The nuanced details that they go into are just not a factor in the real world.
There are different use cases and levels of care.
> It seems, to me, like they're just trying to push a sales agenda.
Some may, I sell nothing.
> I see little value in using the vehicle alternator or any other source to charge the STARTING battery and then use a DC DC (12v to 12v) charger to tap into the STARTING battery and use it to charge the HOUSE bank. As I said before you're not going to get away without losing energy through inefficiencies.
Yes the ideal is a proper regulator and output to House, but if that costs $1500 while the DCDC only $800, latter gives more flexibility. All depends.
> And the idea that most alternators can't even sustain an output when they get hot, is ridiculous. They're rated output is what's listed on them and that is good up through some very high engine compartment temperatures.
Only in some, IME very rare, cases. Easy enough to test for any given vehicle, if rated at 120A, put a 100A load on for two hours of high enough rpm and watch V, A and temps.
> manufacturers have designed these alternator to operate in extremes of temperatures in most places that you would ever find a vehicle.
Yes but only handling propulsion and Starter bat, a tiny fraction of large-bank deep cycling, especially high-CAR recharging.
LFP is famous for burning out alts.
> With regards to voltage versus amps...it's the AMPS that create the heat and losses. it is important to remember that INCREASING the VOLTAGE allows us to DECREASE the AMPERAGE required of a particular power transfer scheme.
> which will have an alternator restricted Max voltage of around 13.8 to 14.2v
We don't have choices here. The expensive House bank has a spec charging profile which must be matched for longevity. If the spec is 14.8V IMO you'd be stupid to accept less, measured at the bank posts.
> If you want to use a DC to DC (12v to 12v) charger, put the charger closest to the SOURCE battery
Fine if you can afford the huge wire gauge to eliminate voltage drop, or your regulator has a dedicated voltage sense wire. Usually next to Target bank makes more sense.
> But as I said before, I don't think a DC DC (12v to 12v) charger is a necessity for the cost and scarce real estate available in most vehicles.
True, most owners don't even care if they only get 3-4 years from their bank rather than 8-10.
> I think your money would be better spent on an isolator (separating STARTING from HOUSE batteries)
That's usually assumed, not an either/or choice in many cases
> and a sophisticated external regulator to drive your alternator.
But costs do come into it too. The DCDC can travel with the bank, service various different charge sources, very often Alternator is hardly even a significant source overall anyway.
In many cases a sophisticated VR and a DCDC unit are both required.
All depends on the requirements of a given rig and usage patterns.