Don't want this to launch off into a discussion about van, but when I see $100 - $150K being asked for just the build out on a new Transit or Mercedes that costs $50 - $70K I'm frankly mystified. In most instances, there's not even a dealer in the middle taking their slice of the markup.
I'm not saying no windows or even not enough windows. I'm just saying "enough" is a personal choice. For us, five smaller ones is plenty. We full time in our trailer, so it's a different issue for us and fewer/smaller windows work better. Having fewer windows is better for privacy, for security, for resistance to cold and hot weather, for maintenance , for structural strength, and for longevity of the trailer. As an example, for us, the big Kimberleys have way too many windows. It seems like they replaced both of the entire sides of the trailer with windows. Similar case for In Tech. If you camp 365 days a year, you don't stress much over being able to sit inside your trailer and soak up the views. ?
Where's the FB post on this? So far they have just played fast and loose with the pricing for all these models with no explanations. That's typically a sign of new product pricing based on what the marketing department thinks the customer will pay rather than what manufacturing and finance have determined the cost and fair mark-up to be.
I think one of the biggest disappointments for purchasers of the $150k+ trailers will be the solar system. They are claiming a very large and complex system can be installed in those trailers. Those systems require very specialized knowledge to spec and install correctly/safely in small spaces. I think a lot of those buyers will be, at best, wondering why the system isn't performing up to par, and at worst, wondering why did it fail completely. I base that opinion on all of the comments I've read online from current X22 owners having issues with their small to mid-sized basic solar systems.