Todd780
OverCamper
Nah. Scrape it till ya make it, lolBesides, what narrow trails? F350, F150, Jeep, and the Ranger, are all the exact same darn size. What size is that? Too big for any trails around here.
Nah. Scrape it till ya make it, lolBesides, what narrow trails? F350, F150, Jeep, and the Ranger, are all the exact same darn size. What size is that? Too big for any trails around here.
Don't disagree, but that's not really a comparison. It would be like me comparing a SXS to Class 1 car.
Sure it is...it is all relative was my point. Full-size truck might feel massive to some but small to others. Size difference between the two isn't night and day, splitting hairs really. If a person has trouble putting a 1/2 ton 99% of the places a midsize can go, they have bigger problems than the size of their truck.
View attachment 508665
As for guys who buy mid-sizes for running trails, how often do they really go? I'll be on trails 3 times this week, maybe 4 if I play my cards right. Of course the trails I am running you can't even fit a SXS down let alone a mid-size truck. It is all relative. Trails I like are about as wide as that license plate on that F-150 in the picture above.
Back to regularly scheduled news ABOUT the Ranger.
I've been tracking my mileage by hand over the last couple fillups and right at about 19.2 mpg, dash says 20.1. Mixed driving, 75% highway, some up into the hills with dirtbike in back, the other 25% is stop and go and city.
I much prefer the ride with 400 lbs of gear in the back....which aligns with many reviewers, it's a bit harsh empty.
I really like the powerband of the engine, never hunts and hills with moto gear it cruises up 2-3k RPM and plenty to accelerate.
Bummer about the milage, was hoping for at least mid 20's or a little more. Even with all the engineering wizardry, gassers are about at their limits for fuel efficiency. Maybe if Ford drops a diesel in, it will break 30.
Have you towed anything with it yet, and does the milage take a nose dive like other turbo gassers in Ford's line-up that shall not be named. Would imagine it tows quite fine though. Power numbers seem about right for that size of truck. Not too much not too little.
Starting to see a few running around here, nice looking truck. Though I think I prefer the size of the previous gen. An old girlfriend of mine had a regular cab, man! the out of the way places you could get that thing into, don't think we could do the same with the new one.
Depends on what your are comparing it too I'd guess, but in no way would I agree with your buddy. It honestly drives more like my VW TDI, lots of smooth low end torque vs initial get up and go, if that makes sense. Keeps me happy and I'm coming off a new Audi SQ5.Buddy of mine was on the launch team, said he felt like the 2.3L was an absolute dog. What has everyone else's experience been?
There are some cheap tunes coming out for the Ranger also, +75 hp +92 tq. Then there is this too @ 310 hp and 385 tq:People said that about the 6.2 as well. And it dyno's in at 400hp with just a minor tune.
Some people just can't drive. ''What's the minus button on the shifter for?.....''