... Cheap for such an expensive car.
Ahahahaha no the sport was cheap cost wise and feels expensivenot the other way round
Assuming Land Rover continues to improve and become more consistent with their reliability, I wonder if that will start to change and they'll start to hold their values better.So it feels expensive, but became cheap very quickly...
Well, I traded my 2014 Range Rover in for a 2014 G-wagon, so Land Rover values aren't my highest priority now.I wouldnt be surprised if that becomes the trend. But dont worry about matt. Hes just sore he sold his Series and now had a Jeepeepwall:
Well, I traded my 2014 Range Rover in for a 2014 G-wagon, so Land Rover values aren't my highest priority now.![]()
Obviously there's a big difference. The Range Rover has a modern air suspension and the G-wagon has pretty much the original coil spring and solid axle setup it had when they started building them back in 1979. But the G-wagon handles perfectly fine. I'm also a lot happier with it overall. You could try both out and come to the same conclusion or end up preferring the Range Rover and I wouldn't say you were right or wrong either way.I heard there is a night and day difference between the ride of these two vehicles and the G-wagon was not on the favorable side....
Assuming Land Rover continues to improve and become more consistent with their reliability, I wonder if that will start to change and they'll start to hold their values better.
Well, I traded my 2014 Range Rover in for a 2014 G-wagon, so Land Rover values aren't my highest priority now.![]()
I was speaking about the brand in a general sense, not about specific models. The current Range Rover actually has amazing resale value for the short term due to supply/demand. I think we all know that strong resale values, at least in the USA, have not been one of Land Rover's strong suits over the years, at least in part due to quality control issues.For many years the RRS has held the title of best resale value for a luxury SUV.