Coilovers: are they worth the cost?

jeffryscott

2006 Rally Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
As I explore options for my 4Runner, I've been looking at Tundra springs, Old Man Emu springs/shocks, Bilsteins, etc ... but am also beginning to consider one of the coilover options.

People have seen me drive offroad :smiley_drive: and I know several members run the more expensive coilover setups and I have to ask: given my driving style and my new rig, is it worth it?

Thanks,

Jeff
 

Dave Bennett

Adventurist
Personally, the Donahoes have been great for my truck. The faster I go through whoops or on washboard, the better they ride. The fact that they are rebuildable was a major selling point for me. One of my top 3 mods.

To answer your question: YES!
 

Scott Brady

Founder
anyone who competes against you in the Expedition Trophy will tell you to save the $$$ :)




Next time I see you we will take the Taco for a little spin and you can try them out... :smiley_drive:
 

erin

Explorer
One of my biggest complaints was the OEM front end constantly bottoming out on the slightest whop, so it had to go. I couldn't be more happy with the Donahoes. Expensive, but well worth the money in my mind.
 

jeffryscott

2006 Rally Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
It took me a minute to understand your post Scott ... I thought I'd be able to save some money. oh well.

One of the complaints at yotatech is the coilovers don't stand the weight of a winch bumper over a prolonged period and are not as good in the rocks - too stiff. They shine in fast driving/washboard though, they say.

What say ye?

And BajaTaco went from the 2.0 to the 2.5-inch Racerunner? How much of a difference is there? Do you, if you read this, really only notice a difference if you are hitting it pretty hard (washboard dirt, high speed?) or are they worth the extra price all around?

as always, thanks.
 

Desertdude

Expedition Leader
More importantly for me on my Tacoma - the Donahoe coil-overs stabilized the ride on road - all the gains off-road were a real bonus
 

Scott Brady

Founder
I probably have one of the heaviest Tacomas on the planet :)

No problems with the bumper and winch, though you do need to add more preload. Works great in the rocks too, as I have no pitch or sway and without the swaybar, articulation and responsiveness is excellent.

I just got a set of custom Donahoe's, which unique valving and high corrosion resistant bodies. I will let everyone know the difference.

Just make sure to resist the urge of cranking in a bunch of lift. That comes at the expense of extension travel (there is a fixed range in the IFS without major upgrades, so you give up 1" of extension travel for every 1" of lift/increased compression travel)
 

jeffryscott

2006 Rally Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
thanks for the answers, I figured as much, but since others have brought up those issues, I just wanted some affirmation ...

so, Scott, what did you do with your old, obsolete, worn-out coilovers ...:rolleyes:
 

BajaTaco

Swashbuckler
jeffryscott said:
One of the complaints at yotatech is the coilovers don't stand the weight of a winch bumper over a prolonged period and are not as good in the rocks - too stiff. They shine in fast driving/washboard though, they say.

What say ye?

Coilovers will stand the weight of a winch bumper, but they need to have a proper spring to do so. Generally speaking for the Tacoma/4Runner, a 650# or 675# spring will work well. Also, the longer the spring, the less pre-load is required to achieve the same "lift". Regardless, if the only thing you are using for damping on the front of the truck is a coilover shock, any truck will ride better the lighter it is, especially if matched with a proper spring rate. This is just a trade-off of having a heavy front end. If you want to make a heavy front end ride like a light one, you need to go custom and add more $$ to the suspension (long travel, bypass shocks, air bumps). As far as being too stiff, unless you are a guy who only does rock crawling trails, I wouldn't worry about it. If you are doing enough highly technical rock trails that it becomes a problem, then you probably shouldn't be using the IFS anyway (convert it to solid axle). IMO, the benefits of a high quality c/o far outweigh any disadvantage here and there are plenty of trails that have been succesfully run with IFS & c/o's to prove that.


jeffryscott said:
And BajaTaco went from the 2.0 to the 2.5-inch Racerunner? How much of a difference is there? Do you, if you read this, really only notice a difference if you are hitting it pretty hard (washboard dirt, high speed?) or are they worth the extra price all around?

In a nutshell, I think the only difference between the 2.0 and 2.5 are larger internals and a little added cooling capacity with the larger diameter. You can actually get a higher spring rate, with a longer coil using the 2.0's (which requires less preload and therefore allows the spring to work better). But the little bit of added oil capacity and larger internals of the 2.5 is nice. Bottom line - I would be totally happy with either one. For in depth comments from me on this, you can read this post.

