I heard there is a night and day difference between the ride of these two vehicles and the G-wagon was not on the favorable side....
Obviously there's a big difference. The Range Rover has a modern air suspension and the G-wagon has pretty much the original coil spring and solid axle setup it had when they started building them back in 1979. But the G-wagon handles perfectly fine. I'm also a lot happier with it overall. You could try both out and come to the same conclusion or end up preferring the Range Rover and I wouldn't say you were right or wrong either way.
The Range Rover had several initial quality issues, one of which could have left me stranded in the middle of nowhere (the shift knob that comes up out of the center console before you can use it was malfunctioning) and 2 of which shouldn't have made it past quality control at the factory or the dealership (an obviously defective speaker and the hood latch wasn't latching fully on the passenger side - it took the dealer TWO tries to get the latch fixed). The heavy use of the touch screen interface for many simple operations was driving me nuts after living with it for a few months - something that one isn't likely to notice on a test drive. Don't get me wrong - it's a FINE vehicle and there were most definitely many aspects of it that I absolutely loved.
The G-wagon has been flawless so far.
Isn't it wonderful that we have choices so that each person can get the vehicle that best suits their needs?
And let's please not derail Chris's thread with a debate over which is better as they're both great vehicles. I would recommend that anyone considering either try to test drive both before making a decision and pay close attention to details such as how things like the heating controls work and how responsive the screen displays are. If possible, spend some real quality time with each to explore the various features - not just a 15-20 minute test drive around a canned test loop. These are expensive purchases, so it makes sense to really know what you're getting.