The stock airbox on my truck is actually really good. It incorporates some cyclonic dust separation and big filter element. Not sure I'll be in a hurry to get rid of it. Looking at the parts online, it seems like I could just... relocate it. It's a (mostly) self-contained metal drum.
It looks like something off a tractor...
I can also leave the airbox where it is (forward left of the engine) and run pipes aft to the turbo. In theory, all of the standing air in the tubes becomes mass the engine/turbo has to move. So it's not a great thing, I'm just not sure how much it really affects anything. I'll do some tubing estimates and some math to calculate the mass of air being moved, and the energy required. If i move the airbox I could put a snorkel on the back. It's not rational or useful, but I'm a big fan of snorkels. And yeah, the snorkel adds tubing that adds air mass that has to be moved, etc... probably a similar amount to leaving the airbox in the stock location.
I was considering the nature of engineering over the weekend (again), focusing on amateur engineering, like building a DIY camper. People who are low on money tend to underbuild their structure/system, etc... I think the reasons are obvious. Stuff costs money and the right-er the stuff, the more it tends to cost. People with money tend to overbuild. This is a little trickier, I think. I think some of this os for the Farkle; to have functional sparkle that might not really serve a purpose in a given use case. My snorkel is a good example. I just want a snorkle. I don't need it, but it's cool. The other reason is more related to why people without money underbuild. Those folks don't know that their build is under specked, and the folks with money don't know their build is over-specked.
I talked with an acquaintance about building a custom flatbed for a new project. His plan was to use 2x4x 5/16 steel for 8 lateral supports along an 8 foot span. I did a quick beam analysis on one member using the entire proposed camper weight and found .04" deflection, now divide that across 16 supports, and it's clearly overbuilt. Not by a little, but by quite a lot. This doesn't pose a large problem, but it does effect the overall build and if a design philosophy trend to overbuilding, you will end up with a heavy truck.
This all gets back to what engineering is. It's making a series of compromises based on a set of constraints to meet a set of product or system goals. No decision is clearly good or bad, but almost all decisions have effects on other aspects of the system or product. Clearly establishing the system/product goals up front and using data and analytics to understand the compromises are what makes 'good' engineering.
In other build news, I added a rubber flap over the back of the pop-up where the top meets the camper body. I could see where water would run in if I parked on a grade and didn't want the hassle. I also added some bond-on studs to the front of the camper to install a wind dam between the truck cab and the camber overhang.
Bonded studs are an interesting option if you understand your loading and bond strength of your chosen adhesive.
