....
I don’t understand, even a little how that process works.
And I don’t want to see any family owned company go under. But if it was dismissed, (not allowed) does that not still mean that they owe a lot still?
Instead of allowing them to start with a “clean” slate?
Just speculation it it sounds like they owed there main supplier more than they could pay so they stopped delivering or the main supplier raised prices to a point that Hallmark felt they were held hostage so they bailed on paying. Just speculation..May or may not owe money but the settlements are probably better than employees and vendors would get if it went through bankruptcy
Just speculation it it sounds like they owed there main supplier more than they could pay so they stopped delivering or the main supplier raised prices to a point that Hallmark felt they were held hostage so they bailed on paying. Just speculation..
The best line from that TCM article:
According to Hallmark Manufacturing, filing Chapter 11 was a defensive legal action taken to protect their company from a frivolous lawsuit brought by C.F. Maier Composites, Hallmark’s original fiberglass roof and panel supplier.
Because that's what suppliers do right ?, initiate frivolous lawsuits. Isn't that what mfrs and suppliers do to stay in business for 30+ years ? (sarcasm)
Without any supporting detail or motive given that characterization is damning and unfair.
And makes me wonder if the writer has ever been a supplier or mfr. Or been in business for a few decades dealing with buying and selling, credit and getting paid.
It's not an easy thing, you know.
I also love how posters who have no clue about what was happening are quick to malign Hallmark.
The internet is such a strange place. It causes us to behave in ways that are oddly passive aggressive.
If you knew the Ward family, you’d know how off those random, unsupported musings are. You’d have to roam far and wide to find better, more honest people.
In the future, just hold your completely unsubstantiated thoughts to yourself rather than risk hurting someone who is upstanding and innocent.