Other things to note is the size difference. Notice how much larger the head is on the OB2. This tells a story. It's much more efficient at dissipating heat and which is why it can be 100% duty cycle at 200 PSI.
The rest of the story is told by the power consumption. Extreme Aire 82 amps draw @ 100 psi, 2.6 CFM vs. OB2 35 amps draw @ 100 PSI, 2.47 CFM
This is where we have to be careful in the absence of industry standardized testing procedures. As an engineer I can tell you one of the two companies isn't telling the truth, and I lean towards the OB2.
The adiabatic compression efficiency of piston compressors are very similar, given a similar design (reed valve teflon lubed), displacement, and rpm (both direct driven DC motor). It's extremely (no pun intended) unlikely one is 40% as efficient as the other.
My guess, either the OB2 doesn't put out those numbers, or the amp draw is higher than stated.
Why? Think about a 3450 rpm 120v home compressor. To achieve 2.47 CFM @ 100psi, it'll take a LOT more than a 3.5 amp motor (on 120V). Most compressors putting out those volumes are running around 7 to 9 amps (@120V), which not surprisingly, is close to the Extreme Aire's 82 Amp @ 12V.