Alaska Mike
ExPo Moderator/Eye Candy
Thanks for the detailed answer, TeriAnn. My Series III dash isn't quite as versatile as yours, but I was considering the same location for any module I may need to mount. I'm considering running the wiring harness on that side as well, if for no other reason than to keep it away from the brake and clutch master cylinders.
I certainly like the idea of having more grunt under the hood, but I figure I need to balance that with the existing axles and braking power. The shafts in the rear (thanks to Mercedesrover) will be the least of my worries, but the front shafts will remain stock (with new ujoints) until they break. I'd rather not hurry that process if I can avoid it. The brakes will probably be upgraded first, but that's several years down the line.
One of the reasons I really like the Jeep 2.5L is that they are durable for a MPFI engine. Failures are pretty rare, and the parts can be gotten fairly easily from junkyards (tons of Cherokees out there), parts stores, and the dealer. While not quite as common as the 4.3L, they are out there. Also, it's easier to find a low-mileage 2.5L, simply because people don't put as many miles on a Jeep as they do on a Blazer or S10- at least up here.
Guys up here pull Jeep 2.5Ls all of the time from their Wranglers and Cherokees. You might ask why I would want an engine that everyone seems determined to get rid of. Good question. The main reason people pull them is that they don't have the torque to spin up large (36"+) tires in the mud. Not a problem for me, as I don't plan on running anything larger than a 33" tire. The YJ and the Rover weigh roughly the same (give or take a few hundred pounds- slight advantage Rover) and have the same brick-like aerodynamics.
I'm still in the "what if" stage of looking at this option. I think the main reason it hasn't been done is the whole "Jeep vs Rover" thing, which I don't completely understand given Land Rover's history. I'll do a bit more poking around and see what is possible.
I certainly like the idea of having more grunt under the hood, but I figure I need to balance that with the existing axles and braking power. The shafts in the rear (thanks to Mercedesrover) will be the least of my worries, but the front shafts will remain stock (with new ujoints) until they break. I'd rather not hurry that process if I can avoid it. The brakes will probably be upgraded first, but that's several years down the line.
One of the reasons I really like the Jeep 2.5L is that they are durable for a MPFI engine. Failures are pretty rare, and the parts can be gotten fairly easily from junkyards (tons of Cherokees out there), parts stores, and the dealer. While not quite as common as the 4.3L, they are out there. Also, it's easier to find a low-mileage 2.5L, simply because people don't put as many miles on a Jeep as they do on a Blazer or S10- at least up here.
Guys up here pull Jeep 2.5Ls all of the time from their Wranglers and Cherokees. You might ask why I would want an engine that everyone seems determined to get rid of. Good question. The main reason people pull them is that they don't have the torque to spin up large (36"+) tires in the mud. Not a problem for me, as I don't plan on running anything larger than a 33" tire. The YJ and the Rover weigh roughly the same (give or take a few hundred pounds- slight advantage Rover) and have the same brick-like aerodynamics.
I'm still in the "what if" stage of looking at this option. I think the main reason it hasn't been done is the whole "Jeep vs Rover" thing, which I don't completely understand given Land Rover's history. I'll do a bit more poking around and see what is possible.