txfactor76
Observer
I haven't experienced anything that makes me regret running 33s. I think the difference in overall diameter and weight is so slight that there's no appreciable difference when it comes to overstressing the suspension. I've got nearly 40k miles on my 255/85 KM2s and apart from being seriously underpowered (I have the VG33), I wouldn't have it any other way. I'm on KYB struts and AC coils, but still on original ball joints (200k miles); I'd be on original tie rod ends if I didn't massively tweak one during a past excursion. Everything is still nice and tight, and I'm not what you would call a light-footed driver on or off the road.
Long story short, I'm not afraid of any pothole, nor is my Pathfinder.
There's nothing wrong with 32s. Most R50s with small lifts like ours, are running them. I would go with the 265/75 though. The 235/85 is pretty popular among the expo crowd, but that's just too dang narrow for my taste.
If you can trial fit some 33s, that would be your best bet. Your truck is too nice to be hammering on those fenders lol
BTW, my username is 'alexrex20' on pretty much every other forum, in case you recognize my Pathfinder. I used to have a login here but I can't seem to access it.
Long story short, I'm not afraid of any pothole, nor is my Pathfinder.
There's nothing wrong with 32s. Most R50s with small lifts like ours, are running them. I would go with the 265/75 though. The 235/85 is pretty popular among the expo crowd, but that's just too dang narrow for my taste.
If you can trial fit some 33s, that would be your best bet. Your truck is too nice to be hammering on those fenders lol
BTW, my username is 'alexrex20' on pretty much every other forum, in case you recognize my Pathfinder. I used to have a login here but I can't seem to access it.
Last edited: