Nothing Special
New member
Can't be all things to all people. I personally like the fact they are building a smaller, more soft road SUV. Admit it or not, I think it will be more capable than most need.
Than most? Yep. I would agree.Can't be all things to all people. I personally like the fact they are building a smaller, more soft road SUV. Admit it or not, I think it will be more capable than most need.
No. The Bronco II had a transfer case. Let’s be real;Bronco II 2.0.
No. The Bronco II had a transfer case. Let’s be real;
Bronco Sport = Ford Escape 2.0
I think the Bronco Sport is just a smaller vehicle. It's ~172 in long, while the Outback is 191. If you don't need the extra length, a smaller vehicle is much more convenient for a lot of things, esp. if you live in a city. The extra length is largely in the overhangs as well, so despite the Outback Wilderness being jacked up a bit and having higher ground clearance, the approach/departure angles on the Bronco Sport are a lot better. And despite being a much larger vehicle, you don't get basically any extra cargo space with the Subaru, with both vehicles featuring 32.5 cubic feet behind the second row of seats and the Bronco Sport's boxy cargo area likely being a bit more useable for adventure gear (though to be fair, I think the 2.0l versions of the Bronco Sport have a small amount less). With all seats folded, the Outback does have a 10 cu ft advantage, but again, the Bronco Sport has a boxier cargo area, which I generally prefer as I pack my gear in stacking tubs. The Outback has 2.5 in more rear legroom.I think it's real competitor to the badlands version (fully optioned) would be the 2022 Subaru Outback Wilderness, and for the same amount of money you get more power, more room, more ground clearance, more towing capacity, better safety (IMO), and better resale value.
The Bronco Sport looks a hell of a lot better to me than the Outback, that's the only reason I can see taking one over the Outback Wilderness.