Search results

Around here an STX is more than an XLT and my local lot doesn't even have any supercabs period, never mind an XL or STX. I too would rather see Tremor as a package you could add to other trims and cab styles.

I'm going to complain about price for the regular F150 nevermind the extra expensive tremor trim/package whatever. XLTs have MSRP of in the high forties and low 50s now.

I don't know where you live but torsion bars are the least of your worries on a truck that was discontinued 10 years ago. 1998-2012 was previous gen ranger. Vacuum hub issues on 98-01 or whenever they changed to front half shafts that always spin. Rear spring perch rusting out. Body rusting...

I'd also go 2.5". You generally don't get taller or more limber with age.

I'm starting to question only having two 6 volt batteries now after seeing the above consumption pattern math. But then again other than charging phones and the iPad, using lights and using the fan a bit, we've gotten by on a single 12 volt with 45ah usable, and a 90 watt peak portable solar...

I've not been super happy with either of my sets of KO2s especially for the price. I'm not mad, but not happy LT235/80R17 and LT34x10.5R17 on same truck. The 235 chunked tread in 90% fleet duty. Poor wet pavement and asphalt performance. Mediocrity in winter but that's fair being it's an all...

How about back to Ford not being able to figure out more than one main name for multiple vehicles??? Durrrr.... Transit connect. How about the big van we make in Europe coming to NA? Durrrr... Transit. .. .... Dats it . Ok so we are bringing back the Bronco ... "Dah Bronco".. Ok ok ok, nice...

What rear axle does the ranger use? I thought it would be a shorter track super 8.8

I'd look at a modular contractor type rack, I don't know if one exists that can go from an 8' bed to 6.5 or 5.5 on the same body style truck at all If so, and you can center the dry boxes between the posts as mentioned by others, you have a good start. And if the rack is modular you could keep...

I have a 2014 SCAB with 3.73 and 34x10.5R17. When I had 235/80R17 it wasn't really any different. In Manitoba they will gladly crucify you if you get caught driving 85 MPH. I generally drive 110 kph on the highway so that's like 68 MPH? Waaaaaaay back when I had the soft 235/75R17 P rated...

How do you Americans get such high fuel economy in the F150? Especially considering your tiny gallons and especially extra especially considering your 70-90 mph highways??? Do you all have 3.31 gearing? If I run a couple hundred kms at 100 kph so let's say 125 miles at 60 mph, I'll be excited...

We have 8-12 people living in a bus shelter on a main road near me. They've been living there for months. AFAIK all have addictions and mental health issues and most refuse to go to shelters. Downtown I do some work, and I've almost stepped in people poop right on the sidewalk. These people are...

That's lighter than I expected. What's total payload available on the truck?

I think some black body decals would really make that truck pop at this point Looks good! What does that bed tray weigh?

Looks good! The Morimoto are big $ but supposedly the best, how do you like them so far? Hopefully RCI keeps making skid plates for the F150.

As for SFA, I'll give the WJ grand Cherokee as an example. You could do 3" lifts for cheap, it was mostly springs, shocks, and a front track bar. Once you went 4" it was new upper and lower control arms, different front drive shaft, etc. Six inch was the same thing but absolutely required long...

Yes sorry in NA entirely different platforms. Sorry I can't be of help.

OP Are you in North America?

The KO2 in 34x10.5R17 also measures super small, same OD as BFG KM2 in 255/80R17, it might be an option as well, but its an expensive tire. Id vote for a 255/80 spare if you can find one at a good price.

Im driving a 3.7 steel body F150 with 33s and I can't break 20 MPG US driving 60 mph. When towing my pop up in the wind its been as low as 13 MPG and im expecting 12-14 towing my new trailer when I get it. So adding 80 HP and 152 tq and all at lower RPM, 10 MPG doesn't seem so bad. Now the new...