Opinion on used Toyota Tundra

MTVR

Well-known member
We considered both the Tundra and the MTVR, but we found that the Tundra just could not measure up.

The MTVR is a much more sophisticated vehicle, having fully-independent suspension (vs. the Tundra's solid rear axle), being coil-sprung (vs. leaf springs in the rear of the Tundra), having full-time all-wheel-drive with a torque-differentiating transfer case, a 7-speed double-overdrive automatic transmission, and CTIS that can air the front and rear tires up and down independently.

The MTVR also has many features that the Tundra does not- 16" of front suspension travel, 13" of rear suspension travel, 16" of ground clearance, 60" water-fording capability, a 58:1 crawl ratio without having to shift a two-speed transfer case into "low range", five selectable driveline locks, 53" tall beadlocked Michelin tubeless radials with runflat inserts, 1,550 pounds of torque from it's 11.9-liter (730 cubic inch) Caterpillar turbodiesel engine, 30,000 pound payload capacity, and 62,200 pound GVWR.

The Tundra would be easier to park outside Bath & Body Works at the mall, but in the end, that wasn't enough to sway us.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 9101

Guest
Many people say they would not buy a modded or lifted truck. Would you ever buy a truck sold on the classified section of the forum? Or only with a personal friend that you know has done the modifications correctly/ the way you'd want them?

Don't really care who did it, I don't want to buy someone elses gremlins...lol.
 

tacollie

Glamper
We considered both the Tundra and the MTVR, but we found that the Tundra just could not measure up.

The MTVR is a much more sophisticated vehicle, having fully-independent suspension (vs. the Tundra's solid rear axle), being coil-sprung (vs. leaf springs in the rear of the Tundra), having full-time all-wheel-drive with a torque-differentiating transfer case, a 7-speed double-overdrive automatic transmission, and CTIS that can air the front and rear tires up and down independently.

The MTVR also has many features that the Tundra does not- 16" of front suspension travel, 13" of rear suspension travel, 16" of ground clearance, 60" water-fording capability, a 58:1 crawl ratio without having to shift a two-speed transfer case into "low range", five selectable driveline locks, 53" tall beadlocked Michelin tubeless radials with runflat inserts, 1,550 pounds of torque from it's 11.9-liter (730 cubic inch) Caterpillar turbodiesel engine, 30,000 pound payload capacity, and 62,200 pound GVWR.

The Tundra would be easier to park outside Bath & Body Works at the mall, but in the end, that wasn't enough to sway us.

That's a stupid comparison. They are completely different vehicles. MTVRs are really neat but aren't practical for 99% of people. OP is asking about practical vehicles not propose built military vehicles. A Humvee would be more appropriate comparison but still not as practical.

We like to travel light and under the radar. Those are boxes a MTVR doesn't check.
 

bkg

Explorer
Many people say they would not buy a modded or lifted truck. Would you ever buy a truck sold on the classified section of the forum? Or only with a personal friend that you know has done the modifications correctly/ the way you'd want them?

100% agree with you on this. I've purchased two vehicles from ExPo members and both have been great - and saved me a ton of money or a similar build. Additionally, I've purchased 4 built crawlers in my life, again with great results. All, however, I had great background information on the vehicle and seller.

Buying built can be a huge cost savings... but it requires a lot of honest research.
 

Todd780

OverCamper

1000arms

Well-known member
I bought it in an online auction. It originally cost $250,000, but I got it for $15,500. One owner. It is an MTVR.

We considered both the Tundra and the MTVR, but we found that the Tundra just could not measure up.

The MTVR is a much more sophisticated vehicle, having fully-independent suspension (vs. the Tundra's solid rear axle), being coil-sprung (vs. leaf springs in the rear of the Tundra), having full-time all-wheel-drive with a torque-differentiating transfer case, a 7-speed double-overdrive automatic transmission, and CTIS that can air the front and rear tires up and down independently.

The MTVR also has many features that the Tundra does not- 16" of front suspension travel, 13" of rear suspension travel, 16" of ground clearance, 60" water-fording capability, a 58:1 crawl ratio without having to shift a two-speed transfer case into "low range", five selectable driveline locks, 53" tall beadlocked Michelin tubeless radials with runflat inserts, 1,550 pounds of torque from it's 11.9-liter (730 cubic inch) Caterpillar turbodiesel engine, 30,000 pound payload capacity, and 62,200 pound GVWR.

