As always, thanks for any input.
Josh,
These are all well done images (post #343)
1) The lighting in this image is nice and soft. It helps the plans look soft and inviting.
The colors stand out well.
The fence is a distraction from the scene.
If the fence is a key element, move in on it and make it larger. Have it move through the photograph from near to far, at an angle, like the 3rd image below.
It looks like you used a split-density filter, to even oout hte brightness in the sky. If so, you did well. The only place you can see it is in the tree, and the color of the filter does not look to be "neutral". It looks a little golden.
The tree is also well positioned in the image. It becomes a subject, but lets your eye move around to the right side of it.
2) The lighting here is also very nice.
It is a little difficult to tell what the subject is (rig or sunset). THe sunset is brightest, but the rig is closest and positioned better.
The only distraction is the power lines.
I like the way the grassy edge of the road leads your eye back to the rig.
The headlights draw your attention to the rig, but it subconsiously makes you want to squint, like looking at a picture of someone arc-welding. It is a weird response, since the computer screen is not as bright as either light source.
3) I really like the wooden fence.
Nice depth-of-field (focus near and far).
Good exposure.
The composition, with the fence leading you through the image works very well.
The only issue I see, is the fence cutting through the skyline of the mountains. Many people find it more pleasing to have the mountain tops be just above the subject. Bring the camera up, just a few inches and the top of the fence posts woud be below the skyline. Some instructors call these problems "intersections" or "intersecting lines". Your eye can't follow the flow of either subject.