Thanks for the input. As a proud owner of several Land Rovers which include a 1967 IIa 88, a 1972 101 FC and an expedition prepped and used 95 Range Rover LWB, I assure you it was far from a great vehicle.
It would have cost at least two to three times as much to do a decent basic frame-off restoration which it would have required. It cost us a fraction of that using mostly scrap metal to form a chassis, suspension and roll cage/exo-cage, then shoehorning a Deuce & 1/2 Continental multi-fuel powerplant, drive-train and Rockwell axles into it.
True it's not for everyone though it was built to our liking by us and we trust it will than satisfy the kid in us. We're also not Land Rover designers or structural or metalurgical engineers.
Knowing the limitations of the vehicle (which is loosely based on a rock racer suspension) we built the exo-cage in anticipation of what could happen. And should it ever tip over we'll likely need a helicopter to get it upright.
Regardless of what anyone here thinks keep in mind that we're Land Rover aficionados and off roaders too, and thoroughly enjoy the capability of our vehicles just as much as the places they take us to as much as most of you.
And if in doubt you can see pictures of some of our vehicles at the last Rover Rendezvous held a few weeks ago in July.
I'm sure some form of technical expertise is needed here. It is clean. It looks like it is well done. And for those reasons you usually have to at least respect what others do... but it is still a waste of what was a great vehicle.