teotwaki
Excelsior!
pskhaat said:<sarcasm>
There's a difference between the FJ and the 4Runner?
</sarcasm>
The FJC is funny looking...... sort of a 4x4 Scion Xb :sport_box
pskhaat said:<sarcasm>
There's a difference between the FJ and the 4Runner?
</sarcasm>
expeditionswest said:I have driven the 4runner with the 8 and the FJ with the six, and think the six is a better choice. Hauling the heavy trailer would make the 8 nice though.
Neither the FJ, KJ or Gen 4 4Runners have snorkel options currently.
expeditionswest said:If you want something wild, build a Brute!
Willman said:I'm missing something here......
EDIT: Gotta remember here...I rode the small bus to school when i was a kid:hehe:
SeaRubi said:i vote for the Liberty. :REOutArchery02:
let's look at what you want to use the rig for ... if it's "overland" type travel, there's alot of benefits to the Liberty.
Let's face it - you're not rock crawling, so the big lift and big tires has limited value for your application.
expeditionswest said:The Xterra would be an option too (and a good one). In the world of reasonably priced, functional expedition wagons, those are the only ones I would consider...
Bongo Boy said:I have a 2005 Rubicon and the FJ Cruiser SE TRD, manual 6-speed--the worst mileage of the FJ lot by far. I don't think the FJ and the Liberty are comparable, but in any case I sure can't recommend the FJ for any purpose at all.
While, IMO, the FJ looks like a soccer-mom car, it would be fairly impractical for that purpose since no one can get out of the back of the car, curbside, without someone opening the front passenger door. The door configuration alone makes it a certain-injury for young kids, IMO, and I think a two-door would be no more inconvenient and quite a bit safer. In order to outfit it with aftermarket product to make it look something like a vehicle that might get out of the neighborhood, I think you're looking at an outrageous amt of cash, too--based on a few things I've looked at. I don't think there's an aftermarket bumper for it that's much under $1,000 USD, for example.
As an offroad vehicle--well, it simply won't fit between the trees on some of the easy forest service trails I frequent, and you can't see out of it anyway. It's NOT a rig I'd enjoy driving on anything but a wide-open trail. If you're accustomed to full-size, fat off-road vehicles, it won't be a problem, though.
I don't know what the range is, but it has poor mileage combined with a small fuel tank--bad conbination.
It's a quiet, smooth and comfortable ride on the highway and it tows 5,000 lbs (rated). That's the only reason I bought it, and if I got a divorce today, the FJ would happily go with her. She prefers it because it's quiet, and the top is always up so her hair doesn't get dorked.
I don't like it much, and wouldn't recommend it to anyone. I don't enjoy driving it (except on the freeway) and don't enjoy being seen in it, either. I'm really struggling to figure out what it's intended purpose is, actually. I've been spoiled by the TJ, I guess, and am really used to the high visibility and maneuverability. I have to think if you spend a good bit of time road-testing them both, you'd have to go with the Liberty, unless you just prefer the FJ styling.