FWC V. FlipPac
Ok, I have another out of the blue question for you. And perhaps I missed this discussed earlier in the thread... Did you consider a Flippac at all as an alternative to a FWC shell? Curious to hear what your thoughts are comparing the two as far as plusses and minuses. Immediately I am struck by the potential weight and cost savings of a Flippac setup.
First off I need to say that I think FlipPacs are a great product, they are just not for me. Please keep this in mind when reading the following reasons why I personally do not want a FlipPac.
In random order:
- Resale value. People are selling 5-10 year old used FWC for close to what they paid for them new, and they are selling in hours.
- A FlipPac will have problems with water and dust ingestion. A FWC is a totally sealed camper, no water and no dust to worry about. (I have spent a lot of time working to get my topper sealed and I still have problems with dust and water, mostly because of the composite beds on the Gen2 Tacoma. Depending on the wind direction when driving this can be between a minor annoyance and a major problem requiring lots of time to clean.)
- I feel I can build a better "studio" space in the FWC for working with my camera equipment.
- There is no way to store things on the roof of a FlipPac. I need to at least have the option of carrying two sea kayaks, or a canoe, or a Thule box. I can do this with a FWC.
- A FWC is opened up from the inside, so if it is pouring rain I can stay warm and dry while getting the camper set up. A FlipPac requires being outside and I tend to camp in cold and rainy conditions.
- In the middle of the night a door is easier to open/close from the inside than the tailgate is.
- My personal feeling is that a FWC will handle strong wind while set up better than a FlipPac.
- FWC is easily removable, and the FlipPac is practically permanently mounted. I need to have the truck available as a truck. Plus when not in use I will not be dragging around the extra weight or wind resistance. This is a big deal as my truck is my only vehicle.
- FWC is easier to stealth camp in because it can hang off the back a little, it means that I can sleep my 6'4" body inside my 6' truck bed.
- The swing of a FlipPac means that you can not camp under low hanging branches. And I like to camp under trees.
- FWC is easier to heat, because it is insulated. You can also install a proper permanently mounted heater.
- The fact that the FlipPac needs a separate rainfly is just a joke. Maybe if you live in the southwest and only travel when it rarely rains it would not be as big of a deal. But where and when I travel rain/snow can be a daily occurrence.
- I want to carry the weight of the camper on the frame, not on the bed rails. (Think standing versus sitting on a bike.) I am tiered of having a heavy thing mounted on the bed rails and am looking forward to the weight sitting where it should, on the frame of the truck.
- Weight is closer than you would think. By the time you build in some storage/seating in the truck bed you are about 150lbs different, maybe less. (I worked out exactly what a FlipPac would end up weighing, it was close enough that it did not matter, and you know what a freak about weight I am.)
- Cost is closer than you think between the two. I do not have the numbers in front of me but I think a FlipPac from AT with color match and a windoor is around $5,500. FWC shell is $7,000.
Trust me I have thought long and hard about an AT FlipPac, they are just not for me. (The fact that the weight and cost are not too far off compared to a FWC shell, plus the resale value of the FWC are the main reasons.)
I have though of a situation where the FlipPac really shines, and that is on a quad cab truck with a short 5' bed. On that platform a FlipPac outshines a small camper.