teotwaki said:
It would be nice if there were aftermarket kits for manual locking hubs for newer Tacomas and 4Runners. That could eliminate a little more drivetrain drag. Also eliminate all of the excess weight and aerodynamic drag as much as possible. We add in sliders, bumpers, second batteries and fridges and its no wonder that our mileage goes down. Emulating the ultralight backpackers might be a good compromise.
A question for Desert Rose: 20MPG sounds average to good for the Taco so will you have to give up payload and space in order to achieve 30 MPG in another vehicle?
Good question. I have a lot of unused payload and space in the Taco - I'd rather have the option of 4 seats for friends and family.
I like where you're going with your query: I'll paraphrase it to
can we do more with less?
I really had thought I could find something in the cross-over SUV or CUTE-UTE (love that!) but none of those is really "less" in the grand scheme of wanting to be more ecological (less cost to environment) and economical (less cost to me). I would not gain much economy, and I'd give up a great vehicle (Tacoma) that does a heck of a lot more on the trail.
See the PDF of the spreadsheet I did - first post. Not a lot of difference. That's why I ended up steering away from the Subarus, because they didn't seem to have the mileage that I was aiming for (closer to 30) - though some people seem to differ with what I'm reading on Consumer Reports. I think driving styles have a lot to do with it!
But maybe I should revisit my original goals and background, to keep on track.
Why I'm considering doing this:
- I thought it would be interesting to try to find a real 'ecological' and 'economical' vehicle that is comfortable on the highway, easy enough to drive in the city, and could be used for overlanding (we already own a superb FJ40 and a project Land Rover 88 - so do I really need a third super-trail-worthy vehicle?).
- I do this every once in a while (swap vehicles) - I love vehicles, especially 4x4s, and though I adore my Tacoma, it has its faults: poor gas economy for its size, seats only 2, and the cargo area is inconvenient (I loved the convenience of my 4-door FJ55, for example).
So in the spirit of some recent discussions in the Conservation section about environmentally conscious overlanding, I wanted to see if it was possible to find a truck that fit my criteria.
Below is a list of criteria, and my true secret goal revealed. :roost:
ECO-OVERLANDER PROJECT
“
Economical & Ecological Overlanding Vehicle”
Primary Goal:
- Replace 2000 4WD Tacoma TRD (V6, Xcab,188K miles, OME, rear-locker, ARE topper, ARB)
- Est. sale price $11,000
Secret Goal:
- Have enough $ left over to buy a 250cc dual-sport moto :luxhello:
Criteria for new vehicle:
- Must be high-fuel-economy (i.e. - over 30 mpg average if possible; I don't consider 20 mpg to be remotely economical under my definition)
- Diesel or able to convert to diesel a major plus
- Seating for four
- Prefer 4WD or AWD; low-range very desirable but necessary? not sure
- Comfortable on highway
- Airbags
- NHTSA rating 4-5 a big plus
I'll add, for clarity:
- Able to do light overlanding (no rock-crawling) and exploration on dirt roads and some backcountry. Remember, we've got an FJ40.
- Would be nice to have a "highway" comfortable vehicle, and one that's a little easier to drive in town than the LC (though I do get shapely biceps from driving it).
I frankly am surprised I can't find something like the Outback that gets good mileage. [And I'm going to keep saying, I don't think 20-23 mpg is "good" mileage - remember the 70s energy crisis? Hondas came in that were getting 40mpg - now that's good!]
I keep leaning more and more toward diesel . . .