Review of ARB Bushranger X-Jack

Gear

Explorer, Overland Certified OC0020
Lance will probable chime in but we were talking about the CO2 option and he pointed out that he blew thru a 15# tank in 5 X-jack fill ups. He was using the compressor to help out at the end of the fill up on my Jeep. The X-jack has a lot of volume to fill so CO2 is an option but not the first choice.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
I too am interested in the air-valve filling option, but I'm also curious if/how much faster it is to use exhaust?

VitSports6 said:
With a large V8 I would imagine it would fill up quickly, As you could see from my youtube video, we filled it with a 4cyl 4Runner.
OBA is certainly a nice option, But with the size of the valve I would think it would take at least as long as a 35" tire fill, But that is why you are going to test , right? :victory:
 

Ron B

Explorer
VitSports6 said:
With a large V8 I would imagine it would fill up quickly, As you could see from my youtube video, we filled it with a 4cyl 4Runner.
OBA is certainly a nice option, But with the size of the valve I would think it would take at least as long as a 35" tire fill, But that is why you are going to test , right? :victory:


I've heard that some are having issues with exhaust pipes that turn down near the tip. That's why my main option will be with ob air. Also I'm curious how high it will get my truck, and it will lift the truck from under the diff (being the pig that it is).

rb
 

VitSports6

New member
Ron B said:
I've heard that some are having issues with exhaust pipes that turn down near the tip. That's why my main option will be with ob air. Also I'm curious how high it will get my truck, and it will lift the truck from under the diff (being the pig that it is).

rb

Yes, I cut my exhaust tip straight for this fact.
Good luck, Im interested to see what you find.
 

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
I've used compressed air to fill the jacks, works fine... depending on your air source. With my shop compressor it fills up quick :D But with a smaller OBA compressor, it might be awhile.

For example, using the ARB CKMA12 (the new ARB full-size compressor)... it would take 2-3 minutes to fully inflate, while the exhaust does it in well under a minute, under half a minute at that.
 
Im so glad I saw this, I have seen one of these devices before but never thought twice about it, till now! My buddy got stuck in a rocky river bed , with about 6 inches of flowing water, and a high lift jack just wasnt happening. This would have saved used hours, and maybe even some abuse on my tranny and tires!

Im sold on the product just not the ARB product since its twice the price of the TITAN jack. Is it because its half the quality? someone please post a Titan review, Im anxiouse!
 
Last edited:

Life_in_4Lo

Explorer
Great thread, thanks for the link to the Titan jack.
I just ordered the 4ton model $119+11 shipping and should be her in a few days.
The owner was prompt in response and great on the phone
Steve Chandler
Chandler Products
901-238-4453

I'll update when I get it! I plan to take this instead of the hi-lift to DV for a week.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Wow, that is inexpensive! Is the quality and warranty the same?


Life_in_4Lo said:
Great thread, thanks for the link to the Titan jack.
I just ordered the 4ton model $119+11 shipping and should be her in a few days.
The owner was prompt in response and great on the phone
Steve Chandler
Chandler Products
901-238-4453

I'll update when I get it! I plan to take this instead of the hi-lift to DV for a week.
 

HenryJ

Expedition Leader
How many are using this type of jack? Do you see it as a viable alternative to a Hi-lift?
I do understand the other uses for the Hi-lift in winching , as an anchor point , a hitch repair, tent pole, hammer, etc.
This seems to have an advantage on soft surfaces like sand and perhaps mud. The weight reduction and ease of storage is attractive.
I am really thinking about leaving the Hi-lift at home and carrying one of these. I already pack a winch for pulling. Seems like between the two and a few mats you would have some pretty good options for recovery.
 

VitSports6

New member
HenryJ said:
How many are using this type of jack? Do you see it as a viable alternative to a Hi-lift?
I do understand the other uses for the Hi-lift in winching , as an anchor point , a hitch repair, tent pole, hammer, etc.
This seems to have an advantage on soft surfaces like sand and perhaps mud. The weight reduction and ease of storage is attractive.
I am really thinking about leaving the Hi-lift at home and carrying one of these. I already pack a winch for pulling. Seems like between the two and a few mats you would have some pretty good options for recovery.

I think its a great tool to have, Most people I wheel with carry a High lift, I dont take mine any longer, But I do carry my X-jack.
You mention the multi use high lift, I have a winch, BFH, Dont really need a tent pole.

I guess it is a nice addition.

Uncle Ben said:
If comparing Jack vrs. Jack a High Lift is infinitely more dangerous to use! Great concept that has been around for a long time! The X-Jack is very well thought out and storage is pretty practical! Cost difference is not a make or break because of what you get for your money! Practicality is where the two items differ as the X-Jack is just a jack/vehicle support while the High Lift is a versatile multi-tool that works OK for a lot of things but isn't perfect for any one thing!
 

Dave Bennett

Adventurist
HenryJ said:
I am really thinking about leaving the Hi-lift at home and carrying one of these. I already pack a winch for pulling. Seems like between the two and a few mats you would have some pretty good options for recovery.

X2

I'm looking to lose some weight on the truck, and the Hi-Lift is at the top of my PITA list already so the X-Jack sounds very good right now.

The Titan sounds good but I'll wait for some real world reports first :coffee:
 

FlyingWen

Explorer
The X Jack is perfect in all applications, especially sand. Weighing in at about 30lbs, it is much lighter then the Hi-Lift... and less dangerous!
 

cruiseroutfit

Well-known member
FlyingWen said:
The X Jack is perfect in all applications, especially sand. Weighing in at about 30lbs, it is much lighter then the Hi-Lift... and less dangerous!

Two X-Jacks weigh 30lbs ;) (well 30.8lbs)

Definitely worth the weight savings, I'm still waiting for someone to use one for bodywork though! :cool:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,115
Messages
2,913,130
Members
231,762
Latest member
RC_X_Overland
Top