Rubicon...Is it worth it?

Is Rubicon pagage worth it?

  • Yes

    Votes: 34 73.9%
  • No

    Votes: 5 10.9%
  • Depends/Don't Know

    Votes: 7 15.2%

  • Total voters
    46

goodtimes

Expedition Poseur
No argueing here Scott...I just honestly feel that an experienced driver has more control and finesse with a manual transmission and appropriate gearing than with an automatic. I also feel that rock buggies are generally not a prime example of control or finesse. Maybe the drivers are getting better with the un-needed use of power than they used to....I have not paid much attention to the competitions lately. On the trail, the guys running the manuals and deep gears make it look much easier than the automatics.

From personal experience with both automatics and manuals, I feel much more "connected" to a vehicle with a manual transmission. I [usually] know how to manipulate the transmission to get what I want...this is not really an option with a automatic. You get the gear that the PCM decides you need (yes, you can force it into a lower gear, but not a higher gear--unless you run a manual valve body, which is no fun on the street)

For example, last years ExTrophy event. When I was sitting at the bottom of the hill (start line) when I pre-ran the rally course. I was in 4-lo. If I was in an automatic, I would have stood on the gas, the jeep would have made it 1/2 way up the hill before it stopped accelerating, hesitating for a second as it grabbed 2nd gear. It would have carried 2nd gear through the immediate left (top of the hill) and probably tried to grab 3rd as I eased off the gas and made the right to head between the trees. Then when I got after it again, it would have downshifted, quite possibly back to 1st gear due to the low speed at which I made that off camber right hand turn, but it would have gone to second as soon as it found first due to the engine speed....

But, with the manual, I pushed it into 3rd gear, let loose of the clutch as I stood on the gas....and kept it in 3rd gear all the way until I made the right turn back into the wash (after turn 4). I was able to keep the engine RPM where I wanted, with a direct connection between the engine and transmission...no hunting for gears, no wondering what the heck the PCM was going to decide to do....it was where I wanted it and I knew what it was going to do.

Another example....front tires are on top of a large verticle step, rear tires are at the bottom. You don't have enough traction to crawl the ledge, so you need to bump it. With deep gears and an automatic, you start off in first gear, and may or may not build enough speed to give yourself the traction you need...you might very well need 2nd gear to give yourself the wheel speed in such a short distance. Going through 1st gear, waiting for the 1-2 upshift and then building wheel speed probably isn't an option....with a manual, pick the gear you need, put it there and go.

Then of course is the textbook Pyeatte move...come into a corner to hot in way to high of a gear (5th), downshift (to 3rd) with the expectation of accelerating out of the corner, but waiting to long to get back after the gas and end up sliding sideways down the road, hoping you don't hit the ditch or go wheels up....and hoping that guy that is right on your heels sees you and stops before his ARB bumper gets up close and personal with your door....OK, so maybe that isn't such a good example :hehe:

Now don't get me wrong...automatics are much easier to drive, they are more forgiving with the shock loads, they do offer a notable effective gear reduction, they are easier to feather the brakes with (control front wheel hop), and if you don't have deep enough gearing, they are much better....but, like I said, with the proper gearing, I think the manual is better on techincal terrain.

Oh, there is one more very good example of manuals being just too cool....The first time I got high centered in my jeep, 2 guys driving some big stupid ford super dutys told me I couldn't make it through the rock garden where they had stopped (FWIW, this was on Dishpan Springs, before they built the bridge). I got almost all the way through, literally getting stuck on the last damn rock. With the jeep idling in 4-lo/1st gear with both lockers on...I got out of the jeep, lifted up on the rear bumper and pushed forward, the jeep pulled itself off the rock, I looked back at the nay-sayers, walked back to the jeep (now idling down the trail), got back in and went on my way. You will simply never see the look on those guys faces when trying to get an automatic off that rock.
 
Last edited:

Scott Brady

Founder
goodtimes said:
Then of course is the textbook Pyeatte move...come into a corner to hot in way to high of a gear (5th), downshift (to 3rd) with the expectation of accelerating out of the corner, but waiting to long to get back after the gas and end up sliding sideways down the road, hoping you don't hit the ditch or go wheels up....and hoping that guy that is right on your heels sees you and stops before his ARB bumper gets up close and personal with your door....OK, so maybe that isn't such a good example :hehe:

That WAS cool :)

On the above example (ExPo rally course), I would want a manual too. On the fast stuff, let me row the gears...
 

