.
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST
****************************************
[video=youtube;kAHRz-TkRL0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAHRz-TkRL0 [/video]
There is no question that some really great reef-breaks in the open ocean are not negotiable without tow-in assistance.
But as with many sports, when things get technologically assisted, much of the fun disappears. See the following interesting article that critcizes jet-skis and tow-in surfing, at
http://www.redbull.com/en/surfing/stories/1331678772726/five-reasons-not-to-buy-jet-skis . There is even a movement now to ban tow-in surfing at
"Mavericks", one of the big-wave surfspots in northern California where tow-in surfing was first pioneered.
Personally, my surfing skill set is not sufficient to ride monster waves, and I suspect that very few surfers have the skill-set necessary. Big-wave riding is a niche-obsession in the surfing community. So even if the TerraLiner's ideal customer would find the vehicle attractive as a coastal
“Surf glamper”, they would not necessarily want or need the TerraLiner to carry a Jetski for tow-in surfing.
Furthermore, where tow-in surfing seems desirable and necessary, there will almost always be professionals living and working in the local neighborhood who have their own Jet-Skis, and who would be happy to take one out for a day of fun, for a price. They are professionals, and chances are they will bring out two or three Jetskis to service the same number of clients in a small group. When it comes to big-wave riding and tow-in surfing, there is safety in numbers, because if one Jetski gets caught in the surf, at least there are two more "back up" Jetskis available to rescue it. Tow-in surfing is really
not something one wants to do with just one Jet-ski and two people.
So should the TerraLiner carry around two or three Jetskis? Needless to say, this would be ridiculous. Better to just "rent" Jet-ski assistance when and where it's needed.
****************************************
8. Why a RIB is far more useful than a Jet-Ski
****************************************
So apart from tow-in surfing, I can't really see the value of a Jet-Ski. Jet-Skis are not nearly as much fun to use as small runabout center-console RIBs, and I speak from experience. You can't lounge around and sunbathe on large horizontal surfaces on a Jet-Ski, because they don't have any; it's very unwise to get drunk on a Jet-Ski; you have to wear a bathing suit or wet-suit on a Jet-Ski, because you will almost certainly get wet, even in relatively calm seas; you can't scuba-dive easily from a Jet-Ski (although some do); it's a weird vehicle to use for fishing (although again, some do fish from their Jet-Skis); and a Jet-Ski does not have even a fraction of the storage capacity of a proper boat.
Finally, and I hope I don't get slammed for this, you have to be an acrobat to have sex on a Jetski.....:sombrero:
... Whereas I lost my virginity on a Boston Whaler -- see
http://www.bostonwhaler.com and
http://www.bostonwhaler.com/Page.aspx/pageId/29575/Montauk.aspx.
****************************************
9. The "Panther" Watercar
****************************************
I am definitely still open to other possibilities. For instance, the original
"Python" Watercar seems to be significantly larger than the
Gibbs "Aquada", because it's a 5-seater. Furthermore, the most recent production version of the
Watercar, called the
"Panther", seems to be deliberately designed to look like a small SUV -- see
http://www.gizmag.com/python-watercar-amphibious-performance/13323/ and
http://www.gizmag.com/python-watercar-amphibious-performance/13323/pictures ,
https://www.watercar.com/index.php ,
https://www.watercar.com/about ,
https://www.watercar.com/photos ,
https://www.watercar.com/product ,
https://www.watercar.com/product/fiberglass-hull ,
https://www.watercar.com/product/specifications ,
https://www.watercar.com/faq , and
https://www.watercar.com/videos :
From the point of view of the TerraLiner, this seems a significant improvement over any of the products offered by Gibbs. However, as the fine print states in the Watercar's FAQ:
The Panther can be used in open water but it is a 15 foot boat and limited as to how rough of a sea in which it can be safely operated.
In other words, the
Watercar "Panther" is
not a Zodiac Hurricane, and it's not a true "coastal exploration" vessel. However, as a TOAD to fetch groceries, it's just about nearly perfect, even better than a G-wagen, a Jeep Rubicon, a Landrover Discovery, or a Toyota Landcruiser:
It
looks like a Jeep, it seems like it can handle sand (if the above photographs are to be believed), it probably has some rock-crawling capability, and if a local Third-World bridge has been swept away by a flood, well, no problem.....:sombrero: It merely needs to be fitted with a custom-made, ultra-light (carbon fiber?) hard top, which would also need to be configured so as to function much like an Earthroamer-type "camperette", similar to the XV-JP -- see
http://www.earthroamer.com/tab_xpedition_vehicles/xvjp5_specs.html,
http://earthroamer.com/employees-facilities/previous-designs/xv-jp/,
http://www.earthroamer.com/galleries/xv-jp_first_photos/index.htm ,
http://www.earthroamer.com/galleries/xv-jp_interior/index.htm , and
http://www.earthroamer.com/galleries/xv-jpinaction/index.htm .
Unfortunately, the Watercar "Panther" runs on gasoline, because it has a Honda V-6 V-Tec -- see
https://www.watercar.com/product/engine ,
http://www.autoevolution.com/news/honda-vtec-engines-explained-64368.html , and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTEC . Recall that this was a serious sticking point for the marketability and global usability of the Earthroamer XV-JP. Earthroamer was hoping that Jeep would soon come out with a diesel-fueled version of the Rubicon, but it never did. Jeep may still do so in 2016, but don't hold your breath! So Earthroamer discontinued the XV-JP .
Needless to say, the TerraLiner's TOAD
must be diesel-fueled, which would be no problem if the TOAD were a G-wagen, a Landrover Discovery, or a Toyota Landruiser.....
****************************************
CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
.