Freelander as an overland vehicle?

Alaska Mike

ExPo Moderator/Eye Candy
I agree completely in wanting a simple vehicle. That's why I got one with fuel injection. :D I hate carburetors and distributors. Different strokes for different folks. Having been trained as a powertrain engineer, I *get* these systems and they're very easy to understand and repair. Those who complain about them just haven't made the jump.

My early life where I was dealing with carburetors and such are full of plugged jets, mis-adjusted floats, and varnish. Difficult starting, lean when hot... worn points, cracked distributors, disintegrated coils. These things always leave you guessing as to the root cause, and they are NOT all as trail-fixable as people like to suggest. People like to point out about how a blown crank position sensor will leave you stranded. Ever have a stripped distributor gear? That'll leave you stranded too. People who prefer old things look at the CPS and say "see, there's something new that can go wrong that I don't have". Yeah, but you need to subtract the probably of stripping a distributor gear because we don't have one of those.
I think you have me wrong here (and TeriAnn as well). I'm installing a fuel injected engine on my Series III. Fuel injection's (as a general term) advantages far outweigh the negatives. The extra parts I can carry, and in my case aren't all that expensive to source. So you'll get zero argument from me (or TeriAnn) about the advantages of fuel injection. I would prefer a turbodiesel to the Rover V8, for simplicity and fuel economy (range). I'd prefer not having a computer controlled, automatic transmission, instead of a manual that had a low enough 1st gear for technical driving. I'd like as little wiring as possible for things like windows, mirrors, seats, and other things that I can manipulate manually without a great deal of effort. In other words, all of the things that Land Rover (and other marques) added to appeal to the upscale market. But that's me. I love the bones of the Discoveries, but I just don't like the details.
Look at the water line here. I have done exactly zero electrical preparation, and had zero problems with 3 days of water like this. I know others have been through deeper, particularly with diesels. I'm not claiming this is the ultimate. But some people think the electronics are not even capable of this. And remember, I've done *nothing* to it. 2 old Jeeps in my group had to limp home with wet distributors.
Unfortunately, the effects of this kind of use don't always show up immediately- on any vehicle, modern or antique. Did you drain all of the fluids (engine oil, diffs, transmission, transfercase...) after this trip? You might be surprised what got in there.

Modern automotive wiring is vastly superior to anything made as recently as the early '90s in terms of durability and being waterproof. Can't argue that one. However, adding miles of wiring to the basic harness exponentially increases your chances for system failure. It may be a minor problem that may not leave you stranded, but it's still a problem.

I've probably relayed this story before, but it illustrates my point. I used to own a Saturn Vue. Nice AWD car that did well in the snow (my ski car). Heated leather seats, power sunroof... pretty much loaded except for a disc changer. It had more options than I was looking for (I wanted a basic Subaru Forrester), but my then-wife thought it was what I needed and in the interest of harmony at home I bought it. I enjoyed some of the features it had. Some I rarely if ever used. I had no problems for the first two years I owned it, then one chilly winter day (-10F? Can't remember) I was driving home and the sunroof opened by itself. Wouldn't close. I got it home and sealed up the sunroof with an Action Packer lid, some plastic, and a bunch of packing tape. Ghetto-tastic. It spent over a week at the dealer, and I had to rent a car to get to work (I've since added that to the insurance policy). Condensation had destroyed the sunroof control module and started to go to work on the harness. All fixed, I kept driving the vehicle. That summer, it started throwing weird codes (intermittent, no pattern) and the ABS system started to chatter on dry pavement. Back to the dealer, who returned it no less than 3 times with a "no problem found" before they finally found the problem. The harness at the electric sideview mirrors had chafed and shorted. I've looked at the wiring harness schematics, and I can't see how that connected to the ABS or much of anything else, but that was the fix. No further problems, but my confidence was shot (as was my warranty). I traded it in on a much more basic vehicle. The Vue that year had a good reliability rating, and any model can have a few bad examples, but it further reinforced my belief that simple is better.

Unfortunately, Land Rover didn't give the NA market the choice when it came to the Discoveries. Most people would be astounded by the miles of wiring that is in a Disco. I used to work with aircraft avionics (specifically the F-15), and while wiring harnesses hold no real fear for me, I tend to view them as a necessary liability. You haven't had fun until you've wired a F-15 avionics bay. The fewer switches, sensors, connectors, and feet of wire you have in a hostile environment, the fewer things can go wrong.
 

Alaska Mike

ExPo Moderator/Eye Candy
You can, only it would be with a bit of work, like I'm doing to mine.
Electric sunroofs died, replaced with manual sunroofs. (or you could just have one with no sunroofs.
Window ECU's died, replacing with manual windows.
V8 getting tired. Replacing with a 300Tdi.
5-speed gearbox.
The only electrical thing I haven't seen a ready mechanical replacement for is the speedometer.
Once all that's done I won't need the gazillion relays, ECU's etc.
For me, if I look at it with the thought, "If it won't keep running and working after an EMP blast, it's too complicated." then I have it about right. ;)
I seriously considered stripping down a Disco just like you describe. I was going to do a 4.3L MPFI V-6 instead, but the thought process is still the same. After talking to a few people who had stripped down Discos for competitions (like the Outback Challenge), I decided that at the end of the day I probably wouldn't be attached enough to the vehicle to justify the effort and expense. I'm just not that much of a SUV guy. As much as they would be practical (for the family), they just don't get my heart racing like an old, slab sided utility vehicle.

However, if I could pick up a vehicle as basic as you describe for as cheap (and labor-free) as a Disco I, I'd be all over it. Somehow I don't think I'm going to find that rig.
 

R_Lefebvre

Expedition Leader
Yes, I did check the fluids. Some water got in the front diff so I changed that. I understand about the electrics. I'm currently working in a manufacturing plant, retrofitting modern touchscreen PLC's onto the old beasts. So far I find replacing everything with industrial ethernet is much more reliable than the electrics were. There's a LOT of wire in these old machines.
 

Antichrist

Expedition Leader
I decided that at the end of the day I probably wouldn't be attached enough to the vehicle to justify the effort and expense. I'm just not that much of a SUV guy. As much as they would be practical (for the family), they just don't get my heart racing like an old, slab sided utility vehicle.
I agree 100%. I'm not at all attached to my Discovery, but I bought it when the kids were little as my then wife didn't want them in the Series Rovers. It was the only way I could stay in Rovers if I wanted to take the kids off-roading.
Now I keep it because I couldn't get anything for it selling it. Plus it makes a better tow vehicle than the series Rovers.
 

FortyMileDesert

Adventurer
I wonder why I never noticed this post before?

I wonder why I never noticed this post before? Well, anyway, I just finished plodding my way all the way through it. So - from one who has been there:

I've owned and wheeled both the '02 Freelander S and the '04 Discovery S.

Both have been given the most rudimentary/minimal modifications that I felt necessary to trod about northern Nevadas terrain - Just a mild lift; some oversized A/T tires; skid plates and homebuilt sliders.

Both have spent more than 1/3 of the mileage lives off-road for a total of 158 treks (42 for the FL - the rest in the D2). Neither has ever left me stranded (and I've done more than half of my treks alone and beyond the reach of communication with other Homo Sapiens).

I've trekked with 110s, D90s, D1s, D2s, LR3s, RRs, RRSs, Chevies, Fords, Jeeps, Dodges, Kias, Suzukis, Toyotas, Mitsubishis, etc..... Have only had to tow home two rigs: a Toyota and a Dodge..........Anyway; they've all had their plusses and minuses.....

