The real weight is on the vin sticker on the exterior of the unit.Personally, I think the whole camper industry needs to change and be force to post the ACTUAL full wet weight of each camper, as it is leaving the factory. No guesstimates, no basic, stripped model weights but with whatever has been installed in that specific camper, full of water, propane, batteries, etc. and weigh it before it can be allowed to be sold to the customer.
This would allow people to know exactly what they are buying, weight wise and make informed choices.
The real weight is on the vin sticker on the exterior of the unit.
I've owned 2 of them and while they have their own unique issues they were way better then the old stick built, pink fiberglass insulated, aluminum cladded designs. NL and Bigfoot don't fall apart under normal use.I wonder if it's easier to keep the tanks 4 season rated ? Plus that's the way they build their campers. And looks like you might get some kind of long drawer storage, which is nice if sticking with a PU box. Interior head room will be better for sure
I looked at some new NLs recently. Looked pretty good. Have read on here that mainstream stuff is all junk and will fall apart after a few years. Don't know about that, looking at the NLs. I do see old ones still going around.
And I've read on here some pricing for buying a composite shell and building it out. Don't know about some of those numbers, having priced out a build myself. Once you get someone else involved, or go custom, up goes the cost.
Any word on pricing for this unit?
NLs have a rep for being expensive. 2024s are ~55 to 66K USD equivalent here in BC. New 2023s on the lot are less.
Still have to believe they are value for some folks.
And less space in the sleeping berth.Regarding the 610 going on a half ton, I'd rather it be 10" lower without a basement. Lower CG and less wind resistance.
I liked the old 8.5' Q lite and 9.5' lite series 1725 Dry weight.And less space in the sleeping berth.
I'm not sure how all you couples are managing it, but I designed mine for NS sleeping (so both could get in an out without crawling over the other) and enough headroom for "romantic exploits"... and a taller flatbed style made the most sense.
The 610 needs to be a slide-in though (inherently lower)... and so a basement isn't that silly. But since it's made in a mold they could have easily shaped it to be more aero and just have stand-up height in the center. Also, I'd prefer that they hug the cab for the "lowest" of the 1/2 tons, and the others can easily raise it with a sheet of foam.
What is the construction method and insulative qualities on the Nucamp? They have a slick looking modern finish but that could be out of style quickly.As it stands, the Nucamp 620 with a north/south bed, a dinette that can actually work as a bed for a 3rd person, more windows, and cabinets that aren’t in that awful light maple looks like a better choice. Bummer as I was optimistic this would be more compelling than it turned out