Wanderlusty

Explorer
goodtimes said:
Oh, there is one more very good example of manuals being just too cool....The first time I got high centered in my jeep, 2 guys driving some big stupid ford super dutys told me I couldn't make it through the rock garden where they had stopped (FWIW, this was on Dishpan Springs, before they built the bridge). I got almost all the way through, literally getting stuck on the last damn rock. With the jeep idling in 4-lo/1st gear with both lockers on...I got out of the jeep, lifted up on the rear bumper and pushed forward, the jeep pulled itself off the rock, I looked back at the nay-sayers, walked back to the jeep (now idling down the trail), got back in and went on my way. You will simply never see the look on those guys faces when trying to get an automatic off that rock.

Now that seems like a sweet move there. I can only imagine the looks on their faces!
:Wow1:
 

Wanderlusty

Explorer
4Rescue said:
As far as I know the New JK Rubicons use AAM axles same maker as they used on the Powerwagon and the HD Rams... Those are ALOT nicer axles than 44's, either way if were talking about the new JK's, I'd say buy an older(pre 07) base unlimited (cause the new JK unlimited is ****in AWFUL imo) and build it to suit, it has the 4.0L not the 3.8 and you can put D44's or D60's under it if thet's what you're wanting... There are suposed to be ALOT of mechanical improvements made to the Rubi's for 07, but they unfortunately come in the new ****ty body style with the junk motor and no 2dr LWB option. As far as I'm concerned, the 2dr unlimited was the best Jeep ever made... that's my .02

The new JK Rubi's still roll Dana 44's, albeit improved ones. From what I hear, they have more in common with a Dana 60 than the 44's that the TJ had.

As far as the TJ vs JK....I am a big fan of the TJ....I own one, and may try to keep it if finances allow (probably not... :( ) and am a HUGE fan of the 4.0. That engine is AWESOME.

But even a 2 door ULTD does not solve the problem of slinging a carseat into the back seat. It is really quite a feat of gymnastics...and it is getting old...

I don't really care for the techno-gadgetry that made it's way into the JK, but other than that, to me anyway, it still looks like a Jeep. And I think the 3.8, while it may not be the 4.0, will be fine...I think 'JUNK' is inaccurate. These same engines in the minivans have been known to go several hundred thousand miles. AND that isn't even including if the DIESEL comes.

I hate to see the TJ's go...but I think the JK's are fine...
 

86cj

Explorer
FAT-MAN,

I use my jeep much like you do and have faced the issues on your mind. I could have waited and got the Rubicon LWB instead of my Sport LWB, but a 4:1 T case would not work for me.
In 4 hi the 4.0 does not have enough power to pull the Jeep around loaded in anything soft or steep off road and heats up the convertor.(or smokes the clutch). A 4:1 can't generate the wheel speed needed for my type of wheeling, also a SYE would be nice but is not needed at my lift height (3").

I am going to have to regear axles Rubi or not, and with so many people crying about the "Poser" front 44, I choose to go with the Sport and sort out all the axle upgrades avaliable later. With the AEV Highline fender debute (35 or 37" tires small lift) the Rubi front 44 would not be the best choice anyway.

An auto works good for me as I never had any luck downshifting a manual on a hill climb without loosing to much momentum. A Jeep 6cyl can't rev enough to stay in first all the way up most hills and does not have enough power to pull anything higher at the top. I have had both in all conditions and prefer an auto.
From my experience an auto most likley will last the life of vehicle with no repairs just filter changes. A manual trans Will need a clutch someday and if a repair is needed to the manual box (CHING!! internals are ridiculous) you will wish for a commonly available rebuilt auto. "Of course if you reguarly rebuild your rig from junkyard parts disregard the rebuilt manual horror story"
 

calamaridog

Expedition Leader
expeditionswest said:
But, manuals are way more fun :roost:

I'd trade my automatic for a manual in a second (can you throw in roll-up windows and cloth seats?). Too bad they only offered the V8 with the 5spd manual overseas, otherwise I'd have one.

Manuals ARE way more fun. Most people lack the SKILL to properly use them. Heaven forbid that SKILL should be needed to drive in these competitions:D

And don't forget, what goes up must come down. Compression braking is a wonderful thing. The only saving grace going downhill with the 100 series is the awesome brakes.

I'd definitely buy the Rubicon, what a great package. I'd say that it's almost expedition ready. Just add storage and go!
 
it will be 2 years atleast for a Diesel JK engine

the 6spd manual is so smooth, but if you live in a city where MOST of your driving is done - regardless an auto is worth it even if its your exped. vehicle.

Anyone who is using a JK for daily/weekly use and fairly frequent trail use will prefer an auto if you live in an area with a population over 100,000
 
S

Scenic WonderRunner

Guest
THANK YOU .....Calamaridog!....aka...Bryan.

