Road tests on bigger wheels years ago brought out pros and cons. First, tho, the backset needs to be close or it pushes the tread more to one side which may cause rubbing. This is the #1 problem with swaps.
Lug pattern must be identical, spacers create issues and double the lug failures.
A larger diameter affects the drive ratio and reduces the leverage of gears. It doesn't take off or climb as well. Going lower profile to retain the same diameter makes the ride harsher and reduces improved grip when airing down. Less sidewall to puncture tho.
Larger tire assemblies usually weigh more increasing rotational inertia, reducing stopping ability. Along with the change in effective gear ratio, many see a minor mileage drop because they still want the truck to accelerate like it did. And prices generally go up, with less sizes available. Large rims cater to what the factory offered, with less upsizing than we had even ten years ago.
And for all that, a locker does far more in traction than bigger tires. What you dont hear anymore are the experienced 4WD who told us lockers first, then tires. I'm like you guys, needed tread to replace bald hiway tread, budget said stick to stock size on factory rims. I got some traction with open tread, a locker was 3x better. Made the real difference.
Big diameters can roll over bad terrain better, but there is always a bigget pothole, and we often drive on pavement more than dirt. Balancing the two is the better choice. We improve incrementally. Unimogs jump ahead, but they arent all that getting groceries.