plainjaneFJC
Deplorable
I should have figured "feeling the need" was code for something.
Code for what? You must know what the OP doesn't?
I should have figured "feeling the need" was code for something.
An opposing view: I don't know where you camped and I don't know the "nitwit" in question but.....A) around here there are other things in the woods with teeth and claws besides the camp Pooch, and B) it was in his hand, which in and of itself means only that he was prepared for a potential (in his mind) threat. If it was in his hand and blasting away at something yet unseen or unrecognized, that would make him a nitwit +.
Personally, I see little point to this thread other than to generate conflict. Me, or the OP, having the knowledge of how others feel on this subject matters not one bit. It's about like asking how others feel about sharing a campfire with a Catholic or Protestant. Inflammatory and useless.
I am not afraid of guns.I am afraid of people though.As soon as I see somebody out in the woods openly brandishing a weapon I have to pay special attention to that person.The gun is not going to do something stupid or worse, the damn person is.
It would be a touchy subject. I think for me the big thing is I wouldn't let my son go to someones house unless I know them well enough to ask those questions. I'd be worried about other things first, but the gun issue would be in the back of my mind as well.
You certainly make a valid point. Not that I necessarily advocate more regulation, but I still find it surprising that carrying a pistol does not require a minimum level of proficiency and a background check. I am 100% pro 2nd amendment, but there should be an expectation of proficiency. I would like to know that if I see a guy carrying a gun that he has been through training and a background check.
Obviously, this can't happen because most gun owners (myself included) do not trust the intentions of the anti-gun community. If there was a consensus that the law abiding will not lose rights, but must show proficiency and prove that they are law abiding, I see that as 100% reasonable. I prefered the old CCW requirements in AZ. If someone was carrying concealed, they were either LEO or had passed a two day course, a test and a range qualification. Now any idiot can shove a pistol in their pocket. . .
It would be a touchy subject. I think for me the big thing is I wouldn't let my son go to someones house unless I know them well enough to ask those questions. I'd be worried about other things first, but the gun issue would be in the back of my mind as well.
Very valid point, I remember the days when parents actually knew each other well enough that this wouldn't even be an issue.