I enjoyed the article as well.
It's interesting that you made the switch to AT's suspension. Knowing what you now know about the SoCal vs AT suspension, if you were to make your purchase again, would you still go with the SoCal trailer or go with the AT product? (Coming from a Chaser, when we decided to move to the teardrop our biggest concern was losing the AT suspension setup. IMHO, the AT Teardrop is the best of both worlds. We got the excellent, proven, SoCal cabin design and craftsmanship with AT's frame and suspension. That's a winning combination in my book.)
In regards to teardrop water crossings, for me, this was the major tradeoff when we moved to the teardrop from the Chaser. Due to the Chaser's metal construction, there was never a worry about the depth of water crossings. I was confident that if the vehicle could make it, the trailer would gladly follow with no long term ill affects of getting wet. Not so with the teardrop. With the teardrop in tow, water crossings are always walked. If the water is deeper than my knees, my teardrop isn't going through. Due to the wood construction, I'm not confident that submersion of the trailer's floor/walls will not cause severe warpage and possible delamination in the long term. To each his own, but my trailer always takes the "high road" on this one. <g>
Again, good article.