gjackson said:
I have found some of the best places I have ever overlanded are in places for which maps are hard to get, and good maps are impossible to get. In places in the Sahara there are no features on maps, or exaggerated features you cannot rely on.
I use my GPS. I like it a lot. I have probably risked my life on it. I will again.
GPS
is a very reliable system. It is robust, being a military resource. The receivers on the consumer market work fine, although IMO (quite unknowledgable) the ruggedness appears to vary to some extent. But I don't have a problem with GPS in concept nor in use. I primarily chose not to use it for cost and personal reasons. I spend all day in front of computers designing pieces for satellites, I could care less about them away from work. I specifically don't carry a laptop, digital camera, XM radio, GPS, etc. for that reason, to get away from the gizmos, beeping, whirling, blinking toys. I certainly don't expect anyone else would make that decision (in fact, please DO buy those things, it keeps me employed!).
The bottom line is I get personal satisfaction by navigating by map and compass. It makes me slow down, unwind and think; it relaxes me, that's the really the reason I'm stuck in the past.
I've only had the opportunity to travel in North America, with one tourist trip to Germany. Very good maps have been easy to get for me, thanks to the USGS, National Geographic and the DeLorme. Should I drive to a place that has little or no coverage on good maps, GPS would be very important. In the end, that is exactly why it was developed, to know location precisely in a place that you don't have good materials. It works very, very well for that purpose.