You won't get any argument for me in defense of the 80 lamps functionally: lots of what's being done on this truck is more style than function. I could have left the wheels teflon, etc. But there's a style component in this build that pure utilitarians will undoubtedly see as a waste of money.
That said, this truck has more light output than my FJC with the two XMITTER units in the grille, and the FJC has plenty of light for (relatively unlit) drive from Kampala to Juba (I do my best to not move at night, but sometimes night falls sooner than you thought).
Worst case, I could add another XMITTER bar or additional individual lamps on the headache rack... but I don't think it'll be necessary.
Kermit - Remember that you're only looking at the supports for the grille, not what will be exposed. See the earlier cardboard mockup in this thread to see the grille design, which is much less "Dodge" looking. Also, I'd be surprised if most people who see this truck will have ever seen a Dodge product (aside from the more adventurous Jeeps, Chrysler products don't get overseas much).
You make a statement like this when you're removing a better, brighter head light (2012 Tacoma) and installing, best case scenario 15 year old lighting technology. One could actually say 21 year old lighting technology because I don't think they changed the 80 series headlights during the production run. It seems like fluff over function.
24H - This statement wasn't made to say that this build has the "best of the best" parts; it certainly doesn't. It has good enough parts for what I plan to do with it. But the statement was made to say that too often people will just bolt up a headlamp instead of transferring the lamp, the bracket, the harness, etc. My issue isn't with parts transplants or parts quality, it's with hackjob fabrication practices (the kind of thing too many second-hand owners on this forum discover down the road).