Maybe the objections stem from the term "Jeeping"? Not really sure. Some of his statements are actually ignorant; implying that those who choose to do those types of trails don't care about the natural world was ridiculous. Every group that uses our resources has its few people who are irresponsible turds! That doesn't mean that all of the people of that group are that way. I have come across hikers, bikers, and offroad motorists that treat the planet like their personal trash can.
That being said some the reactions to the article make me think the responders did not read it thoroughly. He prefaces his article with the following statement: “These are the trails on which you often find cut-up Toyotas, Land Rovers, and yes Jeeps, slowly crawling over big rocks for the sole purpose of saying they did”
So he doesn’t see that point of running a trail just because of the obstacles. I don’t either. I don’t go to offroad parks because I have no interest in just driving over obstacles. I drive off road to get to a scenic view, historical site, etc. I looked at that first picture in the article and thought it would suck to drive that! If there was something on the other side I really wanted to see I would do it, but I wouldn’t do it just for fun.
It is amusing how crazed some people get when they think you are attacking their beloved preferred brand. No matter what it is, if someone thinks you are bashing it a certain number of people will get their panties in a wad. He doesn’t even bash the vehicle. In fact he lists it in the sub-title as a reason to have high expectations for the day.
Also, nowhere does he imply he wanted a Five-Star Hotel or a KOA.
Bash him all you want for the ignorant trash and teenager statements, but don’t expose your own ignorance by going off on him for being a Jeep hater or wanting luxury accommodations!