No, I really don't have any point to make - just thought I'd be represented. :coffeedrink:

Oh! You can find some of my treks (LR Trek XXX) on this site, some on Land Rover Addict and ALL OF THEM over at MuddyOval....
 

nickp

New member
New to the Freelander

I just got an '04 about a month ago and I am liking the car very much. It's mostly a city vehicle for me since I live and work in Brooklyn, NY. For that purpose, as well as for highway and dirt roads, it's a very nice ride. I got this to replace my '01 Pathfinder that I got when it was a 30 mile old baby but at 160K, it was time. The only thing I miss are the bigger feet for sand; Can anyone tell me what's the biggest tire they've fitted without a lift kit? I'm too cheap and lazy to do the lift kits and my sand use would be +- 2 weeks a year so I would rather spend my money on a warranty. I'm not expecting the same 160K reliability on this one.

Thanks!
 

Scott Brady

Founder
I cannot imagine the argument for buying a Freelander. If you want a road car/cute ute with bad weather capability, get a CRV, or if you want something nicer, a Lexus. Both will have 5x the service life of the Freelander and will get significantly better fuel economy, and be worth something when you trade it in.

If you want a Land Rover, buy one designed for serious duty, like the DI or Defender. A 2004 DII would be an acceptable option if you want something newer.

I am not trying to bash the Freelander, and have tested and driven them on the track and trail, but they struggle greatly in both situations. They are just not designed for serious use, are expensive new, suffer from epic reliability issues and do not even get good fuel economy. I see the car as an answer to a question no one asked. . .:ylsmoke:
 

Scott Brady

Founder
I disagree.

The typical Freelander buyer is new to Land Rovers (i.e. their first Land Rover) and also new to 4wds in general. The legacy of the Land Rover brand has sold many Freelanders, but their limitations in use become immediately apparent to the new owners, which becomes a source of disappointment. Eventually, they try to sell the car, but are usually upside-down on the payments, etc. Many LR dealers will not take them back on trade.

If an honest post and assessment of the vehicle from someone who has tested them in the field and is familiar with the risks of ownership saves even a few people from a potentially harmful (financially) purchase and disappointment (limitations as a trail/overland vehicle), than it is worth it. . .

I understand that you just purchased a new Freelander - that ship has sailed. So I hope it is everything you want it to be, and you have many great adventures with it. I look forward to seeing the pictures and hearing the stories.

Regards,
 

nickp

New member
I understand and would defer to your expertise as I am, as you say "new to Land Rovers" but many many factors came into play in my opting for this particular car, not the least of which was that I liked it; I liked it much more than a CRV, and i liked the size and comfort for my 95% urban/highway use. I read many threads in this and other forums about the shortcomings and accolades that these things get. Maybe I even read some posts by you and if so, thank you for the input. But being that this forum thread is named "kitting a Freelander" and yes, I already have mine, and most post here seem to be from Freelander owners, your original post did not seem too constructive. But maybe I'm overly sensitive since, so far, I like my new old car.
 

I Leak Oil

Expedition Leader
....but many many factors came into play in my opting for this particular car, not the least of which was that I liked it...

This is a very common theme among Land Rover owners. They have a particular attraction that other, more sterile but good, brands lack. Something you just can't quantify and many times clouds your more sensible side.
Drive what you love and you'll love to drive....:smiley_drive:
 
M

MuddyOval

Guest
I've really enjoyed both of the Freelanders I've had. No regrets, but Land Rover missed the boat when they stuck that horrible V6 in it.
My Freelander went many places people said it would never go and are secretly held in quite high regard by many of the Land Rover school instructors who understood how to drive them. They require a completely different technique to be effective off road. Rock on, enjoy what you drive. Life is too short to drive something you don't like.
 

I Leak Oil

Expedition Leader
Land Rover has missed the boat with their lack of engine choices here in the U.S. for a long time now.:(
 
Last edited:
M

MuddyOval

Guest
Land Rover has missed the boad with their lack of engine choices here in the U.S. for a long time now.:(

No kidding! When I put my name on the waiting list for a 93 D110, I was not even thinking they'd stick a V8 in it. Once I got it, the constant 'check engine' light was a constant reminder that I shouldn't have bothered. Found an interesting and legal way to TD5 my DII though. :wings: Not cheap, but they can be individually certified with a waiver.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
190,119
Messages
2,924,162
Members
233,417
Latest member
dhuss
Top