I cant wait to see the Jeep purists heads' explode when the see that Mopar is already offering a "lowering" kit. Yep you read that right. i will just leave this here....
Maybe it starts a career as a WRC Rally car, or whatever the current organization for that is. A dirt road-course car? 4-wheel-drive drifting?
I still think it's cool.
Pete
Jeep purists will NEVER be happy, ever.
Even if Jeep builds a very capable solid axle vehicle, it would never please them short of building a monster tube buggy. Otherwise they wouldn't have (and still be) dissing the JK like they do, (go see how many baffoons are berating the JK on Jeepforum).
I no longer call them Jeep purists, but delusional if anything. The Renegade is an excellent design for a small SUV, far better than the Compass and Patriot, and sure to bring in loads of more revenue for Jeep to continue supplying the delusionals with their damn rock buggy, which they will ***** and moan about every reiteration anyway (don't get me wrong, I love the Wrangler and will be right there crying bloody murder if Jeep messes it up), but come on, not EVERY model must be solid axle and ladder frame!
As for the Renegade, perfect design for anyone needing a small vehicle with some capability but not wanting overkill, Jeep nailed it with this model. The KL Cherokee is the only one I would have done differently, but with the Wrangler, Grand Cherokee and Renegade, those are 3 winners, and I'll be anxiously awaiting the new Grand Wagoneer this year or next year.
It's not for me but I hope thousands of others don't feel the same
Saw the Renegade @ Genova Motorshow today. It's a funny little car , that surely has a place in the new Global Markets. The name "Renegade" is correct , this car is a new start for Jeep , a new start in a new decade , for new markets. And no its defenitly not a "relooked" Panda.
Ok the interior looks a bit " Italian plastic" but the biggest handicap is the VIN number : it's a Fiat VIN ??
View attachment 214255
Gtrts
They blew it by not offering a manual in the US. Same with the Cherokee.
I would've considered both if not for that oversight.
Why is that a deal breaker? autos have better mileage than manuals, are faster and the get in and go is great. Not having to worry about clutches and rowing your way home is a total bonus.
I have yet to see an auto turn out better mileage in the real world.
A dual clutch is faster, but a regular auto rarely is unless geared better.
"Worrying" about clutches and rowing my way home is the whole point. I want to drive my cars, not just ride in them.