By the way, I haven't had a chance to congratulate you on your new Toyota Jeff - so CONGRATS!! :beer:
 
yes, they are worth it on a number of levels.

guys with tundras over the years have had trouble with the springs that fit the 2.0" shock bodies, once they start running a winch with an aftermarket "armor" bumper. it's just too much weight for the smaller diameter springs to support laterally, and they eventually bend in the middle...like a banana. think of compressing a click pen spring...it tries to bow to the side, and smaller diameter springs will do the same thing. the springs are shaped different from oem springs...straight profile, no coning at the spring seat on the shock like oem.

the springs that fit the 2.5" bodies seem to support the load better. as far as the shock body, unless you're running the baja, there is little difference between a 2.0 and a 2.5 body...really, theres no need for a 2.5" body on tundras, tacos or runners for our purposes...but youll want the wider spring once you load it up.

eibach and...ummmm...hyperco? whoever makes donahoe's coils...are both quality. i dont remember who made the old "swayaway" branded coils from a few years back, but i did manage to thoroughly fatigue a set on a fully loaded tundra with the v8 and an arb bumper, no winch. the new donahoes reportedly have a very, very good spring. it is shorter (13") but not wound as tight as the 15" eibachs on the front of my truck. the length doesnt make a difference, it's not possible to overextend the spring in the stock location on toyota ifs, the springs are just designed different. ive never coil-locked the 15" eibachs. dunno how the eibach and dr coil stack up over time as relates to fatigue, i havent had a chance to flog the eibachs the way i did the old saw coils. the dr coils are supposed to fatigue less over time than everything else, goes the marketing pitch. you cannot go wrong with the dr setup. the camburg-badged saw is also a very, very good shock, and they offer a package deal with their uniball upper control arm.

the great advantage of an adjustable, rebuildable coilover is you can usually choose your spring rate depending on your application--winch, no winch, prerunner vs armor bumper, etc--and when (not if) you emulsify or otherwise damage your shocks over the years, you can either rebuild them yourself or send them in for a rebuild (if emulsified, hard to diy due to compression requirement at the seal, and messy...but dr and saw have great customer service and quick turnaround time).

also, since youll be changing things around over time, you can adjust the ride height as you add sliders, skid plates, bumper, winch and other toys.

the new springs will be stiff, and unless you weight the truck properly for the new spring rate, you do run the risk of damaging things.

the higher you push the lift, the harsher it rides...as the static position of the lca drops, the tire has to move outward more in order to move up, so youll feel more bumps. it might not look like much, but youll notice when you pick up the front end, then set it down again, it sits higher than normal until the tires can scrub out to their normal position. go too high and youll be hitting the extension stops on the shock every time you go over a bump.

youll immediately notice a difference in handling due to the valving. youll also notice a difference in unloaded street handling, since it'll ride like it's on rails, but thats because the springs arent loaded properly...offroad, unloaded, it'll be "interesting". i'm having this problem right now since fiberglass and bumper mods weighs a lot less than sheetmetal and "stock" bumpers. once its loaded up, it'll ride like a cadillac.

youll never look back to non adjustable, non rebuildable coilovers :D.

i know we've been talking donahoe and now ive mentioned swayaway, there are also fox and king...but dr and saw have the most presence in the toyota community, they are active on several of the major online forums and their customer service is extremely good--very, very good people at both, all very supportive of the spectrum of users, from racing to weekend adventuring

-sean

*edit* sorry, i mustve been writing that at the same time as bajataco :p...some more info, then, and definately read his linked post. a couple more comments from me...the 14" 2.0 coils are rated at 650#, the 15" are 675#. the difference is about a single wrap (pitch is ~1 wrap per inch). you cannot go wrong with the eibach coils, from everything ive heard. i got them (the 15s) through kartek and replaced the 14" saw coils that i fatigued to 13" via a good desert pounding at ~3T gvw. kartek is great for replacement parts, if you wanted you could buy an entire coilover piecemeal from them and assemble it yourself. extremely helpful there also.

never, ever adjust your coilovers on the truck, unless you *absolutely* have to (shouldnt ever be the case). they are easy to take on and off, it's far easier to adjust them on the bench, and you'll avoid galling the aluminum adjusting collar on the steel shock body--theyll corrode together and then you have to cut the collar off with a chop saw, assuming the coil isnt loaded when its off the truck! i used cv grease, but superlube (teflon) would probably work better. gunk the stuff all over the area where youll be turning the adjusting collar, adjust them off the truck (might take a try or two, but it's worth it, and donahoes come adjusted at iirc 2" lift from the factory anyway), check the height on the truck, once youre satisfied (use a caliper to check differences in height between the lca and bumpstop, make it equal so the truck can be aligned easier), wipe the excess grease away--dont sweat the grease under the coil next to the collar, it will help in the long run--then put a big, fat fillet of clear silicone sealant--rtv--in the corner between the adjusting collar and the exposed threads (not the side with the spring). run it up the exposed threads an inch or so, and at least halfway across the adjusting collar surface, all the way around. it comes off very easy, and prevents moisture from penetrating the threads between the adjusting collar and the shock body. the clear sealant lets you see the condition of the threads...if you need to adjust them, just pull the rtv off, clean the exposed threads with a wire brush, grease thoroughly, and adjust as necessary. that procedure has lasted two salty midwest winters and i'm still able to adjust the collars.
 