Now I get it!

I do like the Jeep.....

.....and just think how much Kewler this whole Jeep thing will be with a future Diesel Engine!


....and YES.....I think it's worth it!

..........:bigbossHL:
 

Wanderlusty

Explorer
Z O O R O P A said:
it will be 2 years atleast for a Diesel JK engine

the 6spd manual is so smooth, but if you live in a city where MOST of your driving is done - regardless an auto is worth it even if its your exped. vehicle.

Anyone who is using a JK for daily/weekly use and fairly frequent trail use will prefer an auto if you live in an area with a population over 100,000

City around 50,000 and even then, my standard does get old around town. But I cope...

But with talking to my wife, I think she is getting more and more interested in riding along and occasionally :smiley_drive: but still not enthusiastic about driving standard, so starting to lean towards the auto anyway. It is (current Jeep) and will be (Future Jeep?) my DD so I do need to think about what concessions I want to make to that end.
 

computeruser

Explorer
Z O O R O P A said:
it will be 2 years atleast for a Diesel JK engine

the 6spd manual is so smooth, but if you live in a city where MOST of your driving is done - regardless an auto is worth it even if its your exped. vehicle.

Anyone who is using a JK for daily/weekly use and fairly frequent trail use will prefer an auto if you live in an area with a population over 100,000

Really? Seems like a bit of a leap from personal opinion to universal conclusion.

I spent years with a YJ with a stick, now have a TJ with a slushbox. And I spend most of my time in urban and dense-suburban areas with lots of traffic, AND I tow at the vehicle's rated towing capacity on a regular basis. Seriously thinking about swapping the TJ's slushbox out for a stick, despite the cost/aggrivation/downtime...
 
yeah I grew up on stick myself but it gets old in stop n go traffic. Besides, there are "somethings" much easier to do in a car with an auto that just make it all the more worth while :exclaim:
 

RunninRubicon

Adventurer
auto vs stick

I can remember the days when I first learned to love a stick-shift. Then came kids and a mini-van. Now, I love slingin a stick again. I live in a city of a million people. I don't mind shifting gears. It reminds me why I made the decision to buy my third Wrangler. Shifting reminds me of what I CAN do and the rest just wish for. With the 4.0 I-6 I can lug around town at 800rpm and still have enough punch to catch the light. Never underestimate what a 64:1 ratio can do for you. Ya just gotta love a 4:1 transfer case-gears are your friend. Selectable lockers & a operators manual with explicit instructions-with pictures for the thicker brows, both covered with a long running factory warranty is just golden! "Da! Ya break it - THEY fix it." Life doesn't get much sweeter. It doesn't take long after bending a wrench or two, to realize early on! Parts ain't cheap! Gettin someone ELSE to pay for them-Candy to this baby-thank you extended warranty!
This auto vs stick debate has and will go on for as long as the two trannys are built. I say learn to use what you brought to the table and be happy for the guy who has, because both will get you where you want to go and that's why we drive Jeeps in the first place .....at least that's my 2 cents.:ylsmoke:
 

thejafe

Adventurer
I factory ordered my TJ with all the options that I felt were necessary for my base vehicle. I started with a SPORT, not a Rubicon and it came out to just over $24k.

It would have been nice to have the D44's front and rear + the 4:1 transfer case of the Rubicon but I wanted to keep initial costs down. So far I've been just fine on the trails with a D44 rear only. I don't see myself upgrading my front axle to a D44 anytime soon.

In the future I may add an ARB locker, but that won't be until after I regear from 3.73 to 4.11.

Basically, I chose to build my rig to my own specifications, rather than purchase the Rubicon package. There's no right or wrong way to do it, but there certainly are arguments for both purchasing the Rubicon package and for building from the ground up.
 

SeaRubi

Explorer
I have one of the afore-mentioned 2006 unlimited rubicons, mine with the 6 speed. Thus far it has been a great vehicle. The new 2007 unlimiteds are too large a vehicle for my needs, but the extra equipment can't be beat.

Many people fall into the trap of tallying up the premium and make a financial comparison based on armchair-mechanic estimates and don't fully take into account the length of time and expense required to install all of those aftermarket goodies. Underestimating my own wrenching skills and available time led me to sell my prior vehicle and go with the Jeep Rubicon. Nowadays I find the little bit of free time I do have is spent adventuring and not stressing over what needs to be done to my vehicle next.

fwiw
 

Forum statistics

Threads
190,225
Messages
2,925,298
Members
233,522
Latest member
Petersmithinak
Top