maxingout
Adventurer
I am surprised by the lack of H1 Hummers posting on the Expedition Portal. H1s are awesome trucks that do expeditions around the world every day in Afganistan, Iraq, and dozens of countries around the world. I cannot imagine a more capable expeditionary vehicle - but you don't have to ask me - ask the Marines, Army, Air Force, and every other service member who spends months living out of one each year.
The differences in capability between a civilian H1 and the military Humvee is negligible. It's mainly creature comforts.
People who bash Hummers have never done an expedition in one.
People who bash Land Rover 110s have never done an expedition in one.
The same can be said for Nissans, Toyotas, Mitsubishis, Jeeps, etc.
Every vehicle is a compromise, and you select your particular compromises based on your financial resources, experience, and the area of the world where you are wheeling. Some vehicles are suited for rock climbing, some for narrow trails, and most can be driven as an expeditionary vehicle around the world depending on which compromises you select and are comfortable with.
If Bagnold could drive Model T Fords on expeditions in the Libyan and Egyptian sands, then it does not make sense to bash any 4x4 vehicle.
I do not understand vehicle bashing. I have owned 5 Land Rover 110s, 1 Land Rover 130, 1 Toyota FJ40, 1 full size Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 Volkswagen Combi, and 1 H1 Hummer. All of them make great expeditionary vehicles that I would be happy to drive around the world. I could write pages of reasons why each of these vehicles would be my first choice for a world expedition.
It's not the vehicle. It's the way you outfit it and drive it on your trip around the world.
The differences in capability between a civilian H1 and the military Humvee is negligible. It's mainly creature comforts.
People who bash Hummers have never done an expedition in one.
People who bash Land Rover 110s have never done an expedition in one.
The same can be said for Nissans, Toyotas, Mitsubishis, Jeeps, etc.
Every vehicle is a compromise, and you select your particular compromises based on your financial resources, experience, and the area of the world where you are wheeling. Some vehicles are suited for rock climbing, some for narrow trails, and most can be driven as an expeditionary vehicle around the world depending on which compromises you select and are comfortable with.
If Bagnold could drive Model T Fords on expeditions in the Libyan and Egyptian sands, then it does not make sense to bash any 4x4 vehicle.
I do not understand vehicle bashing. I have owned 5 Land Rover 110s, 1 Land Rover 130, 1 Toyota FJ40, 1 full size Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 Volkswagen Combi, and 1 H1 Hummer. All of them make great expeditionary vehicles that I would be happy to drive around the world. I could write pages of reasons why each of these vehicles would be my first choice for a world expedition.
It's not the vehicle. It's the way you outfit it and drive it on your trip around the world.
Last edited: