Experience With Preparing ISUZU NPS Camper: Brakes

IcedVolvo

Observer
Hi Again,

When we started this I thought the suspension was going to be the major problem but I was wrong! It has turned out the the brakes are becoming the real killer of this project!

To be blunt the standard brakes on the NPS are crap! (I do not know but the Fuso's could be even worse or better but perhaps WhatCharterBoat might like to comment here!).

The problem was detected as soon as we drove the truck and can be summed up in a two sentences:

1: the front brakes are NO WHERE NEAR strong enough and overheat way too easily
2: the rear brakes are WAY TOO strong and lock up way too easily

Now at first you may think this is not a serious problem but it is when you consider the following:

1: the rear brakes lock suddenly and unexpectedly; especially on wet roads

2: this truck has a VERY tight LSD fitted to the rear so when one wheel locks up so does the other

3: now you have the drive train locked up and if you have the clutch engaged, which is usual, you now have no engine and no power steering

4: all while sliding sideways in a truck on a wet road!

As well as ISUZU we have also had two very large truck brake specialists look at the problem (one in Sydney and one is Brisbane). They have both seen this problem in other lightly loaded NPS' (ours has 2400kg and 2500kg on the front and rear axles resp) and the only solution they have found is to put “lumps of concrete” in the rear of the trucks.

On our journey we have found a list of issues we have addressed:

1: The NPS does not have auto adjusting front brakes so they require constant adjustment to maximise pedal travel. I adjust mine every 2-3000km!!

2: The load bias valve in the rear required reseating and readjustment on a specialist brake roller (not just the arm but the whole valve body!).

3: The standard front brake linings not heat resistant enough, after several overheating episodes we have replaced with “tougher” linings. Note that the replacements are the same "hardness" as original linings but more heat resistant).

4: The front brakes need to be de-dusted routinely or else efficiency drops off and overheating increases as dust accumulates. No problem you say ...... but there's a catch: to remove the drums on this beast requires removing ALL the bearings, you cannot simply pull the drums off and blow the dust out! It takes about an hour at least and you should replace the seals when you do this.

HOWEVER ALTHOUGH IMPLEMENTING THE ABOVE HAS IMPROVED THE PROBLEM; NONE OF THESE MEASURES HAVE FIXED THE PROBLEM: THE BRAKES ARE STILL CRAP AND IN MY OPINION DOWNRIGHT DANGEROUS IN THE WET!!!!

The real problem is that lockup occurs very suddenly in both wheels and with no apparent reason: there is no apparent change in road surface, brake pressure or other outside influence that we can discern. You will be in a completely controlled braking and “BANG” suddenly both rear wheels will lock up and freeze the drive train. Because of this I now brake with the clutch in which places more demand on the brakes (no engine braking.......) and of course we end up getting the front brakes hot.

The problem is so bad that even as an ex rally driver I am actually scared to drive the truck in the wet and any extended downhill section in the wet can be truly terrifying. In a recent trip coming down from Armidale to Grafton the rear locked up unexpectedly and we almost went off the edge of the road over a cliff, despite literally “tip toeing” at the time.

There is one thing to left to try, both brake experts suspect that the rear axle could be moving around causing the rod that acts on the brake bias valve (more load => more brake force) to “jerk” on and off causing sudden pressure changes in the regulating valve pressure. Us altering the suspension to give more travel and softer spring rates could have made the problem even worse but as noted the problem does exist in "stock" trucks as well. So the last thing left to try is to disconnect the load sensing rod from the axle and use a simple pre-set manual adjustment (these trucks have a constant load so we don't need it to be variable anyway). this may help with the the problem.

I have investigated the problem extensively (as have some very smart brake experts) and there appears to be no real solution. Personally I would do ANY/ALL of the following regardless of cost, if they could be done:

1: retro fit an ABS system (stop back brakes locking). I have considered using an old 3 channel system from a Commodore.

2: fit a centre differential instead of the standard 4WD transfer case so we are in constant 4WD. This will spread the braking load to both front and rear axles.

3: fit disk brakes to the front. I could replace the standard front diff with a Dana front diff. This would allow much more braking force on the front wheels.

4: replace the LSD with a manual diff lock so both wheels do not lock at the same time and at least keep the engine (and power steering!!!!) going.

But after literally hundreds of phone calls I have not been able to find anyone in Australia who can do any of these modifications!!!

In retrospect if I had known this issue existed I would probably not have gone ahead with this chassis! That may seem a pretty harsh thing to say but this problem in combination with the suspension issues and a whole lot of body related issues (e.g. wading depth, fuel tanks etc) really has spoiled some significant part of the pleasure of the motorhome.

Ironically the problem goes away in off road 4WD because the braking effort is spread across both axles through the transfer box so perhaps the moral of the story is: STAY OFF ROAD AND IN 4WD!!

So in summary my advice to anyone considering this sort of project where you will spend a lot of time on the blacktop would be to bite the bullet and spend the extra $40k on a purpose built 4WD truck chassis like a MAN or Mercedes. I know the $120k+ might seem a lot but in the end it is worth it! Although they are bigger trucks (8-10 tonnes as opposed to the 6 tonne NPS) they come with full time 4WD, centre, front and rear diff locks, ABS, brilliant fully in cab adjustable suspension, 12 speed auto gearboxes, 22.5 wheels super singles, auto fill tyres, blah blah blah and so many extras that it makes every cent worthwhile.

I am sure WhatCharterBoat will have something to add to this :) What say you WCB????
 
Last edited:

alan

Explorer
Hi Icedvolvo,
I would give the proportioning valve the flick, and fit a manually adjustable unit so you can fine tune the braking balance. This what I have planned for my canter, a wilwood unit will cost you about $80.
 

Amesz00

Adventurer
Icedvolvo,
also try replacing the brake lines to braided stainless ones, i had the fronts done on my canter and seems to make a bit of difference to pedal feel.
other than that, it sounds almost like you have a dodgy truck mate, i have a canter and while the brakes are not very good at (39" michelins dont help at all), i have seen none of the issues you speak of, and i usually drive it quite hard. i love driving it on wet roads, simply BECAUSE it feels so sure footed. i cant see the brakes between the trucks being that different.
btw- old man says make sure that whoever services it puts LSD oil in the diff, reckons he has accidently put normal diff oil in canters and the LSD starts doing funny things, like locking when it shouldnt.
Andrew
 

whatcharterboat

Supporting Sponsor, Overland Certified OC0018
To be blunt the standard brakes on the NPS are crap! (I do not know but the Fuso's could be even worse or better but perhaps WhatCharterBoat might like to comment here!).

Hi Jon. Hey.....must be my shout for Thai next time. Nice waves ATM too heh?

Anyway, from our testing under very controlled conditions the data shows the NPS will brake better than the FG. Under all the various testing we've had to do to meet ADR regs with the bigger wheels and also for bus compliance, the FG only just complies as a bus if fitted with big wheels but they DO COMPLY.....well they do after a couple of mods. A bus standard is much higher than that required for a truck too by the way. The bias valve must be adjusted correctly and they need extra capacity in the vac tank. The NPS still needs extra vac capacity but only a tiny bit.......and that's what I'd expect too. The NPS brakes are wider at the rear and the drums are more segmented in their shape so inherently have more surface area and provide better cooling. I have never had a scare in a NPS 300 Isuzu and I really like driving them if the suspension's been sorted or they have a little weight on board as opposed to a bare cab chassis.

A little explanation re: the "testing".......They have to pass brake performance tests within a certain distance and at a given deceleration rate and G force with front axle brake failure, rear axle brake failure, vacuum failure, max GVM and unladen tare mass at various speeds up to 100kph, heat fade, etc. etc.etc. And then handbrake holding at gradient...All under very controlled conditions......calibrated and super accurate test apparatus, drums must be above a given temp, pedal application must not exceed a given force, vehicle must stay within a given lane, etc , etc, and there are a whole range of parameters that must be adhered to when it comes to generating heat for the fade test and procedures for a series of stops before a stop is measured without vacuum, etc, etc. It takes 2 or 3 days to get through a full test procedure on one vehicle to test for both bus and truck so it is a lot more involved than I could ever go into in a post. The engineers don't let you get away with anything either.......no excuses, no grey areas, no "close enough".....if the data doesn't support a pass, you have to work out why and sort it out....often that means re-booking the drag strip and coming back a week later.

As for your brakes Jon......I have no answer. Like you said, there have been some very clever people looking at your truck and they all seem stumped. It is light...probably one of the lightest NPS motorhomes around but it still shouldn't be enough to give the problems you describe.....and I know we've spoken over the phone about this before.

Possibly a manual bias valve is a good place to start......I don't fully understand the brake circuit through the NPS valve. It has an extra pipe that the Fuso FG doesn't have but I'm sure a Willwood agent would know if it could be replaced with an aftermarket manual one. We've tested FG's with the valve removed but that's another story. Actually of all the brake tests I've had to do, the NPS feels the most controllable in a simulated front axle brake failure...........I nearly spun a FSS 550 at 100kph at the end and an airstrip once doing this specific test and had the engineer turn white at Willowbank Dragstrip in an FG84 not too long back.......but the NPS was solid......imagine locking on the handbrake at 100kph in the wet in a car......that's what that test is like because of all the extra weight.

There are some really good aftermarket brake linings available for the FG's. Good improvement and at a fraction of the price of genuine.....I even know Fuso dealers that use them. I imagine you've already looked at your linings (front I'm talking about) and tried different ones?????

Do you go to Gold Coast Isuzu.....Doug down there is one of the best Isuzu guys I've met.....what's his opinion?

I'm sure everyone's told you to slow down but where's the fun in that.

As for the diff.......yes, they are a very tight for an LSD on the road (certainly tighter than an FG) but should be great in slippery or steep offroad situations because of this. Mind you I have never heard anyone complain about an FG rear either.

Thanks mate. Hope you have some joy soon.......you should be in SE Asia with it by now not hanging around workshops.
 
Last edited:

IcedVolvo

Observer
Icedvolvo,
also try replacing the brake lines to braided stainless ones, i had the fronts done on my canter and seems to make a bit of difference to pedal feel.

Hi Amesz,

This might be worth trying! I can see how the rubber ones would stretch even a little and take some of the fluid volume away from pedal travel.

other than that, it sounds almost like you have a dodgy truck mate, i have a canter and while the brakes are not very good at (39" michelins dont help at all),

ISUZU have just had the truck for three days for testing and they have put it down to the increased suspension travel playing havoc with the bias valve which is something I can play with. But that still doesn't address the problem that the front brakes are not strong enough and overheat too easily. This 6.5 GVM tonne truck only weighs a little over 4.5 tonnes and I should be able to stand on the front brakes all day and not overheat them! But we will keep at it and keep reporting here.
 

IcedVolvo

Observer
Hi Jon. Hey.....must be my shout for Thai next time. Nice waves ATM too heh?

Deal! And yes surf is pumpin although was a little too big yesterday, double overhead at Currumbin has been relegated to my youth, I just cant hold my breath for long enough and cant take the beating any more :( sigh!

Anyway, from our testing under very controlled conditions the data shows the NPS will brake better than the FG .....
.

Doesn't surprise me cos the brakes are bigger; but I have got to wonder if that translates to real world experience. The front diff of the Canter is from the old Pajero 4WD and I have often wondered if you could use one of the later ones with disk brakes ........ Just out of interest have you ever been able to lock the fronts in either the NPS or the Canter during your tests ???

Under all the various testing we've had to do to meet ADR regs with the bigger wheels and also for bus compliance....

But I suspect that's with a full load on, have you ever tested with a no load??


As for your brakes Jon......I have no answer. Like you said, there have been some very clever people looking at your truck and they all seem stumped. It is light...probably one of the lightest NPS motorhomes around but it still shouldn't be enough to give the problems you describe.....and I know we've spoken over the phone about this before.

Yeah and I still might pick your brains further, BTW do you do braided stainless hoses???

Possibly a manual bias valve is a good place to start......I don't fully understand the brake circuit through the NPS valve. It has an extra pipe that the Fuso FG doesn't have

yeah I noticed that, I read somewhere that it goes back to the front brake but that doesn't make sense because the fronts have higher pressure than the backs! I suspect it is either a balance circuit OR the front pressure acts a second moderator to the bias valve.

In the first case the second pipe is a simple bypass pressure relief mechanism which allows the bias valve to retain the same pressure after the brakes are applied. i.e. once the brakes are applied the bias pressure is constant regardless of the rear axle position changes. But if that is the case my theory about the problems I am getting cannot be correct.

In the second case the back pressure is modulated by BOTH the rear axle position AND the front brake pressure. This acts as sort of an emergency brake so that regardless of load when you stomp full on the pedal the back brakes get full pressure regardless of the bias valve rod position.

UPDATE: THE SECOND PIPE IS IN FACT AN EMERGENCY BACKUP, IF THE FRONT BRAKES FAIL I.E. NO FRONT BRAKE PRESSURE THEN THE LOAD SENSING VALVE DELIVERS FULL BRAKING PRESSURE TO THE REAR BRAKES UNMODULATED BY THE LOAD.

I will contact Willwood to see if I can get a manual replacement, an electric adjustable one would be cool :)

There are some really good aftermarket brake linings available for the FG's. Good improvement and at a fraction of the price of genuine.....I even know Fuso dealers that use them. I imagine you've already looked at your linings (front I'm talking about) and tried different ones?????

yep one that, the standard linings glaze at ~300C whereas the ABS ones wont glaze until well after 500C.

Do you go to Gold Coast Isuzu.....Doug down there is one of the best Isuzu guys I've met.....what's his opinion?

As I said above GC ISUZU have had it for three days checking and testing on a roller and basically have passed it back to me. I have the test results if you have any idea what they mean:

FL: 420% 7294 FR: 444% 6990 95.8%
RL: 514% 6874 RR: 561% 6102 88.7%


I'm sure everyone's told you to slow down but where's the fun in that.

Believe me I slow down in the wet!

As for the diff.......yes, they are a very tight for an LSD on the road (certainly tighter than an FG) but should be great in slippery or steep offroad situations because of this. Mind you I have never heard anyone complain about an FG rear either.

But I would prefer a locker if I could get one :-(

BTW, have a look at the list of options I have considered above, disk brakes, centre diff, ABS etc. Got any suggestions about who could do any of these as I have had zero luck finding anyone!
 
Last edited:

IcedVolvo

Observer
Just a small update to this thread.

1: There is a company in WA that does disk conversions for the NPS but its a complicated sealed wet system for use in mines etc. It is not yet approved for highway use (at least 6 months according to tech) and is NOT cheap. Interestingly the conversion is actually quite trivial: just a modified hub with a rotor and backing plate with a calliper, its the sealed liquid parts that are complicated!

2: The diffs in the NPS are listed as 5.125:1 but the nearest standard ratio commonly listed is 5.13:1 and so I just assumed that the ISUZU had some non standard ratios BUT IT HASN'T!! 5.125:1 is the common 41:8 tooth ratio used in many diffs which is rounded down to 5.13:1 (remember the old saying about ASSUME makes an *** out U and ME !!!! So as a result we are back in the hunt for one of two things:

- a locker diff centre for the rear diff or;

- an offset front diff for leaf springs with disk brakes (could be a Dana or Ford F series which bolts in here although steering linkages might be an issue)

3: There is a Toyota Coaster on the Sunshine Coast which used an NP 203 centre differential/transfer case (used in Ford/GM/Dodge 4WDs) with NPS front/rear diffs to give constant all wheel drive bus. So this combo is possible.

Any way the hunt to get better braking continues ........
 

whatcharterboat

Supporting Sponsor, Overland Certified OC0018
1: There is a company in WA that does disk conversions for the NPS but its a complicated sealed wet system for use in mines etc. It is not yet approved for highway use (at least 6 months according to tech) and is NOT cheap.

"NOT cheap" ...that's an understatement. Definitely not affordable for private application. About $5k each corner and another $5k for the controller AND they aren't ADR approved anyway. These are made for under ground vehicles more than anything else where they must have "fail to safe" and emergency braking systems with interlocks or extreme mine environments where I've heard of conventional brakes only lasting a couple of days (or less...seriously!!!) such as certain regions over in NZ where the mine roads could be all covered in a pumice slurry.

Anyway, from our testing under very controlled conditions the data shows the NPS will brake better than the FG .....
.

Doesn't surprise me cos the brakes are bigger; but I have got to wonder if that translates to real world experience.

Yes .....it does. The brake tests I'm describing prove that. A brake test machine won't give you enough information which is why the transport department require such stringent testing on an actual loaded or unloaded vehicle. Still, a brake test machine is an excellent way to tell quickly if there's a problem with a single brake shoe or drum, etc because it will give a different % one side from the other. Did you know that most mines in Qld require a current braketest report before any truck can be let on site?

The front diff of the Canter is from the old Pajero 4WD and I have often wondered if you could use one of the later ones with disk brakes

No......the FRONT diff centre on a Canter is similar but definitely not the same as the REAR diff centre of a V6 Pajero. The centre will not simply fit in as was once rumoured. So the axles and brakes are completely different too. I know cause we 've been looking at diff lock designs for the Canter front for years. BTW Should have the first one of these out by August and a production run 6 weeks after that.........if we can find the time.........have 8 new vehicles deadlined before the end of July. Talk about hectic and I bet young Andrew and his dad are just as busy over in the West too.

........ Just out of interest have you ever been able to lock the fronts in either the NPS or the Canter during your tests ???

No.........but that doesn't mean they aren't working hard. A cabover design throws alot of weight forward under brakes.


Under all the various testing we've had to do to meet ADR regs with the bigger wheels and also for bus compliance....
But I suspect that's with a full load on, have you ever tested with a no load??

Yeah Jon.......the full tests have to be done at a specified unladen weight which is worked out as the weight of a cabchassis and an empty work tray AND also at fully laden weight or in other words maximum GVM plus 5% to be sure. Then the data gets used to support 2 standards standards >>>one for a truck and a much tougher standard for a bus. The FG and NPS both pass the tougher standard for a bus even with the larger rolling diameter wheels.

,
BTW do you do braided stainless hoses???

Yes we do actually but only longer ones to suit FG's with long travel suspension. Unfortunately they have different fittings to the NPS too. Someone may be able to make these for you.

John.
 
Last edited:

IcedVolvo

Observer
Sine posting this thread I have been almost constantly investigating how to improve the braking on the NPS (and by default the Canter). We have basically given up on all options except changing to disk brakes for various technical and cost reasons.

Changing the NPS to disk brakes would appear to be a relatively simple task. In cars this is a routine conversion and there are "kits" for many popular older models. And for the NPS (and Canter), in theory at least, the change is actually quite simple.

However there is a catch: although supplying and affixing the callipers is a simple engineering exercise finding a rotor is NOT!

The first problem is that there NO rotors made which will directly bolt to the standard small truck 6 stud pattern; yes you read correct: every small truck which uses disc brakes bolts the rotors to the hub with a separate PCD mounting system. As a result we need to do this conversion with what us known as a "top hat" adapter to mount on the hub (instead of the drum) and the other end is fitted with a rotor. Again so far this is a simple engineering issue.

The problem is that the hub of the NPS is very BIG in diameter and very SMALL in depth => we need a FLAT two piece "top hat" style rotor.

Now finding flat rotors is not a problem ..... but finding ones with a big bore/ID hole AND strong enough for a truck is!

Flat rotors for trucks are all made for semi trailers and as such are very big (420+mm) whereas those "two piece" systems made for racing cars are too "flimsy" for truck use i.e. Willwood etc only have 6mm mounting flanges and 6mm bolts etc. As far as we have been able to find there are no others.

I have asked a Sydney based high performance brake specialist to search for me and the last hope is that some of the American specialists have robust two piece systems for the larger pick-up trucks such as the big Chevy/F550 etc which have similar GVMs to the NPS/Canter.

Another possibility is buses now have disk brakes and we may find a rotor there but again most of them use 22.5" rims and the rotors are simply too big.

Failing that we are just about at a dead end in the search for better brakes.

As a side note we can have custom rotors made (ironically one of the biggest disc brake rotor foundries in the world is right here in QLD!!) however although the rotors are relatively cheap there is a $25k setup/tooling cost which I do not have the funds to support so if there are any potential business entrepreneurs out there I am pretty sure every motor home manufacturer who uses a Canter/NPS base will want a "conversion kit"!
 

IcedVolvo

Observer
Hi Alan,

Now you have got me intrigued especially with the "very easily" bit! It's what I thought too but the engineers I have spoken to all shake their heads and twitch nervously.

Do you have access to casting facility i.e. a sandbox/furnace or would they be lathed up?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,608
Messages
2,907,841
Members
230,758
Latest member
Tdavis8695
Top