Buddha.
Finally in expo white.
This guy was ordering a run of aluminum super single wheels.
Last edited:
Is that 1350 per wheel?This guy was ordering a run of aluminum super single wheels.
Amen on the "O" rings! Gotta carry spares!
Hutchinson wheels are not in and of themselves a Band-Aid, indeed, I tried to get them for my truck - they wouldn't sell to me. Running them without the proper lift/shocks/flares/etc. might be. The RAM is not set up for 335 tires from the factory. Hence my inclination for a systems approach. Again, no personal experience with Buckstops.
Cannot recommend Stazworks.
View attachment 681835
Probably
I'm looking at aluminum MRAPs in good shape for $1200 for a set of 5. No possible way I could justify the additional 5k to go that route lol
If the MRAP wheels are just unmodified surplus, they're designed for a larger tire than what you will run on the Ram. The lip on the ring doesn't fit the bead right on a 335/80R20 wheel and most will machine down the lip to fit correctly.
The wheel Stazworks sells is a MRAP aluminum wheel with the correct center to match the offset you want. They also machine the lip for 335s. I compared all of the options and considered getting surplus MRAP wheels until I spoke to someone here who had them on an f450 and advised against them due to the lip and spacer issues. I really like Hutchinson MRAP wheels because they're super strong, easily serviceable and well made. I also think it's important to have a shop properly configure and recondition the wheels before installing them on your truck. Once you mount and install the tires, you realize they're not something you want to cut corners on.
The Michelin military/offroad tire catalog doesn’t approve 20x10.00 wheels (like the common MRAP Hutchinsons) for 335/80R20s. They do approve certain 9 and 11” wheels and also “W10” and DW10”. Don’t know the specific reasons and differences. Might be the bead area.I'm not sure I fully understand the "lip issue". The "12.5" Continental MPT 81 should be proper width for a 20x10 Hutchinson MRAP. The bead profile should be the same considering theyre both military application. Why does the 335 measurement prevent an unmodified MRAP from being used?
I'm not sure I fully understand the "lip issue". The "12.5" Continental MPT 81 should be proper width for a 20x10 Hutchinson MRAP. The bead profile should be the same considering theyre both military application. Why does the 335 measurement prevent an unmodified MRAP from being used?
I was just going to mention this bead face issue but it has been flagged a lot here and two other forums by multiple members so I assume it's a real thing. Stazworks has had issues (see Diplostrats post) with their fully custom setups but I've heard no complaints of their modified MRAP wheels. I struggle-fested with this for months and came to Buckstop or Staz. Spacers and multi-piece wheels sound great in theory but multiple pieces and parts introduce multiple potential modes of failure and complexity. I don't like spacers. Get a setup that just goes dish in, dish out front and back for simplicity, not necessarily for identical track width (although that is nice). Truth is your track will never be perfectly straight unless you are going perfectly straight.
I ended up buying a Buckstop set here on expedition portal with tires for a smoking deal. Just watch the market they are our there if you are willing to go used.
I'm not sure I fully understand the "lip issue". The "12.5" Continental MPT 81 should be proper width for a 20x10 Hutchinson MRAP. The bead profile should be the same considering theyre both military application. Why does the 335 measurement prevent an unmodified MRAP from being used?
The Stazworks modified MRAPS are just standard Hutchinsons with the machined bead "lip"? I'm certainly willing to go used, was extremely close to buying standard Hutchinson MRAPS last week but wanted to do my due diligence to make sure I was buying the right setup.