off-roader
Expedition Leader
I do agree that companies should not copy other companies work and should come up with their own product designs.
I'm not sure how valid the spare parts argument is. The last I checked (admittedly over a year ago now) you couldn't order a spare safari snorkel head (top most portion) and instead had to purchase a whole snorkel if you say accidentally lost it when it unknowingly came loose on the trail. I spoke with them directly (was difficult at that time to obtain their number but I did) and they told me that in Australia they consider the cost of a new snorkel insignificant as the reason they didn't sell the various parts separately. :Wow1: Talk about leaving a sour taste in my mouth. Perhaps they've changed this policy.
Also last I checked I had to source parts to mate the snorkel to my airbox (US Spec 1990 Montero v6) because they didn't include that in their installation kit! It's pathetic that they don't and I have to find the necessary parts locally to do this. That said, THERE IS A LOT OF ROOM for improvement from Safari.
Now I certainly agree that cheap plastic knock offs are not something we want to see, but what we do need are a decent number of alternative choices to a current product monopoly which is NEVER good for a free market society.
While I don't have a Safari snorkel I do have a 'cheap' asian knock off of an Airflow snorkel which IMHO is actually superior to the either the Airflow and Safari models because it's made of easily repairable Fiberglass (see any boat shop) while just as strong as non repairable plastics of the Airflow/Safari units.
While I wish the manufacturer of my snorkel made his own design instead of copying the Airflow design, I see it being the lesser of 2 evils (costly monopoly versus competition forcing manufacturers to offer less expensive & superior snorkels).
Just my $.02
I'm not sure how valid the spare parts argument is. The last I checked (admittedly over a year ago now) you couldn't order a spare safari snorkel head (top most portion) and instead had to purchase a whole snorkel if you say accidentally lost it when it unknowingly came loose on the trail. I spoke with them directly (was difficult at that time to obtain their number but I did) and they told me that in Australia they consider the cost of a new snorkel insignificant as the reason they didn't sell the various parts separately. :Wow1: Talk about leaving a sour taste in my mouth. Perhaps they've changed this policy.
Also last I checked I had to source parts to mate the snorkel to my airbox (US Spec 1990 Montero v6) because they didn't include that in their installation kit! It's pathetic that they don't and I have to find the necessary parts locally to do this. That said, THERE IS A LOT OF ROOM for improvement from Safari.
Now I certainly agree that cheap plastic knock offs are not something we want to see, but what we do need are a decent number of alternative choices to a current product monopoly which is NEVER good for a free market society.
While I don't have a Safari snorkel I do have a 'cheap' asian knock off of an Airflow snorkel which IMHO is actually superior to the either the Airflow and Safari models because it's made of easily repairable Fiberglass (see any boat shop) while just as strong as non repairable plastics of the Airflow/Safari units.
While I wish the manufacturer of my snorkel made his own design instead of copying the Airflow design, I see it being the lesser of 2 evils (costly monopoly versus competition forcing manufacturers to offer less expensive & superior snorkels).
Just my $.02
Last edited: