Horizon Trailer COPYCAT

bmonday

Adventurer
bob said:
I am not trying to compete with Adventure Trailer. I am building trailers for friends.

bob said:
We feel it is a comparable option to a very good product. Competition makes improvements. Compare the two you will be pleasently surprised I think.

The guy can't even put together a single post without contradicting himself. Are you intending to compete with AT or not, Bob?

It's simply beyond the pale to expect us to beleive that you visited AT with the expectation of buying a trailer from them, given all the history you have (30+ years??) designing and building your own. Seriously? Do you really think we're all morons? Why would anyone buy a pre-made trailer if they already knew how to make one (making something yourself is always cheaper than having someone else make it for you). The Horizon's design elements are public knowledge, you didn't have to see one up close to know where the gaps were between your requirements and what AT is building.

I may have been born in the afternoon, but it wasn't yesterday afternoon.

BMonday
 

sundaypunch

Observer
Miss R2FJ said:
Well I've been following this thread for a while now, and it seems some people have come on here to burn Bob at the stake without even taking into consideration any other side of the story........ I really thought up until this point we had an intelligent community here who might think before speaking......

Any way you look at it this has turned into an unfortunate thread.
 

Ryanmb21

Expedition Leader
This is interesting thread, obviously a hot button topic as lots of people on here have vested interest.

First off, you can't deduce that Bob visited AT 100% to steel ideas. He could have been in the market, nobody knows his intention. The whole ..."he has 30 yr experience, why would he buy a trailer?" argument doesn't hold water. People pay for things they can do themselves all the time...how many of you have maids? Go to the dealer for oil changes? Hell, I'm a CPA and I don't even do my own taxes.

Fact is: we live in America, our economy is free...what's public is public. If an idea isn't patented or copyrighted, it's not protected.

Whether Bob intentions are make 10 or 10,000, he has the right and it doesn't matter. I don't really see the problem with the AT visit even if he was "sizing up the competition"...if I were going to manufacture something, the first place I would start would be my competition. If he thinks he can make the product better or cheaper, then he should, it's American.

I understand AT's frustration towards the situation, but I also don't think Bob's a lier.

Having seen several AT trailer's first hand, the quality is great, so challenging them will be a tough task. Time will tell what the market truly demands, often people's expressed values are very different than their actual expenditures.
 

Christian P.

Expedition Leader
Staff member
wow, you guys are a tough crowd. Everything gets copied all the time everywhere, I am not sure what's the big deal is about. It's been proven that's actually a good thing for the business.

In Quebec Safari Condo and New West are two companies who are doing poptop conversion for GMC Van and guess what, their offices/showroow are right next to each other. Not sure which one started first but both seems to be doing great now.
 
2aroundtheworld said:
I am not sure what's the big deal is about.


Situational ethics. Nothing wrong with HONEST competion and I don't think anybody would argue that but the actions of a certain party here are certainly up for debate as they should be.
 

Cabrito

I come in Peace
:lurk:

Wow this thread is sounding a lot like some other forums and not a lot like Expo.

Lots of mud slinging... :(
 

elcoyote

Supporting Sponsor, Overland Certified OC0004
gpwpat said:
· In the picture of Bob’s trailer we see five violations of the FVMSS rules, one CARB rule and one California DMV rule. While these things will not prevent a trailer from being registered, it would provide a lawyer with a good argument should an accident take place.

I am curious what these might be.

49 CFR, 575.6 (a)
49 CFR, 571.108, S5.7
49 CFR, subpart C, 393.43
CARB Div 12, CH 3, Art 1, sec 26303
CCR, Title 13, Div 3, CH 9, Art 6, sec 2467
 

wagner_joe

Adventurer
My thoughts are more along the lines below. It's not a knock at Bob, but it's the intentions of making trailers. The IRS (those guys we really love to H*T*) define a hobby in something you're not going to make a profit at.

I.e. I slapped some parts together and am only charging you cost (no labor, no markup), because if I sit in this recliner any longer, my wife will kill me for listening to the TV to loud, vs

a business which is to gain something (profit) out of the endeavor.. a few of the items that the IRS uses is a) have you done this before and made a profit? the others are listed below.

Again, I'm not here to Bash ANYONE, regardless of the circumstances. That's Why I'm here for Expo, but based on my intelligent mind (and the family of Accountants and Bookeepers I married into (three bookeepers, one forensic accountant, lots of messy divorces.. Think 7 grandparents.. who's house do you really want to go to???) then you have a lot of really boring conversations about Tax code and liabilities.. Think X-mas dinners... Hmmmmm.. Anyway.

His statements towards email me and I'll quote you and having a name for the trailer, would lead scepticism to anyone of any intelligence. In today's electronic age any intelligent attorney can sequester any backup file to find out the details, my life as a network administrator and programmer leave quite a trail for anyone to find. Expo Like any other forum is backed up. Either by the administrators or the hosting service. Not to mention plenty of Google sites.. So Bob's had his say, AT has had theirs, everyone else has gone to new lows and I say let GOD (yep religion.. delete post now) or the attorneys sort it all out. Let's keep it on the lighter side... :victory:

Hobby vs. business
The Internal Revenue Service defines a hobby as an activity you pursue without expecting to make a taxable profit. Basically you do it because you like it, regardless of the cost.

But if you demonstrate that you are involved in an activity with the expectation of making money on it, the IRS will consider it a business. As such, you'll be able to deduct expenses directly from your income. You even can deduct overall business losses in the years you don't turn a profit.

You must, however, make the right moves to convince the IRS that your sideline is a legitimate business.

What constitutes a business
The IRS uses two tests in determining whether your activity is a business rather than a hobby.

First, the profit test demands that you show you earned money on the activity in three out of five years.

If you can't meet the profits test, you get another chance to convince the IRS that you are running a business by passing the factors-and-circumstance test. Here, the tax agency takes a subjective, individualized look at your pursuit.


Basically, the IRS examines:


• Whether you carry on the activity in a businesslike manner. This includes, for example, keeping good books and records, promoting your business and holding down costs where possible.
• How much time and effort you devote to the enterprise.
• Whether you depend on income from the activity for your livelihood.
• If your losses are due to circumstances beyond your control or are normal for a business in its startup phase.
• Whether you change your methods of operation in an attempt to improve profitability.
• The knowledge and background you (or your advisers) have in running such a business.
• If you were successful in making a profit in similar activities in the past.
• Whether the activity makes a profit in some years and, if so, how much.
• Whether you can expect to make a future profit from the appreciation of the assets used in the activity.
• The element of personal pleasure involved in the activity. That doesn't mean you can't enjoy your new business, but you better be getting more out of it than just a good time.
 

Sojourn

Wanderer
I have been a longtime participant in the greatest, unregulated free market this world has ever known... the USA economy. I have also had the good fortune to have what is now the worlds largest car marker as a customer (well, I head up the company I work for efforts as an Account Manager) for more than 13 years...Toyota. I name drop for a reason, it is because most people weighing in here respect Toyota. As part of my activities in managing more than $60 million in annual sales to Toyota, as a supplier we support Toyota in what they (and other all other car makers) refer to as "tear down" actities, AKA benchmarking of other OEM's (competitor) vehicles. No one, on company, can develop a leading product in a vacuum. Knowing your competition is key to making a product that consumers want to spend their hard earned money on. As long as no intellectual property is stepped on, it is fair business. This is the free market.

That said, everyone thinks what the other guy is doing is easy, and that he can do it better/cheaper. It is easy to make statement without having to back it up. Copying a handful of trailers and selling them to "friends" is an inventive way of funding your research and development. My money and business is on the guy who sticks it out day after day, building a product that consumers are willing to pay premium and wait for. The prospect of saving 25% would not be worth being a

View attachment 21364
 

bob

Adventurer
scum of the earth here.

I started building the trailer to see if I could save myself a chunk of change. I actually told Mario I was building my own when I picked up the coupler and key locks. I was quoted by Mario that a fully loaded trailer would run me between 20 and 24 thousand dollars. I did not have that type of money to put into a trailer like this. I decided to build my own. I mentioned it to others on the FJ board and some wanted to keep track of what I was doing. Friends of mine saw the basic frame and encouraged me to follow through with it. The comments about getting a bigger area was honest. I did not have the room to do it hardly. Being able to build it on the floor and moving it to another site was a hopefull option. It did not materialize.

I have turned down building several trailers, and one large order as I do not have the time to do it. My goal was and always has been to build one trailer a month. But when I first started the project the interest was way more than I thought it would be. I entertained building more, but have pretty much decided not to pursue it. I am not a kid any longer and want spare time to spend with the grand children.

I was called by a representative that provides roof top tents. He stated he wanted to mass produce my trailer. I told him I would entertain the idea, but with talking with the wife, she feels it would be too much to take on.

I have 4 trailers on order currently, one being built as we speak, one to start on the 8th of August. I have to build in November, and one in December. I will not build any in September or October.

It is exciting to develop a product and have every single person that sees it be impressed with it. We did not take a single order for trailers at the Summit, as we were not a vendor. I did not want to violate any rules or regulations of the forum or the summit.

If copying the overall look of what I went to buy is wrong then I am guilty. I do feel the price I was quoted was way way way way over priced, but I never and will not state that the Adventure Trailer is not a high quality trailer. I was impressed with it.

The trailers are similar in dimensions. But far from exact.

Width, mine is two inches wider as mine are designed for FJ's
Side boxes are 15x15 by 48. Theirs are 14x14 by 54
The main boxes are completely different.
The frame is totally different I would assume. I never looked at theirs to have an idea, until after I had built mine.
The axles on mine are Dexter Torflex, which I used back in the late 70's with no failures. So I went with them.

According to my lawyer, patent infringement means being less than 10% different. The only thing on the trailers that is the same is the coupler. Which I bought from Mario. He does not manufacture it.

This has grown way out of proportion. And I am sorry for the heated discussion it has caused. I admire you all for supporting the vendor you bought your trailer from.

I did not start this project to become a competitor of Adventure Trailers. It may end up being that, but I doubt it.

Comments about comparing the two was in response to it being a cheap copy cat trailer, cutting corners to make it cheaper. The cost on my personal trailer was quite a bit less than theirs, as I did all the work. My trailers are not that much less than Adventure Trailers.

I used the frame that I built all of my trailers from. That was nearly 30 years ago and many of them are still on the road. The frame of the trailer is the backbone and the most important part of it. I did not feel and still do not feel that they have a better frame, or a worse frame. It is their design and I am sure it is more than adequate, as is mine.

As far as safety problems, I will investigate those. I would assume it is the placing of the tail lights, which have been moved to the outside. The carb problems are minor as the trailer is sold with out gas cans. Every single motorcycle trailer, jet ski trailer use the fluid containers. I would not worry too much about that

But now I must find another tent provider. As camping lab, which imports tents from China will no longer provide them to me as Adventure Trailers will be buying and using the copied tents from China. Amazing isn't it.
 

Martyn

Supporting Sponsor, Overland Certified OC0018
I’ve been following this thread closely and it’s been interesting to follow everyone’s comments.

I have a few questions of my own.

1) What is a copy? I’m interested in how you define the term, or how you recognize a copy objectively.

2) Are the design parameters of a trailer so confined that only a limited number of designs can be manufactured?

I’ve been told a "copy" is "a double, imitation or reproduction of an original."

In 2003 after we had stopped importing trailers from South Africa we went out of our way to design the Horizon so that it had as few similarities as possible with the imported model. I have attached a picture of both the South African trailer and the Horizon so you can compare the two. Are they copies?

The similarities between a military trailer and the Chaser are obvious. Compare the picture of a military trailer and a Chaser. The construction is different, the chassis is different, the suspension is different but are they copies?

Does it matter that the military trailer design has been in public domain since the 40’s? Did it matter that we choose to release the Chaser only after the company making a similar design went out of business? Or is a copy just a copy?

I have also placed a picture of the Horizon and the trailer in question, are they copies?

Moving on to trailer design. I believe someone said if you put three boxes together you come up with a Horizon. Is that a fair statement?

I pulled together some pictures I had of trailers from around the world in an attempt to see if this assumption was correct. Have a look at the collage and let me know.

Lastly a plea. Please try to remain objective in this thread. Don’t accuse Bob of something you think he may have done, read Bob’s posts both in this thread and on the Fjcruiserforums.com before passing comment. Don’t rely on what others say read it for yourself. Give Bob the benefit of the doubt if you are uncertain.

If Bob is above board and wishes to compete on a level playing field, I say his entering the field is good for everyone. If that is not the case then time will tell.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,050
Messages
2,912,408
Members
231,545
Latest member
JPT4648
Top