Last edited:

SOAZ

Tim and Kelsey get lost..
I'd say yes, but if you are not using it offroad constantly and in some precarious situations you should be fine with some bil 5100's, There are a lot of things for "expedition" travel that I would recomend first.
When I was into just day offroading and running the desert courses I was all about suspension performance and in that case it is definately worth it and got the donahoes. I've had, racerunners, spacers, bil 5100s and then when I worked for donahoe, I had them. I promise there is nothing smoother than the donahoes. We would catch shops like Cam$#%& calling and asking for our valving to try and copy it and even as far as sway-a-%$& selling our valving to fab%$^& when we started making the shocks ourselves.
(p.s. I did not like the ride of the old sway aways 2.0, the fabtechs made by fox, or the king coilovers, all very jerky)
By the way, They were so good that when I put Total Chaos long travel with a fox double bypass and coilover on my truck I was so disappointed by the infintesimally small improvement that I wanted to go back to donahoes...:confused:
Thats all I know. Hope it helps!!!
 

BajaTaco

Swashbuckler
BajaTaco said:
Generally speaking for the Tacoma/4Runner, a 650# or 675# spring will work well. ...




... In a nutshell, I think the only difference between the 2.0 and 2.5 are larger internals and a little added cooling capacity with the larger diameter. You can actually get a higher spring rate, with a longer coil using the 2.0's (which requires less preload and therefore allows the spring to work better). But the little bit of added oil capacity and larger internals of the 2.5 is nice. Bottom line - I would be totally happy with either one.

A little update to this:

Sway-A-Way no longer offers the 675lb coil for the 2.0" units, so I think these days the 2.5" units are the way to go if there will be any amount of additional weight on the front end. The standard 650lb. coils that come with 2.5" coilovers will work well with most stock-to-moderate loads up front and you will likely get a little better droop with the 650lb coils. But if you plan to go very heavy on the front end (extra battery, big winch, lights, etc) you can now get 700lb. coils for the 2.5" coilovers. They are available by request for new coilovers as well if you decide to get them up front - price is $50 more (ea.)) According to the SAW website, they come standard on the coilovers for the FJ cruiser. I believe you can get the 700# coils from Camburg as well.
 

tacollie

Glamper
I wish I would have started this thread a year ago. In the last year I went from stock to OME 882 to my SAWS 2.5". Everything everybody has been saying is what I was able to learn from experience. With a winch and a big bumper you are going to want a heavier spring rate. I am not talking ********** about allpro because I have used them with good experiences, but when I asked them why I should get their coilovers instead of the SAWS they said that the higher end coilovers are way nicer of a shock then I would probably ever use. That sold the SAWS. When I had the OME with the ARB bumper, winch, and no swaybar the truck drove decent but had a lot of body roll on road. It was horrible in the rocks. Every time the front rolled off a rock the it would go flying down. The truck is much better now and handles better on road without the swaybar than it did when I bought 6 years ago new. It is some much fun offroad now. If you can afford coilovers I would do it. My truck is better in every condition from the interstate to the rocks. That being said I would at least determine if you need a stiffer spring rate.
 

Redline

Likes to Drive and Ride
Thanks for reviving this thread guys.

I'm seriously considering Donahoes as the next suspension for the front of my 4Runner. I have already added 99% of my weight, have weighed it, and would weigh it again before I ordered anything.

I'm certainly heavy in front, but the rear is almost a perfect match, also heavy, but 100-lbs lighter. One concern I have is that I don't want to lose any of the lift that I have with my HD Old Man Emu springs. Scott advises not to crank the coil-overs too much to avoid limiting droop travel. I understand and agree with this, just need to figure if the coil-overs will handle the beef as well as the HD coil & strut set-up does. The only reason to change would be for the 'shock' part of the kit, so the suspension can handle high-speed runs for long distances without fatigue. I think the front spring is fine. Rides nice and smooth/soft most of the time but still seems to be able to absorb a lot.

In the rear, the OME spring is perfect everyday, and when heavily loaded I have Firestone Ride-Rites inside the coils, adjustable to support the extra weight as it changes. In the rear I would like to only change the shocks.

The OME suspension seems to work very well with my weight 5,440-lbs wet (not loaded for a trip). It even seemed to soak-up the landing from the bit of 'air' I caught on the ExPo Trophy sand course.

I guess the test should be to take off on a fast road with my Runner than repeat with someone's coil-overs set-up for a side-by-side comparison.
 
Last edited:

Willman

Active member
Great thread!

I vote Yes!!

I didn't even feel how high i got with my Donahoes on the ExPo sand course!

DSC03565.jpg


I love them! Worth every penny in my book! Great all around shock that gets the job done!

:elkgrin:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
187,926
Messages
2,900,095
Members
229,071
Latest member
fireofficer001
Top