Thanks. The only thing I might want to compromise on, I think, is getting a DRW (if everything else checks out fine and it's an attractive deal) instead of an SRW, though an SRW would be ideal for my purposes.
The reason for my willingness to compromise on this point runs along these lines: I'm thinking that, if I do so, I could run it for a while as an SRW by removing the inner rear wheels and then, when ready to do a rear axle swap to convert it to proper SRW, I can simply remove the rear dually flaps and thus instantly be able to run large tires.....which is what Metcalf advises in his DoItAll Dodge thread in this forum for running larger wheels (I'm really inspired by his build). This way, I'd have to worry only about creating the necessary space in the front for the large tires.
In re: running a DRW truck with only two rear wheels, look for instance at Carlyle's F550 build.. He got a brand new Ford F550 (dually truck), promptly removed the inner rear wheels, mounted much larger tires on the external rear wheels, placed a flatbed on it and had a 14' 3" Alaskan camper custom built for it....He's been traveling all over the US for the past six years with this setup (running only two rear wheels on a dually truck). There are also plenty of other guys running their dually trucks this way. Also, this is what Earthroamer has done for years with their Ford F550 EarthRoamer XV-LT model http://www.earthroamer.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/delivery-photo-in-front-of-ER-sign.jpg
Some people have advised against my doing so when it comes to a 1st gen Dodge. What do you guys think in this regard?
I have thought about running the outer wheels only, but when my camper is on, the extra safety factor is nice to have. I don't plan on doing much serious off roading with the Dodge, and in almost every other circumstance for me, the dual rears are an advantage.
I know what you are saying. I have read numerous reports on fuel economy where there is only +/- 1 mpg difference with both duals versus singles (on the same truck). You would need to drives ton of milesat 1 mpg to pay for any damage caused by running a single rear. Unless of course you buy wheels with a different offset. It would also take a lot of miles at 1 mpg to pay off a new set of wheels. This is assuming fuel economy is the main reason you would go single.
With the right wheels you might not have to convert to SRW. You could just leave it.
It would be interesting to see how a set of the H1 hummer wheels fit with the 7" backspacing on the dually axles. The front might end up a touch wider than you would like but then again maybe not. You can get the 37" BFG baja hummer tire now. If you could use unmodified steel H1 hummer wheels that might be a really good budget way to get larger tires.
http://www.trailworthyfab.com/Tires/
Anyone have any firm numbers on the DRW axle widths? SRW is about 67.5" in front and 65" on the rear axle.
Yet another solution to your SRW/DRW dilemma was dealt with by Stockton Wheel, and similar businesses, many years ago when they made Super Single wheels. Big rigs have used these for several years, too:
View attachment 158741
My Chevy had 33x12.5-16.5 tires in front and 255/85-16 tires in rear. I would question that a Dana 70 has less maintenance needs than a 14-bolt GM axle, not understanding the logic there. Running single dually wheels on the rear axle is a last resort thing to me based on the lug issue first, appearance second.
When I was able to drive my 77 Dodge around, I didn't have any driveability issues specifically caused by the duals. My work at the time was earthwork projects. However, my truck was a full-time unit with 4.88 gears...averaged about 3 mpg on the highway. Someone wanted the truck more than I did, and sadly departed with my truck, about $4000 in tools, and all the equipment I had in the service body. Since 1998, I have missed this truck:
View attachment 158744