Since we are almost talking about this, I took some shots of the frame and subframe for posting. I would love some input as to wether or not keeping the subframe would be worth it over replacing with aluminum or dumping it all together.
The subframe squares off at the rear of the vehicle, even with the main frame
The small box in the subframe on the right is a military pintle tow bar about 3 meters long, and it will be gone. The bed is squarely bolted to the subframe here, and the subframe is squarely bolted to the main frame.
Midway up the bed from the rear, subframe still bolted squarely to the main frame, but the bed is bolted to the subframe with a small flex joint. Doesn't look like it would flex very much.
Up closer to the front of the bed near the cab, you can see the subframe is bolted here with what I am only guessing is some kind of break-away mount. The bed itself is attatched to the subframe just forward of this with a large flex mount (my divorced T-case is just visible bottom of photo).
Here is the large flex mount for the bed attatchment to the subframe, there is also another break-away mount for the subframe forward of that.
If you look past the air tanks, or the opposite side frame rail, you can see how the subframe terminates in a slope, I assume to allow the subframe some flex on the end to prevent stress points on the main frame. Top center you can also see the springs for the suspension cab.
To save wieght, I have considered removing the center section of the subframe with the same bevel cuts as at the front, leaving a section at the front and rear for mounting the box.
I just dont know if having the full length subframe is nessecary or overkill (a little overkill is not bad) or if an aluminum subframe would even be as strong.