I'm pretty unsure what to do about my "undercover snorkel" that's no longer undercover. The purpose of it being routed this way is to keep the inlet about 2.5' back and 8" higher than stock. My fenders are trimmed, the fender liners are gone, and now the very exposed intake is likely to suck up water and mud should I drive through any. Can't have that. Fender liners are not coming back.
The open end is angled down towards the intake at about a 30 degree angle. Anything gets in there and it's going all the way into the intake.
I've been brainstorming what to do and would appreciate input and ideas.
Possibilities-
1. Route the intake to the cowl, which I'm not sure is possible on our trucks. I read through this idea on TW-
https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads/different-approach-to-a-snorkel.266449/. Pulled up the cowl on my truck and it doesn't have the obvious separate wall like the Taco does. At least not on the passenger side. Has anyone gone through the firewall and seen what is back there? Another guy even went as far as to route it straight into the cab behind the glovebox where it's loud as hell, but completely water tight. Hard to even consider that an option without knowing what's back there, and I don't want my engine to rob my HVAC of air. Here's a photo of the concept from TW.
2. This is a very interesting idea.-
I came across this airbox mod and am intrigued if combing this with the above would be a great option...
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/forums/intake-and-exhaust/315545-airbox-mod-cold-ram-air/
I would cover the ends of the intake with Frogskin, just for extra precaution. Don't know if you guys have ever seen aftermarket snowmobile intakes, but this stuff is a unique mesh that will allow air to pass through but not water. On a deep day I'll often reach down and brush away a huge stack of snow piled up on the intake because the sled isn't getting enough air. The sled is hot, the bottom of that stack is snow is always melted, and water stays out. Still, I wouldn't entire rely on just this to keep water out of the intake.
Frogskin looks like this-
3. This guy routed his PVC similar to mine, but then it goes back into his cowling. This photo made me think about making my current routing turn 90 degrees back into the engine bay, and have the intake there, near my small ARB compressor. I'm unsure how airflow would be at the back of the engine bay, but could it be any worse than when the current intake was covered up by the inner fender liner? The back of the engine bay would be a safe spot at least, being 3' further back and at least 6" higher than where the stock intake was, and then covered by frogskin to stay clean.
4. Mount a pre-cleaner somewhere? Just outside the fender and goofy looking? Meh. :ugh: This guy's 4runner fender snorkel isn't too terrible, but I don't really like this idea either. It'll get ripped off on the trail.-
DeGoose Adventures: Building a home made snorkel. Cheesy or custom?
5. Snorkel. Functional yes, but I honestly don't like how they look so I'd rather find another option. I'd have to adapt one to work on the Tundra, which isn't an issue. There are plenty of cheap ebay knockoffs to experiment with if it comes to that point. I'm considering this the last resort.
Input, suggestions, experience?