30 inch tires to road pressures, largely because of the extended time need to move that much air at higher pressures. My 36 inch Swampers were never aired above 20psi, and I have no real way to tell whether the volume of air needed to air the Swamper to 20psi is more or less than the amount needed to air a 255/75/16 to 35psi. Both tires are flexible pressure vessels. It would take direct experimentation with volume measuring equipment to tell which holds more air. Neither volume nor pressure standing alone are the problem, but rather the combination of the two that over burdens the pump. Airing any tire to 20psi is asking for less than the rating of any of the ARB pumps (all of which are rated at 29psi for rating purposes) yet airing tires to that pressure range overheated the pump every time.

Here, the discussion centers on whether a person can get a locker pump such as an ARB and use it to air tires. I suggested getting a tire airing pump and use it to run the lockers, and not use a locker pump to air tires. My reasoning is that the smaller pump can't take the abuse over time and should not be used for the larger task. It is simple to plumb a larger pump to air lockers, and the result is far more pleasant than spending a half hour airing tires. Whether ARB offers tire airing pumps is more or less a matter of personal perspective. My take on their ratings is that even their best pump would be marginal for airing tires.

Also keep in mind that whether we are looking at 13A of draw or 20A, we are talking about a dedicated automotive electrical circuit. Either rating will require heavy wiring, which most of the pump kits I have seen do not come with. If the wiring harness provided with the pump is intended to run lockers, it will be overly taxed if airing tires due to excess of duty cycle and accumulated heat. I have found it to be so. I had to change my ARB pump wiring to 10ga wire to handle the heat of airing tires, and I still melted fuses. I never blew the fuse, so amp draw was never exceeded, but I frequently melted the solder in the fuse rendering the pump useless. That takes a bit of heat, and I suggest that such heat is too much for an automotive circuit. So I stopped using the ARB pump for tires and now use it only as a back-up source for locker engagement because it does not have the duty cycle to handle the task of airing tires.

If all of our use of pumps were to take place in the driveway, it wouldn't matter all that much, but a pump failure in the bush is generally not acceptable, especially if you are trying to repair a flat rather than simply increasing pressures for road travel. (No ARB pump will re-seat a tire bead). I would rather have a fast and reliable means of airing tires, and not rely on a small pump with no more than a 50% duty cycle at best regardless of flow. So, if you don't have the room or the money for a full-on 100% duty cycle pump, I would still suggest a compact pump for the lockers (pick one) and an alternate source for the tires, such as CO2, as being far faster, more reliable, and cheaper in the end than using too small a pump do do all of the airing tasks faced on the trail.

Just my opinion.
 
Last edited:

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
madizell said:
...The figures I used are from the ARB website for the CKSA12 and CKMA12 pumps, as those are the two closest that I found to what we were discussing, but perhaps these two were not representative....

Not representative at all, your comparing the amp ratings of two very different pumps. As I've noted the amperage of the RDCKA is 20 and the CKMA12 is 23 amps. As you've noted even your compressor is just 3 less amps.

madizell said:
......Just my opinion.

Great opinion too, just different than mine and the customers that have used the pump in a fashion as it was intended. You've started expanding your reasoning to various other points just to justify your opinion, fine but at least use the modern offerings to compare against. We are not talking about the pre-RDCKA model that you have, we are not talking about the RDCKA, we are talking about their brand new models. I'm not here defending the older offerings and at the same time the thread wasn't asking about them either ;) To even imply they could have potential issues with wiring, solder, fuses, etc is misleading at best. I've never had a single RDCKA harness fail in that fashion, out of 100's sold I'd consider that a pretty reliable basis. The compressor wiring on a new CKMA12 is 5mm^2, which is 10 guage ;)

madizell said:
...However, ARB does not rate their pumps in the street pressure range, so we don't know how they will perform there comparatively. All I have to go on at that point is experience with a variety of trail airing tools.

We (as in me) do know how they will compare, and as I've noted I've found them tolerable as an air up device, even with 35's. Large tires are moot in this case anyhow, we can assert all the "what-ifs" in the world on the compressor, but the original poster has much smaller tires. While you seem to have alot of experience with airing tools... do any of them include the new ARB pump (CKMA12)??

Now if you have some information about the actual compressors in question (CKSA12 and CKMA12) proving they won't work as advertised nor meet the expectations I've found with them, I'd love to hear it. In the meantime we can agree to disagree and you can continue basing your experiences off of a 8+ yr old pump :D
 
Last edited:

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
madizell said:
...In fact, the pump I have is not even listed anymore, nor is the part number listed. Mine is either a first or second generation pump and is something like 8 years old. It has no model number on it, but lists performance specifications at "current load 20A @ 12V" and "flow: 24L @ 200 kPa."...

Is this what your ARB compressor looks like?

ARBcomp3.jpg


This is the predecessor of the RDCKA, still working when removed ~3 years ago (was 12 years old), only used for ARB operation though, no fittings for OBA. It was replaced it with the RDCKA. Its a paperweight on a shelf now :D
 

madizell

Explorer
cruiseroutfit said:
Great opinion too, just different than mine and the customers that have used the pump in a fashion as it was intended. ....... I've never had a single RDCKA harness fail in that fashion, out of 100's sold...

/QUOTE]

So, you're a dealer in this product?
 

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
madizell said:
...So, you're a dealer in this product?

Yes, Cruiser Outfitters has been selling/installing ARB systems for ~20 years, I've been personally involved for ~8 years now. I try to leave my biases aside, we are also a dealer for lots of other compressor systems too, none of which I have made mention in this thread ;)
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
One website I looked at says the CKMA12 "high output" (yes, we all know it is NOT :) has a rating of 2.18 CFM at 29-psi. Luckily for me 29-psi is enough psi for my tires for the load they carry.

I would love to spend my money on another Extreme Aire and throw it under the hood. But like the owner of Extreme Outback likes to say, 'size matters'. In this instance, the size of the Extreme Aire is too large to easily fit in the hole I have inside my engine compartment. Could I make it fit, maybe, but it would probably need a custom bracket to support the weight.

After taking a few measurements, the new, higher output ARB compressor will easily fit on the passenger side inner fender, behind the factory air-box of my 4Runner. It's weight of only 10-lbs shouldn't be a problem bolted to the relatively thin metal of the inner fender. I'm anxious to see how the pump works for my tires, but for about 30-psi on my 255s I think it will be okay. We shall see.

When I plan and configure my rear hatch cargo containers for longer trips (soon) I may try to make space for my CO2 tank. I think I will be able to use the ARB pump for tires (and it will be in the engine bay everyday without having to be loaded!), easily carry an MV-50 as a cheap backup, but neither of these are good for reseating a bead. I don't have nor do I plan to go to bead-locks. CO2 would be the best tool for this possible job as well as a super way to inflate tires. Having said this, I run some pretty low pressures and have only lost a bead once.

An MV-50 or Extreme Aire mounted in the nose box of my Chaser would be a nice addition. But I'm slightly hesitant to hard mount much to the Chaser as I'm excited about the prospect of the concept AT clamshell trailer.
 

SinCity4r

Adventurer
James, where are you having your gears and lockers installed? Are you have them use a solid pinion spacer? Thanks.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,801
Messages
2,921,068
Members
232,931
Latest member
Northandfree
Top