Maybe I'm not making myself clear. The 40, 60, 70 and 80 series cruisers are the "real deal". Models that have come after (100, 200, and anything else in the works) are mall cruisers and ugly to boot.
You've made your opinion abundantly clear but you never said anything substantial other than accuse them of being mall crawlers, ugly, or grocery getters. This is what you originally said...
Meh.. the 80 series (non US version) was the last of the real cruisers. Everything beyond that has the styling only a soccer mom could love. Besides, if it aint got an oh **** bar then its not a real cruiser.
I don't agree with you or the overwhelming evidence that you've presented to prove your point. Also, there is no more OS bar on the PS dash because it obstructs air bag deployment.
Aside from styling preferences, they are extremely capable vehicles off-road. I've seen them do well - they aren't modified rock crawlers but they hold their own, just like any original FJ-60, FZJ-80, or UZJ-100. Besides, why would civilian and governmental agencies be using them world-wide now if they weren't any good in countries like Haiti, Afghanistan, Iraq, and any other place with an undeveloped road infrastructure. Another forum member cited a 200 series Land Cruisers 47,000 mile use around his country on some of the most difficult terrain on the planet and then you differentiate 4WD vehicles vice
real Land Cruisers? All Land Cruisers
are 4WD. Just what is
your definition of a real Land Cruiser?
In the TN mountains...
In the backwoods of VA...
In Helmand Province, AFG...
If you have facts, provide them, we want to know them.
If you have a personal opinion not based on any facts than state it as so, but when presented with fact-based accounts and actual experience with the vehicle, I recommend reconsidering your opinion.