2019 F350 6.2L 4WD build thread; HPI flatbed, ATO AterraXL composite camper, Carli/King, 37s, 4.88s, etc

[mk216v]

Have you recalibrated the speedo for the 37s?

With the Rams is crucial to adjust the speedo properly with bigger tires, to get the transmission shifting properly. Otherwise it shifted super early and annoying.

No idea if Fords are the same, but after getting my speedo dialed in perfectly, the transmission was much happier and normal shifting

My .02

97.62% of your build time was deciding on tires

Sooooooo ?

Not yet. Need to drive 6+hrs round trip for a Forscan re-do. Will advise further after that, especially now that the scan for 37s won't cause the CEL I was dreading.

Copy that thx!

Yeah I know, it was a lot of surmising on future weights and data mining, but I must say, thx to @montypower's videos, I'm very very happy with the Yoko X-AT's in D load at 50psi. Will keep everyone apprised as to their treadwear.

 

[RAM5500 CAMPERTHING]

Not yet. Need to drive 3+hrs for a Forscan re-do. Will advise further after that, especially now that the scan for 37s won't cause the CEL I was dreading.

Just buy the hypertech Calibrator gizmo so you have the tool forever and will probably save money versus 6 hours of driving/fuel.

Hypertech gizmo for my truck was about $200 and as of this post, we’ve done 4 different trucks with it

#yourewelcome

 

[mk216v]

And no more 6.2 / 6 speed for 2023. See how the new 6.8 / 10 speed does as a slimmed down 7.3 / 10 speed? Could drive demand for used 6.2 / 6 speeds as it sunsets.

I'm out of it; a new 6.8L NA? Why spend the money engineering that vs just having the 7.3 as the only NA engine?? Bean counters make no sense much of the time, either for spending or lack of spending.

Just buy the hypertech Calibrator gizmo so you have the tool forever and will probably save money versus 6 hours of driving/fuel.

Hypertech gizmo for my truck was about $200 and as of this post, we’ve done 4 different trucks with it

#yourewelcome

Understood, but visiting my Ford wizard gets me time catching up, drooling over his latest custom project, playing with coding on other modules, checking this/that, brainstorming other upgrades, etc.

 

[Ninelitetrip]

Brand new 6.8 NA / 10 speed, updated 7.3, High Output version of 6.7 diesel.

 

[Chadx]

I'm out of it; a new 6.8L NA? Why spend the money engineering that vs just having the 7.3 as the only NA engine?? Bean counters make no sense much of the time, either for spending or lack of spending.

No re-engineering. Simplifying drivetrain, actually. the 6.8, unlike the 6.2, is identical to the 7.3 so just some bore/stroke magic to have a base engine and a "premium" engine, but get rid of the very different 6.2 engine. And I think it's the same 10 speed for both the 6.8 and 7.3 so one production run and one set of part numbers moving forward. Economy of scale will make this a good economical move for Ford.

 

[Explorerinil]

No re-engineering. Simplifying drivetrain, actually. the 6.8, unlike the 6.2, is identical to the 7.3 so just some bore/stroke magic to have a base engine and a "premium" engine, but get rid of the very different 6.2 engine. And I think it's the same 10 speed for both the 6.8 and 7.3 so one production run and one set of part numbers moving forward. Economy of scale will make this a good economical move for Ford.

Very good point. Plus the 6.8/7.3 are a far simpler design with more robust parts. No more 16 spark plugs to change or cam phasers to fail.

 

[Kingsize24]

Very good point. Plus the 6.8/7.3 are a far simpler design with more robust parts. No more 16 spark plugs to change or cam phasers to fail.

Absolutely!!! I'm so sick of that gen of engine it's ridiculous. Engineering nightmare IMO.

 

[kpredator]

Did you add breathers to transmission
And diff?
Ive got a 17 6.7 350, my 60 gallon transfer
Flow and 2nd tire on front bumper are
My best mods.

 

[Ninelitetrip]

No re-engineering. Simplifying drivetrain, actually. the 6.8, unlike the 6.2, is identical to the 7.3 so just some bore/stroke magic to have a base engine and a "premium" engine, but get rid of the very different 6.2 engine. And I think it's the same 10 speed for both the 6.8 and 7.3 so one production run and one set of part numbers moving forward. Economy of scale will make this a good economical move for Ford.

6.8 NA 10R100 Transmission. F250 / 350 XL / XLT trim levels.

7.3 NA Godzilla "upgraded" 10R140 Transmission. (Same as 6.7) All trim levels?

6.7 Standard and 6.7 High Output. (larger oil pan, Water Jacketed Turbo) 10R140 Transmission. (Same as 7.3) All trim levels.

 

[tacollie]

I have a 6.2 with the 6 speed and 3.73s. It's not the same but in manual mode I downshift when we start up a pass. It'll pull passes in 5th instead of letting the computer shift down to 4th on it's own. I've gained about 1.5mpgs and it's a more calm experience. Last trip I averaged 13.2mpgs. With the 10 speed you may have to manually shift an extra click. I enjoy the extra engagement driving but I get that it's not for everyone.

 

[RAM5500 CAMPERTHING]

A lot of posts about how to do all these things to get your transmissions to work to your liking… ?

#fordthings

 

[Ninelitetrip]

Just buy the hypertech Calibrator gizmo so you have the tool forever and will probably save money versus 6 hours of driving/fuel.

Hypertech gizmo for my truck was about $200 and as of this post, we’ve done 4 different trucks with it

#yourewelcome

Ford specific is also the FORScan software. I use it on my smartphone and tablet for diagnostics. Extended License Windows version I believe can reprogram?

Comparison of FORScan applications

Download FORScan

Pair it with the OBD MX+ WiFi version.

OBDLink® MX+ - Outstanding Bluetooth-Compatible OBD II Scan Tool

The OBDLink® MX+ is the top-of-the-line OBD II scan tool to use with forscan and comes with bluetooth. Get one here today and gain access to your vehicle!

www.obdlink.com

 

[Macfly]

Definitely mine is shifting too low, and making the engine lug, once I find someone with a ForScan setup who knows how to use it I'm thinking that the shift point should be closer to 2500rpm, but maybe also adding to the computer that it's on 37's might help.

 

[rruff]

No re-engineering. Simplifying drivetrain, actually. the 6.8, unlike the 6.2, is identical to the 7.3

In the video he mentions the 6.8 is more optimized for efficiency while the 7.3 gets more power, so I guess that will be a way to differentiate. It makes sense to have a "new" base engine that shares so much with the 7.3, but at the same time the all the development cost of the 6.2 was done years ago, and they just needed to churn them out. The 10spd has also been mated with it as an option. And it's an engine with a good rep. I guess my point is that they really didn't need a new base engine, and it saves them money only compared to developing something completely new... unless the marginal cost of producing the 6.8 is actually less than the 6.2.

 

[mk216v]

Absolutely!!! I'm so sick of that gen of engine it's ridiculous. Engineering nightmare IMO.

Sick of the 6.2?

I have a 6.2 with the 6 speed and 3.73s. It's not the same but in manual mode I downshift when we start up a pass. It'll pull passes in 5th instead of letting the computer shift down to 4th on it's own. I've gained about 1.5mpgs and it's a more calm experience. Last trip I averaged 13.2mpgs. With the 10 speed you may have to manually shift an extra click. I enjoy the extra engagement driving but I get that it's not for everyone.

Copy that thx, I'll try this more often and report back.