The Tundra would be easier to park outside Bath & Body Works at the mall, but in the end, that wasn't enough to sway us.
That's a stupid comparison. They are completely different vehicles. MTVRs are really neat but aren't practical for 99% of people. OP is asking about practical vehicles not propose built military vehicles. A Humvee would be more appropriate comparison but still not as practical.

We like to travel light and under the radar. Those are boxes a MTVR doesn't check.
No, it is not a "stupid" comparison. Slo_dak, the OP (the one who posted this thread asking about a Tundra), asked MTVR what kind of truck he bought, and if he bought it from a dealer. MTVR responded, and was kind enough to add a comparison of the vehicles he and his wife were looking at. The $15,500 MTVR might not be what you want, but that doesn't change the what comparisons MTVR and his wife made while considering what to purchase for an expedition rig. :cool:
 

rruff

Explorer
We considered both the Tundra and the MTVR, but we found that the Tundra just could not measure up.

Believe it or not I considered an MTVR as well, since this will be our full time abode. But we are living light and I figured a big military truck would be more costly and more hassle in the long run.
 

tacollie

Glamper
No, it is not a "stupid" comparison. Slo_dak, the OP (the one who posted this thread asking about a Tundra), asked MTVR what kind of truck he bought, and if he bought it from a dealer. MTVR responded, and was kind enough to add a comparison of the vehicles he and his wife were looking at. The $15,500 MTVR might not be what you want, but that doesn't change the what comparisons MTVR and his wife made while considering what to purchase for an expedition rig. :cool:
Maybe silly is a better word? It's funny to compare the two. They have very little in common. One is a light duty truck and the other could probably drive over a light duty truck ?
 

MTVR

Well-known member
We tried, but we were just not able to figure out how to fit a garage with two motorcycles and two bicycles, a bedroom with a queen-sized bed, a full kitchen, a dining room, a living room with sofa, a full bathroom with shower and jetted tub, a custom made gun safe, a fold-out 8-foot by 8 foot rear deck, and everything else that we wanted, into a Tundra.
 

Todd780

OverCamper
We tried, but we were just not able to figure out how to fit a garage with two motorcycles and two bicycles, a bedroom with a queen-sized bed, a full kitchen, a dining room, a living room with sofa, a full bathroom with shower and jetted tub, a custom made gun safe, a fold-out 8-foot by 8 foot rear deck, and everything else that we wanted, into a Tundra.
That sounds like a challenge! lol

maxresdefault.jpg
 

1000arms

Well-known member
No, it is not a "stupid" comparison. Slo_dak, the OP (the one who posted this thread asking about a Tundra), asked MTVR what kind of truck he bought, and if he bought it from a dealer. MTVR responded, and was kind enough to add a comparison of the vehicles he and his wife were looking at. The $15,500 MTVR might not be what you want, but that doesn't change the what comparisons MTVR and his wife made while considering what to purchase for an expedition rig. :cool:
Maybe silly is a better word? It's funny to compare the two. They have very little in common. One is a light duty truck and the other could probably drive over a light duty truck ?
How about "unusual" comparison? It is polite and probably makes your point. :)

You might chuckle at my post in MTVR's thread: https://expeditionportal.com/forum/threads/building-our-box-out-of-wood.214899/post-2781213

From that post, "Your vehicle has a payload more than double the 14,000 pound GVWR of a Ford F-350 DRW pickup. You could load 2 F-350 DRWs to the 14000 GVWR, crush them, load them in to your truck, and have enough payload left for two people and 4 dogs (assuming a max weight of 500-pounds/person and 250-pounds/per dog). o_O

Your vehicle has a payload more than 4x the payload of a Ford F-350 4x4, gas-powered, regular cab, dually pickup."


Believe it or not I considered an MTVR as well, since this will be our full time abode. But we are living light and I figured a big military truck would be more costly and more hassle in the long run.
We tried, but we were just not able to figure out how to fit a garage with two motorcycles and two bicycles, a bedroom with a queen-sized bed, a full kitchen, a dining room, a living room with sofa, a full bathroom with shower and jetted tub, a custom made gun safe, a fold-out 8-foot by 8 foot rear deck, and everything else that we wanted, into a Tundra.
A number of years ago I debated between a Jeep Wrangler and a full-size regular-cab longbed pickup truck. I went with the Jeep then. More recently I went through the comparison again. This time I went with the pickup truck. Although not the extreme difference between the Tundra and MTVR, the Jeep Wrangler and the fullsize regular-cab longbed pickup truck are quite different critters. :cool:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,290
Messages
2,904,965
Members
229,961
Latest member
bdpkauai
Top