Am I seeing this right....it was tested it with the rectangular tube verticial but it's being built with the tube horizontal?
Did this answer question or did i mis understand it?
Tube here looks to be vertical.
View attachment 669537
Tube here looks to be horizontal. Orienting vertically has more resiance to torsion.
View attachment 674597
Ahhh now i follow you the tube in moc set up was 75mm heigh x 50 wide
The tube i have used is 75 heigh x 125 wide.
The reason behind this is purly a max height V torsional stiffness v flex/sag resistance . See below for a comparison .
View attachment 676777
I could have tryed to save weight with the 100x50 x 6 tube but decided the height and bigger allowance left on stress with equal deflection was the way to go. She was made to carry alot more load than i will ever be putting on her.
&
Due to my chassis already being massivly heigh i could not really go for anything heigher than the 75 mm and keep under my goal height of 3.7mtr all in with an acceptavle amount of head room in the hab. As with everything in these builds it is all a compramise / give n take / pleasure n pain
Hmmm....is the "mid-piont mm" with both tubes oriented with the 75mm wall being vertical or does it compare the 125mm vertical to 75mm vertical?
Hey. They are both with the tube at 75mm heigh if i flipped it to 125 h it would be significantly less deflection mid point mm. In the chart it states 1st measurment is H 2nd is W and 3rd is T.
Wouldn't a 48v system allow you to use a 48v 2nd alternator and charge the battery's faster than a 24v or 12v system?