Older Toyota PU Question...

I assume half the board knows more about Toyotas than I do, but I was thinking my friend's 4Runner was an '87 and that that was the last year.
 
No it was 85.

Here's a photo of a much younger me and my then-new 85 Toyota Hilux:

85TOY.jpg


I for one don't join in the general obsession with SAS. In fact, I recall that when Toyota announced in 85 that the 86 truck and 4runner would have IFS, it was generally hailed as a much needed modernization.

My first 4 4x4s were SAS and the one thing I remember most is that driving them on washboard roads was terrible. IFS is a huge improvement for anything other than super-hardcore rock crawling.
 
Not saying that I would turn up my nose at one if it were offered to me but.... I love my 2001 Tacoma. My brother has a '85 Four runner. He gets lots of jelous looks from other wheelers.

REX
 
Martinjmpr said:
No it was 85.

Here's a photo of a much younger me and my then-new 85 Toyota Hilux:

85TOY.jpg


I for one don't join in the general obsession with SAS. In fact, I recall that when Toyota announced in 85 that the 86 truck and 4runner would have IFS, it was generally hailed as a much needed modernization.

My first 4 4x4s were SAS and the one thing I remember most is that driving them on washboard roads was terrible. IFS is a huge improvement for anything other than super-hardcore rock crawling.
NICE YOTA HILUX!
 
I've an '84 and the PO told me that EFI was optional then. Became std in '85 with a carb being the option until something like '89. So don't just assume that '85-up automatically equals EFI.
The PO's dad bought Patch new and wisely, I think, opted out of the first year of EFI. I do wish Patch had EFI, but I don't think that the first year of anything new like that is a great idea.

Adding Bils 5100's on All Poo hoops uterly transformed Patch's wash board ride. Prior the ride was so bad that I had thot of selling the truck. It was that bad. With this damper set-up on the front and some 7100's & 63's on the rear I can give the wannabe pre-rnnr's a run for their money. I'm not going to be able to stay with a serious pre-rnnr, but then it's not a serious pre-rnnr either.
 
Martinjmpr said:
No it was 85.

Here's a photo of a much younger me and my then-new 85 Toyota Hilux:

85TOY.jpg


I for one don't join in the general obsession with SAS. In fact, I recall that when Toyota announced in 85 that the 86 truck and 4runner would have IFS, it was generally hailed as a much needed modernization.

My first 4 4x4s were SAS and the one thing I remember most is that driving them on washboard roads was terrible. IFS is a huge improvement for anything other than super-hardcore rock crawling.

It is funny how we think people always had it better back in the day. I remember when I was a kid and my dad a very nice 1979 lifted chevy pickup with Dana 60 up front. Many years later he sold it and bought a 1991 chevy 3/4 ton 4x4 IFS which was a 'much' better truck, and like you said, much easier to drive on washboard roads.

Now looking back that old chev' was super cool and very desirable, not so much with the 91'. People are always going to want what they can't have and the grass is ALWAYS greener.

PS-that is a sweet rig you got there. I bet at the time you didnt know you were sitting on a rig that was going to be one of the most desirable 4x4's ever. Still got it?
 
Last edited:
ntsqd said:
I've an '84 and the PO told me that EFI was optional then. Became std in '85 with a carb being the option until something like '89. So don't just assume that '85-up automatically equals EFI.
EFI was optional on the 4Runner in 1984, standard in 1985 and up. EFI was still only optional on the pickup until at least 1988 AFAIK. I think it wasn't until the 1989 trucks that EFI was standard on all trucks. I think at some point SR5 trucks got EFI automatically, though. Basically, I think it's the other way, the 22R was standard and the 22R-E was an option. But you are right that up until 1989 it was possible that a truck could have a 22R. My buddy's 1986 4WD long bed was a 22R, for example.
 
hinoranger said:
I assume half the board knows more about Toyotas than I do, but I was thinking my friend's 4Runner was an '87 and that that was the last year.
85 and 87 are the same body style considered the First Gen. 89 was the start of the 2nd gen.

Unless you plan to rock crawl then don't let the IFS scare you away. The IFS with just a couple upgrades is very stout and for anything other then hard core rock crawling it will get the job done. I bought a 84 4Runner to build (it was rough) and then decided I would be better starting with the IFS truck and doing a solid axle swap. I even have the solid axle but I have not seen the need for what I am doing with the truck. I managed to fit 33x12.5's on it with NO lift. The key is stock offset rims in a 15x7 size. Just had a little hammer work to do it. See link in sig. a 33x10.5 would be perfect or a 285x75x15 would be a good combo

The holy grail is the 85 with Fuel injection and they are rare in a truck. All the 4Runners had FI from 85 up.

85 is also a engine year change. That's the first year of the "Laser" block. The 84Fi motor is a oddball one year deal in the trucks. Celicas had it for a couple more years but the 85 up is a better set up.
 
If I had gotten the SR5 package in my 85, it would have had EFI. As it was I had the box stock Hilux with the carb'd engine.

And no, I don't still have it. I rolled it in '86 and it was totalled. :(
 
85 was the last year for solid front axles, but you have to be careful because 85.5 was when they started IFS. Friend of mine has an 85.5 that he bought sight unseen thinking it had a solid front and he was sorely disappointed to learn he was a few months too late on the model year.
 
as others have said 85 was the last year for the solid axle. my 85 is great, i def. use the benefits of the SFA. but i will say it is a ROUGH ride. i'm currently thinking about doing a coil over conversion or something so that i don't kill my back. if you do just light 4wd'ing or use it for a DD IFS would be way better. they're pretty tough in stock or slightly bigger than stock configuration. the hardcore rock crawlers have given it a bad name, but what rig wont' fail when attempting a 4ft boulder? an added benefit of getting a newer model is nicer creature comforts. just my .02
 

Forum statistics

Threads
191,024
Messages
2,931,784
Members
234,925
Latest member
Bobbyjr
Top