(PS - there are no 'channels' in amateur radio.)
.
Just a few thought I've had....
It is pretty true about the sorts of discussions on ham, but its just ******** chat on par with any other form of communication with strangers as said already in this thread
I have not seen any bullying to new hams on repeaters in socal, but I'm sure its out there somewhere. I wouldn't take more then one bad egg to ruin a repeter.
The thing I find most interesting about ham right now is that "tradition hams" are no longer growing. Radio shack is bankrupt and internet is now used to connect the world. What is growing is ham by offroaders. My perspective is limited but I can't think of any other category of growth ham may have seen in the last 20 years.
I've donated to a local repeater and make it known that the radio lives in my 4x4. I think the future of ham is offroaders. I predict 4x4 clubs will be maintaining repeaters in the next 20 years. Well, unless sat phones become cheap lol
I agree about the 4x4 thing but think the hobby would reach a larger audience with hikers.
There's a whole subset of ham operators that hike (backpack) up mountains and operate portable with batteries on or near the summit. Mostly low-power HF, but some VHF too. Looks like a lot of fun. I have talked to several from my home HF station.
Summits On The Air. It's a great way to combine ham radio with getting exercise. I've activated via bicycling, AT skiing, and hiking to mountain tops.
And the best reason most folks can come up with for doing the right thing is "because it's the law" and we'll ruin your life if you don't comply. It is axiomatically assumed that the added benefits of range and power are enough to compel new users to comply. Well, apparently not.
Just my two cents as a relatively new Baofeng owner:
I'm about to turn 50, so I'm either already in the "crusty old geezer" category or soon to fall into it, yet I have yet to get my Tech license. I've registered at QRZ.com and have handily passed multiple practice tests, yet I still haven't done the deed. Why?
Procrastination is the most likely answer, but the bigger reason is that I sympathize to a certain degree with the banned OP of the recently closed thread. The ham/FCC community is not to my liking, and it has nothing to do with boring weather conversations. The only thing ARRL, Hams, and the FCC have to offer is 100% stick and 0% carrot. There are many alternatives to acquiring a ham license ranging from simply using a cell phone where available and the free to use CB/FRS possiblities. And the best reason most folks can come up with for doing the right thing is "because it's the law" and we'll ruin your life if you don't comply. It is axiomatically assumed that the added benefits of range and power are enough to compel new users to comply. Well, apparently not.
If all that ham licensing has to offer is a reduced threat of legal action, that probably won't cut it in the current regime of relatively lax enforcement as it is. And heaven help those that instinctively will respond calls for radically increased heavy handed enforcement - that was tried sporadically in '76 with the CB bands and failed miserably.
The Chinese have opened the door via low prices for many, many new radio operators. It is up to the radio community to figure out how to embrace them or run the very real risk of becoming extinct or at best irrelevant.
Just my two cents as a relatively new Baofeng owner:
I'm about to turn 50, so I'm either already in the "crusty old geezer" category or soon to fall into it, yet I have yet to get my Tech license. I've registered at QRZ.com and have handily passed multiple practice tests, yet I still haven't done the deed. Why?
Procrastination is the most likely answer, but the bigger reason is that I sympathize to a certain degree with the banned OP of the recently closed thread. The ham/FCC community is not to my liking, and it has nothing to do with boring weather conversations. The only thing ARRL, Hams, and the FCC have to offer is 100% stick and 0% carrot. There are many alternatives to acquiring a ham license ranging from simply using a cell phone where available and the free to use CB/FRS possiblities. And the best reason most folks can come up with for doing the right thing is "because it's the law" and we'll ruin your life if you don't comply. It is axiomatically assumed that the added benefits of range and power are enough to compel new users to comply. Well, apparently not.
If all that ham licensing has to offer is a reduced threat of legal action, that probably won't cut it in the current regime of relatively lax enforcement as it is. And heaven help those that instinctively will respond calls for radically increased heavy handed enforcement - that was tried sporadically in '76 with the CB bands and failed miserably.
The Chinese have opened the door via low prices for many, many new radio operators. It is up to the radio community to figure out how to embrace them or run the very real risk of becoming extinct or at best irrelevant.
. . . I have yet to get my Tech license. . . . Why? Procrastination is the most likely answer, but the bigger reason is that I sympathize to a certain degree with the banned OP of the recently closed thread. The ham/FCC community is not to my liking, and it has nothing to do with boring weather conversations. The only thing ARRL, Hams, and the FCC have to offer is 100% stick and 0% carrot. . . . .