New Defender Rage/Hate Thread

Todd780

OverCamper
There is little reason for the professional class to own a pickup, especially an old design.

Not trying to introduce politics/class in the discussion. Just simple business choices.

Now if JLR actually wanted to "return to it's roots" we would have a different vehicle to critique.
Well, I think there is a basis for professionals to own a pick up. Lots of manufactures offer 80K half ton trucks now.

But, that is a different topic.
 

Todd780

OverCamper
Was it though? I can't remember that being an option in the last years? I wonder how many of those they sold compared to the already few sold of the Defenders.
No clue. I thought recently. Like 2016? Didn't they just use one in a pretty new bond movie?
 

Pilat

Tossing ewoks on Titan
No clue. I thought recently. Like 2016? Didn't they just use one in a pretty new bond movie?

Don't know about the movie, but I think at least one of those you linked to is a custom jobbie (the crew cab). But since it was built as it was built (frame etc.), it wouldn't be difficult to make it into a pickup. And maybe some of those government (etc.) LRs that stood for 3/4s of the sales in the last years were pickups? Not to sure about it, to be honest. I just don't think they sold pickups (at least to consumers) in the last few years of the old Defender.
 

EricTyrrell

Expo God
What "people" are you talking about? The old defender didn't sell.
The people who believe the luxury Defender is a joke. As for sales, it sold fine until it was neglected, which was not its fault.


A solid axle (also on the front) was your old wishlist. Is that now void?
The vehicles being used as examples of vehicle evolution, are solid axle vehicles, so I'm not sure where your confusion arises.


No, with these latest diversions, it is now a pickup truck.
No... read again. See below
imagine a JL Wrangler/Gladiator with higher towing/payload, stronger components, larger cargo capacity, and Defender design (of course).
Just as the Defender was offered in multiple configurations, more than the Wrangler and Gladiator actually, the example includes this possibility, not just pickups.


LOL, you think the one star of the Wrangler is a far improvement in safety?
Over the original Defender, yes. Just as the JL is vastly more safe than the Jeeps it evolved from in the same time period.


And now that you mention the Jimny and Wrangler again, we're back to those kind of cars. And, suprisingly, neither the Jimny, nor the Wrangler can carry or tow much.
If you want an uprated Wrangler - that can actually tow and carry something, perhaps you should ask Fiat/Chrysler to make such a thing. They already have a vehicle with a solid front axle.
..or Land Rover could have produced a genuine Defender, which would be similar to the Jeeps (it always was), but with..
higher towing/payload, stronger components, larger cargo capacity, and Defender design (of course).


LR's unreliable? You are talking about a completely revised and ruggedised version of this. Something you don't actually know if it is unreliable.
Yes, they're still unreliable. One must be living under a rock to be unaware of their continued difficulties. The only consistently reliable components of Land Rovers are made of metal.
 

nickw

Adventurer
The space between Series/Defender and Wrangler JL or luxury Defender is massive. A genuine modern Defender would slot somewhere between. The Land Cruiser and Jeep, both extremely similar, evolved into what we have today (70 Series, JL), but was differentiated by capability and capacity. Imagine if the Defender had evolved along the same lines.
It did, just like the original Jeep evolved into what it is today, the Wrangler and the old land cruisers evolved into what we see today, the 200 series. Neither of which are simple, both are more refined versions of what they once were. The Wrangler had SAs, Cruisers IS/SA snd Defender IS....but they are very sim to one another when it comes down to it.

70 series is unique, I think the new Defender is more similiar to a 70 series than a Jeep is, personally. Besides SAs, not much comparable.
 
Last edited:

A.J.M

Explorer
The old defender was offered as hard top and pick up right to the end.
Very last one was a 90 soft top.

During the full model life, from 83 to 16, very little body wise changed.
Seat boxes need a little tweak depending on model and fuel tank location but wings, bonnet, screen, doors, roof etc are pretty much interchangeable from early to late models.

In many ways the defender was a great car, easily customisable, could do many things, reasonably good off road, but in many ways, they are awful.

They are rubbish for any distance driving, crampt cabins, the stock seats are torture, the noise and vibrations are bad, which is a by product of how it’s made.

The moans of a “luxury defender” seem to ignore the fact that there are many companies that will happily retrim or sell leather seats, dashes, door cards, fit expensive head linings, big 18” wheels and tyres and all sorts of suspension and brake upgrades. Twisted, Khan, Mor, kingsman and more. If you think a new HSE spec is expensive, see what some of these companies charge...

Having driven and been driven in plenty of the old ones and likely one of the few posting in this thread to actually have seen, sat in and tried out some of the functions of the new one.
The new car is a defender. It’s not a D5, and it’s not a D3 like what I own.
It’s it’s own car, with plenty of nods to the past model, but correcting many of the stupid flaws of the old one.
 

Red90

Adventurer
I find the Defender very comfortable for long distance driving. Very relaxing and comfortable seating position. Much nicer than most modern cars.
 

JackW

Explorer
I did a 600 mile day in my D90 a couple of weeks ago, it took over thirteen hours of driving, but I could still walk after we got home.
 

Christian P.

Expedition Leader
Staff member
I find the Defender very comfortable for long distance driving. Very relaxing and comfortable seating position. Much nicer than most modern cars.

I also find my Volkswagen Vanagon Syncro 1989 with 330000 miles very reliable for long distance driving. Very relaxing and comfortable seating position.

Much nicer than most modern cars, including the 2020 Ram Rebel with heated seats I have in my driveway right now.

;)

Happy Thanksgiving everyone - be thankful that this thread lasted that long!

:)

IMG_1044.jpg


IMG_1033.jpg


IMG_1032.jpg

IMG_1042.jpg
 

nickw

Adventurer
I also find my Volkswagen Vanagon Syncro 1989 with 330000 miles very reliable for long distance driving. Very relaxing and comfortable seating position.

Much nicer than most modern cars, including the 2020 Ram Rebel with heated seats I have in my driveway right now.

;)

Happy Thanksgiving everyone - be thankful that this thread lasted that long!

:)

View attachment 553536


View attachment 553534


View attachment 553535

View attachment 553537
Like the Rebel? Air sus?
 

EricTyrrell

Expo God
It did, just like the original Jeep evolved into what it is today, the Wrangler and the old land cruisers evolved into what we see today, the 200 series. Neither of which are simple, both are more refined versions of what they once were. The Wrangler had SAs, Cruisers IS/SA snd Defender IS....but they are very sim to one another when it comes down to it.

70 series is unique, I think the new Defender is more similiar to a 70 series than a Jeep is, personally. Besides SAs, not much comparable.

Land Cruiser evolved into three lines: heavy duty, light duty, and station wagon. The 200 series is in the station wagon line. The Early Land Cruisers evolved most directly into the HD line where the 70 series currently resides. If the Defender had continued to evolve as the others did, it would today resemble a vehicle similar to the Pajero, JL, Patrol, 70 Series, and Jimmy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,526
Messages
2,906,251
Members
230,547
Latest member
FiscAnd
Top